Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005334C070206
Original file (20050005334C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           8 November 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050005334


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Lisa O. Guion                 |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Stanley Kelley                |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Diane J. Armstrong            |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Delia R. Trimble              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart (PH) with
2nd Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he never received the third award
of the PH to which he was entitled.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the Company B, 30th Infantry
Regiment's Morning Report (WD AGO Form 1), dated 28 April 1944, and his
separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of alleged error that occurred
on 3 August 1946.  The application submitted in this case is dated 30 March
2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s military record shows he was inducted into the Army of
the United States and entered active duty on 5 April 1943.  He was trained
in, awarded, and served in military occupational specialty (MOS) 502
(Administrative NCO).

4.  The applicant’s separation document shows that he served in the
European Theater of Operations (ETO) from 28 September 1943 through 21
August 1944, and that he was credited with participating in the Naples-
Foggia, Rome-Arno and Anzio campaigns of World War II.  It also shows that
during his active duty tenure he earned the PH with 1st OLC, Meritorious
Service Unit Insignia with Star, Bronze Arrowhead, World War II Victory
Medal, European African Middle Eastern Campaign Medal with 3 Bronze Service
Stars, Good Conduct Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and the American
Theater Ribbon during his active duty tenure.  Item 34 (Wounds Received in
Action) confirms that the applicant was wounded in action in the ETO on 19
April 1944 and 25 May 1944.

5.  The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains a
company morning report that shows the applicant was lightly wounded in
action on 26 April 1944; however, the wound did not require the applicant
to be hospitalized.  The MPRJ is void of any orders indicating he was ever
awarded the PH with 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster based on this third wounding in
action.

6.  On 3 August 1946, the applicant was honorably separated after
completing a total of 3 years, 3 months, and 29 days of active military
service.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and
criteria concerning individual military awards.  Paragraph 2-8 contains the
regulatory guidance pertaining to awarding the PH.  It states, in pertinent
part, that in order to award a PH there must be evidence that a member was
wounded or injured as a result of enemy action.  The wound or injury for
which the PH is being awarded must have required treatment by a medical
officer, and this treatment must have been made a matter of official
record.  Award of a second or subsequent awards of the PH are recognized by
an Oak Leaf Cluster.

8.  Paragraph 3-13 of the awards regulation states, in pertinent part, that
the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) is awarded for heroism and for meritorious
achievement or service in military operations against an armed enemy.  The
BSM is authorized for each individual who was cited in orders or awarded a
certificate for exemplary conduct in ground combat between 7 December 1941
and 2 September 1945 or whose achievement or service, during that period,
was confirmed by documents executed prior to 1 July 1947.  An award of the
CIB is considered to be a citation in orders for this purpose.  This means,
in effect, that the BSM is to be awarded to individuals who earned the CIB
for service during World War II.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he is entitled to a third award of the
PH has been carefully considered and found to have merit.  The evidence of
record confirms the applicant was awarded the PH with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster
for being wounded in action in the ETO on 19 April and 25 May 1944.  A unit
Morning Report, dated 28 April 1944, confirms the applicant was also
wounded in action on 26 April 1944, which corroborates his claim of
entitlement to the third award of the PH.  As a result, his records should
be corrected to show he is entitled to the PH with 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster,
for being wounded in action on 19 April, 26 April, and 25 May 1944.

2.  By regulation, members who earned the CIB during World War II are
entitled to the BSM.  In view of the fact the applicant earned the CIB
during World War II, he is also entitled to the BSM.  Therefore it would be
appropriate to add this award to his record at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

___SK __  ___DJA__  __DRT__  GRANT RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart with 2nd
Oak Leaf Cluster, for being wounded in action in the ETO on 19 April 1944,
26 April 1944, and 25 May 1944 and awarding him the Bronze Star Medal based
on his award of the CIB; by amending Item 34 (Wounds Received In Action) of
his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show he was wounded in action in the ETO on 19
April 1944, 26 April 1944 and 25 May 1944 and Item 33 by deleting the
current Purple Heart entry and replacing it with the entry “Purple Heart
2nd Oak Leaf Cluster” and adding the Bronze Star Medal; and by providing
him a correction to his separation document that includes these changes.




            ____Stanley Kelley______
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050005334                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |NA                                      |
|DATE BOARDED            |2005/11/08                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |3 AUGUST 1946                           |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 615-361                              |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0015                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012076

    Original file (20080012076.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests in effect, that the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) for valor, the Silver Star (SS), Purple Heart (PH) with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award), and Glider Infantry Badge; to show his eligibility for the French Fourragere, Belgian Fourragere, Netherlands Order of William, Belgium Order of the Day, and Netherlands Orange Lanyard; and that he be issued award certificates for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010924

    Original file (20090010924.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that she hopes there is a record of the FSM being awarded the SS because he did earn it and receive it. Given hospital commanders had the authority to award the PH for wounds received in action, this also could possibly be the award the applicant believes the FSM was awarded and for which he received a certificate while in the hospital. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010202

    Original file (20080010202.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he should be awarded the PH for being wounded in action on 19 February 1945. This case is being considered using a reconstructed file from NPRC and documents provided by the applicant, which include the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55, Army Separation Qualification Record (WD AGO Form 100), Certificate of Disability for Discharge (WD AGO Form 40), and Medical Record Documents. The evidence confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM during his active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013059

    Original file (20090013059.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chapter 5 of the awards regulation contains guidance on service medals and service ribbons. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 32 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 to reflect all eight campaigns identified and to correct item 33 by adding the DUC 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award), Army Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp, and 1 silver service star, 3 bronze service stars and 1 bronze arrowhead with his EAME Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002526

    Original file (20090002526.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence includes orders awarding the FSM the BSM 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) for heroism on 13 and 14 December 1944 in Germany, and a letter from the Commanding General, Army Service Forces, which confirmed the FSM's eligibility for the CMB and directed he be issued this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 33 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 by deleting the current list of awards and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014720C071029

    Original file (20060014720C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 April 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060014720 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Item 41 (Awards, Decorations, and Citations) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 66 shows that he earned the SS, which was authorized in GO # 40 issued in 1945; the PH, which was authorized in GO # 11 in February 1945; and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006195C070206

    Original file (20050006195C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he is entitled to the PH based on shrapnel wounds he received in his right leg on 7 October 1944, and this award should be added to the awards listed on his separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55). It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member participated in while serving in the ETO. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060477C070421

    Original file (2001060477C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. Also on file is a military record finding report from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), dated 1 August 2001. The Board also finds the available evidence confirms that the applicant served with the 507 th Parachute Infantry Regiment in the ETO and that the unit listed in his separation document was likely a transitional unit to which he was assigned for movement and processing prior to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005936C071029

    Original file (20070005936C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart (PH) and correction of his record to include all awards to which he is entitled based on his World War II service. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Bronze Star Medal 1st Oak Leaf Cluster for his exemplary conduct in ground combat against an armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089153C070403

    Original file (2003089153C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Further, there are no other orders or other documents on file that show the applicant was wounded in action on any other date, to include 3 January 1945, or that he was ever awarded a second PH. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was awarded the PH, for wounds he received as a result of enemy action on 4 January 1945, in Belgium. Although the PH entry in Item 33 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 indicates it was awarded with cluster, GO #35, the source authority for this entry, only...