Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004716C070206
Original file (20050004716C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        12 JANUARY 2006
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050004716


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Gale J. Thomas                |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Linda Simmons                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Rodney Barber                 |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Rea Nuppenau                  |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected by changing his
DD Form 214 Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), item
26 (Separation Code) and item 27 (Reentry Code).

2.  The applicant states that his separation code and reentry code were
incorrectly entered on his DD Form 214.  He states that his DA Form 1811
(Physical Data and Aptitude Test Scores Upon Release from Active Duty) will
show that his physical profile at the time of his discharge was 111111 A.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his 1986 DD Form 214 from the Air
Force, his 1992 DD Form 214 from the Army, and his 1992 DA Form 1811.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on
5 October 1992.  The application submitted in this case is dated 11 March
2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s records indicate he served in the United States Air
Force from January 1982 until April 1986.  On 6 October 1987 he enlisted in
the Regular Army for a period of 6 years.  He served in Germany from
October 1987 to October 1990.

4.  On 4 August 1992, a medical examination cleared the applicant for
separation.

5.  On 5 October 1992, a DA Form 1811, determined that the applicant was
physically qualified for separation/retention, with a physical profile of
111111.



6.  On 5 October 1992, the applicant was honorably discharged under the
provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 4, for expiration term of
service. His DD Form 214 indicates he was discharged in the rank of
Specialist, pay grade E-4, and had a total of 9 years and 3 months of
active service.  He was assigned the Separation Code of “JBK”, and the
Reentry Code of “4.”

7.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 states that SPD codes are three-character
alphabetic combinations, which identify reasons for, and types of
separation from active duty. The primary purpose of SPD codes is to provide
statistical accounting of reasons for separation.  They are intended
exclusively for the internal use of DOD and the military services to assist
in the collection and analysis of separation data.  It notes that “JBK” is
the appropriate SPD code for individuals involuntarily separated upon
completion of required active service.

8.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release
from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their
service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210
covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and
processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the United States Army Reserve.
Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribed basic eligibility for prior service
applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE
codes, including RA RE codes.

9.  RE-4 applies to individuals who were separated from their last period
of service with a non-waivable disqualification.  Soldiers who were
separated from their term of service with a Department of the Army imposed
bar to reenlistment in effect are ineligible for reenlistment and receive
an RE-4.

10.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that individuals must be able to
meet the Regular Army retention control point for his/her grade prior to
reenlisting.  Those individuals who are reenlisting in the grade of
specialist, the term of enlistment when added to the individuals previous
active Federal service must not exceed 10 years of active Federal service.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his separation code and reentry code is
in error because he was in good physical condition, is without merit.  His
medical condition had no bearing on his separation code or his reentry
code.

2.  The applicant was barred from reenlisting as a result of him not being
able to meet the retention control point for his grade.  The applicant
would have been reenlisting in the grade of Specialist with 9 years and 3
months of active Federal service, and when added to his enlistment
obligation would have exceeded the 10 year retention control point.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in
error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would
satisfy that requirement.

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 5 October 1992; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on
4 October 1995.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of
limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to
show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to
timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__LS____  __RB ___  __RN ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.



                                  _____Linda Simmons______
                                            CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050004716                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20060112                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |110.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011586C070208

    Original file (20040011586C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. By regulation, members separated upon the completion of their enlistment who are ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment will be assigned a SPD code of JBK, and a corresponding RE code of RE-3. The evidence of record in this case confirms the applicant was ineligible for reenlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069426C070402

    Original file (2002069426C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that based on his assigned SPD code he was only granted one-half separation pay based on 16 years of active duty service. However, the evidence of record clearly establishes, as evidenced by his separation order and other separation documents, that he was separated by reason of ETS, under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200, which should have been the separation authority entered in his separation document. Lacking independent evidence that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005360

    Original file (20090005360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the reentry eligibility (RE) code he was assigned upon his discharge from the Army on 17 February 1992 be changed from RE-3 to RE-2. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-3 on 22 August 1979 with prior service in the U.S. Army Reserve. The evidence of record shows that the applicant's company commander recommended he be barred from reenlistment based on his substandard performance.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015598

    Original file (20080015598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not provide any evidence which shows that any of the conditions for which the VA awarded him disability compensation affected his ability to perform his military duties. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of 3 is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals involuntarily discharged at the completion of required active service. While it is clear that the applicant was retained beyond his ETS in order to receive medical care, there is no evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062072C070421

    Original file (2001062072C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. It notes that “JBK” is the appropriate SPD code for individuals separated upon completion of an enlistment contract but who are “ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment….” That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by correcting the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062114C070421

    Original file (2001062114C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, dated March 2001, provides instructions for determining the RE code for Active Army soldiers and Reserve Component soldiers separated for cause. It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply. The Board notes that the applicant was voluntarily separated from service at his normal ETS under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 4 and was issued an SPD code of “JBK” with a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004572

    Original file (20110004572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DD Form 214 shows in: * item 6 (Reserve Obligation Termination Date) she had no Reserve obligation when she was discharged * item 25 (Separation Authority) - Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel) , chapter 4 * item 26 (Separation Code) - "JBK" * item 27 (RE Code) - "4" 7. The version in effect at the time of her discharge stated Soldiers with less than 10 years of active Federal service would be reenlisted for 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 years of service. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073692C070403

    Original file (2002073692C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Army Reserve for six years on 5 February 1982 and completed his initial active duty for training. The applicant was discharged on his separation date on 7 October 1991. A separation code of “JBK” identifies an enlisted soldier discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 4, for completion of required active service, who is ineligible for, barred from, or otherwise denied reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059231C070421

    Original file (2001059231C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010937

    Original file (20100010937.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 March 2003 for a period of 3 years. On 14 February 2010, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 4, by reason of completion of required active service. There is no evidence the applicant applied for enlistment in a Reserve component prior to his discharge.