RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 8 December 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050004522
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Ms. Wanda L. Waller | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Richard Dunbar | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. James Gunlicks | |Member |
| |Mr. Scott Faught | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that item 5 on his DA Form 2627
(Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ), dated 19 March 2004, be
corrected to show that the imposing commander directed that the original DA
Form 2627 be filed in the restricted fiche of his Official Military
Personnel File (OMPF).
2. The applicant states the imposing commander's intent was to place the
DA Form 2627 in his restricted fiche; however, the commander inadvertently
placed the "X" in the wrong box.
3. The applicant provides a statement from the imposing commander and a
copy of the DA Form 2627.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant was serving as a sergeant assigned to the 500th Military
Police Detachment at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. He is now currently serving
overseas.
2. Item 5 on the applicant's DA Form 2627, dated 19 March 2004, shows an
"X" in both the performance fiche block and the restricted fiche block.
3. In support of his claim, the applicant provided a statement from the
imposing commander. The imposing commander requests that item 5 on the
applicant's DA Form 2627 be corrected to show an "X" in the restricted
fiche block. He states that his intent was to mark the restricted fiche
block but he marked the wrong block. He then attempted to white out the
performance fiche block and put his initials by it, but clearly it did not
happen.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
The statement from the imposing commander is sufficient as a basis for
amending item 5 on the applicant's DA Form 2627, dated 19 March 2004, to
show he directed that the original DA Form 2627 be filed in the restricted
fiche of the applicant's OMPF.
BOARD VOTE:
RD_____ JG______ SF______ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
amending item 5 on the DA Form 2627, dated 19 March 2004, to show the
imposing commander directed that the original DA Form 2627 be filed in the
restricted fiche of the applicant's OMPF.
____Richard Dunbar____
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20050004522 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20051208 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |100.0000 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009382C070206
Item 5 on the applicant's DA Form 2627, dated 21 August 2000, shows that the imposing commander marked an "X" in the performance fiche block (i.e., to file the DA Form 2627 in the performance fiche of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF)). Evidence of record shows at the time the non-judicial punishment was imposed against the applicant he held rank of SGT. Army Regulation 27-10 does not allow the original DA Form 2627 on Soldiers SGT and above to be filed in local unit records.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001231C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ) from the restricted portion (R-Fiche) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The Military Justice regulation further stipulates that, with the exception of summarized proceedings, Article 15 proceedings are recorded on a DA Form 2627, which will be filed in either the P-Fiche or R-Fiche of the OMPF on those Soldiers in the rank of sergeant and above. The evidence of record...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069672C070402
The applicant requests, in effect, that two Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ (DA Form 2627) be removed from the restricted fiche (R-Fiche) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Therefore, the Board concludes, given the minor nature of the offense for which the applicant accepted the NJP, that these current standards should be applied and that it would be appropriate to remove the DA Form 2627, dated 10 April 1987, from his OMPF at this time. However, the evidence of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011739C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ), from his military service record. The evidence of record shows that the written reprimand that is filed in the performance section of the applicant's OMPF was issued as part of the Article 15 punishment. The Board notes the applicant’s successful duty performance since the incident; however, it finds this is not sufficiently mitigating evidence to warrant removal of the properly...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067603C070402
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070500C070402
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that a record of nonjudicial punishment (NJP), Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ (DA Form 2627), be removed from or moved to the restricted portion (R-Fiche) of her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002083390C070215
APPLICANT REQUESTS: The removal of a record of nonjudicial punishment (DA Form 2627) from the restricted fiche of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that the DA Form 2627 dated 16 January 1984 should be removed from the restricted fiche of his OMPF because the intended purpose has been served. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013387C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, transfer of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ), from the performance to the restricted section of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 18 September 2000, the date of imposition of punishment directing that the DA Form 2627 be filed in the performance fiche of his OMPF. More specifically in this case, the applicant must provide sufficient...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005758
The applicant provides: * DA Form 2627 * DA Form 2627-2 (Record of Supplementary Action Under Article 15, UCMJ) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. b. NJP was imposed against him on 8 June 2011 for violating a lawful general regulation for using bath salts and the issuing commander directed that the original DA Form 2627 be filed in the restricted section of his OMPF. Although the DA Form 2627 imposed on 8 June 2011 was properly filed in the restricted portion of the applicantÂ’s OMPF in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079667C070215
The applicant requests, in effect, that three Records of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ (DA Forms 2627) be removed from the restricted portion (R-Fiche) of his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant was advised by his unit commander that the DA Form 2627 would be filed in the R-fiche portion of his OMPF, and that he had 5 calendar days to appeal the action. However, the evidence of record also confirms that the disposition and filing of the record of NJP accepted by the...