Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005022C070206
Original file (20050005022C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        11 August 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050005022


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Stacy R. Abrams               |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John Slone                    |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Deborah Jacobs                |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Michael J. Flynn              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the Purple Heart be added to his DD Form
214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was lightly wounded on his
right knee while his unit was engaged in a heavy firefight in Vietnam.  He
further states that he was treated by a medic and kept in the field.

3.  The applicant also states that he received his Purple Heart about a
month later, but failed to ensure it was annotated on his DD Form 214.

4.  The applicant provides a copy of a DD Form 1156 (Casualty Feeder
Report).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 30 March 1969, the date of his separation from the Army.  The
application submitted in this case is dated 18 March 2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error. This provision of law allows the Army Board for
Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the
3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it would be in
the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a
review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the
interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's service personnel records show he was inducted in the
Army on 24 July 1967.  He successfully completed basic training and
advanced individual training and was initially awarded the military
occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the National
Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal and
the Good Conduct Medal.

5.  The applicant's DA Form 20 shows in item 31 (Foreign Service) that he
served in the Republic of Vietnam from 1 April 1968 through 31 March 1969.

6.  The applicant's DA Form 20 does not show any entry in item 40 (Wounds)
or list the Purple Heart in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).
7.  There are no General Orders in the available records which show that
the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart.  There also is no evidence in
the available records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a
result of hostile action.

8.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

9.  A DD Form 1156 (Casualty Feeder Report) provided by the applicant shows
he was lightly wounded in battle on 13 May 1968.

10.  Review of the applicant's records reveals that he may be entitled to
additional awards which are not shown on his DD Form 214.

11.  Records show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman's Badge
by Department of Army Headquarters, 199th Infantry Brigade, Special Orders
116, dated 25 April 1968.

12.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign
Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units
serving in Vietnam.  This document shows that, at the time of the
applicant's assignment to A Company, 5th Battalion, 12th Infantry Division,
the unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor
Medal First Class Unit Citation by Headquarters Department of the Army
General Orders Number 51, dated 1971.

13.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 list the unit awards received by
units serving in Vietnam.  This document shows that, at the time of the
applicant's assignment to A Company, 5th Battalion, 12th Infantry Division,
the unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross
with Palm Unit Citation by Headquarters Department of the Army General
Orders Number 51, dated 1971.

14. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part,
that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that
the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required
treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of
official record.  There is no statute of limitations governing requests for
award of the Purple Heart.




15.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows that the applicant
participated in five campaigns during his service in Vietnam; however, his
records do not show award of bronze service stars to recognize campaign
participation.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows that the
applicant participated in the TET Counteroffensive, the Vietnam
Counteroffensive Phase IV, the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V, Vietnam
Counteroffensive Phase VI and the TET Counteroffensive 1969.

16.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, that a silver service star is
authorized in lieu of five bronze service stars

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that the Purple Heart be added to his DD Form
214 and it be mailed to him.

2.  The evidence of record provides no confirmation that the applicant was
ever wounded in action.  Further, item 40 of his DA Form 20 is blank and
his name is not included on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, which would
indicate he was never wounded or injured in action.

3.  A casualty feeder report submitted by the applicant shows he was
lightly wounded in action.  Absent any other corroborating evidence that
shows the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds due to hostile
action, there is insufficient basis for award of the Purple Heart in this
case.

4.  Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Combat
Infantryman Badge.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his
record to show this badge.

5.  General Orders awarded the applicant the Republic of Vietnam Civil
Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam
Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, it would be
appropriate to correct his records to show this foreign unit awards.

6.  The evidence of record further shows that based on his Vietnam campaign
participation, the applicant is entitled to five bronze service stars with
his Vietnam Service Medal.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct
his records to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal with one silver
service star.

7.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 30 March 1969, the date of his
discharge; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for
correction of any error or injustice expired on 29 March 1972.  Although
the applicant did not file within the ABCMR's statute of limitations, it is
appropriate to waive failure to timely file based on the evidence in this
case.

8.  Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative
error which does not require action by the Board.  Therefore,
administrative correction of the applicant’s records will be accomplished
by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as
outlined by the Board in paragraph 2 of the BOARD
DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__MJF____  _DJ____  _JS____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that it was appropriate to waive the ABCMR's three
year statute of limitations in the case.

2.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned to show award of
the Purple Heart.

3.  The Board determined that administrative error in the records of the
individual should be corrected.  Therefore, the Board requests that the
CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual
concerned to show the Combat Infantryman's Badge, the Republic of Vietnam
Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, the Republic of
Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Vietnam Service
Medal with one silver service star.


                                      __John N. Slone__
                                            CHAIRPERSON
            INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050005022                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050811                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073181C070403

    Original file (2002073181C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    United States Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, General Orders Number 3889, dated 18 July 1970, show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 11 February 1970. However, evidence of record shows the applicant received two awards of the Silver Star. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in seven campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of one silver service star and two bronze service stars...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026731

    Original file (20100026731.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available evidence confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM with "V" Device by the appropriate award authority and this award was announced in official orders. As a result, the regulatory criteria necessary for the award of the PH has been satisfied in this case and the applicant's record should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004942C070206

    Original file (20050004942C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member who has been wounded or killed in action. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant held a qualifying infantry MOS, served in a qualifying infantry unit in the RVN, and participated in combat with his unit, as evidence by his being wounded in action on 26 April 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004157

    Original file (20120004157.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Purple Heart for wounds received on 25 March 1971 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. d. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), based on the available evidence it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 19 March 1970 through 14 March 1972 and to correct his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007679

    Original file (20080007679.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 9 February 2005; his sworn statement, dated 16 February 2005; a DA Form 1156 (Casualty Feeder Report), dated 8 June 2003; orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge and Army Commendation Medal; a narrative for the Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device; discharge orders, dated 9 May 2005; a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); a deployment memorandum; a DA Form 200 (Transmittal Record), dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010091

    Original file (20060010091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) that he be awarded the Purple Heart. The Board concluded that the evidence of record provided no confirmation that the applicant was ever wounded in action. Absent any other corroborating evidence that showed the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds due to hostile action, there was insufficient basis for award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007957

    Original file (20110007957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004465

    Original file (20080004465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by military medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart for a wound sustained as the result of a hostile act on 20 February 2006 while he was serving in Iraq. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015656

    Original file (20090015656.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show that the applicant participated in five campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Purple Heart and Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart with first oak leaf cluster for wounds received in action on 21 November 1968; and c. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Purple Heart with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007105

    Original file (20080007105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in Iraq. The evidence provided by the applicant shows that he sustained an injury while on a military operation. Furthermore, the applicant states that his recommendation for award of the Purple Heart for this injury was denied.