Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003767C070206
Original file (20050003767C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           17 November 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050003767


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Wanda L. Waller               |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Lester Echols                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. John Denning                  |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Jeanette McCants              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he got hit in his left wrist, that he wrapped it
up, and stayed.  He contends that eight others were hit “real bad” and went
home.

3.  The applicant provides no evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on
7 March 1970.  The application submitted in this case is dated 7 March
2005.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant enlisted on 12 July 1968 for a period of 2 years.  He
arrived in Vietnam on 10 March 1969.  He served as an infantryman assigned
to Company A, 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry, 196th Infantry Brigade in
Vietnam from 23 March 1969 through 7 April 1969.  He was assigned to
Company C, 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry, 196th Infantry Brigade in Vietnam
from 8 April 1969 through 1 June 1969.  He was assigned to Company E, 2nd
Battalion, 1st Infantry, 196th Infantry Brigade in Vietnam from 2 June 1969
through 6 March 1970.  On 7 March 1970, the applicant was released from
active duty in the rank of specialist four after completing 1 year, 7
months, and 26 days of creditable active service with no time lost.

4.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows the
National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Parachutist
Badge, two awards of the Overseas Service Bar, the Marksman Marksmanship
Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and the Expert Marksmanship
Qualification Badge with Mortar Bar as authorized awards.

5.  There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the
applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of
hostile action in Vietnam.

6.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not
show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20
is blank.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty
Roster.

7.  Headquarters, Americal Division Special Orders Number 133, dated 13 May
1969, show the applicant received the Combat Infantryman Badge.

8.  There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good
Conduct Medal.  There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by
his chain of command from receiving the Good Conduct Medal.  His records do
not contain any adverse information and he received conduct and efficiency
ratings of “excellent” throughout his service.

9.  Records show the applicant participated in three campaigns during his
assignment in Vietnam.

10.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign
Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units
serving in Vietnam.   This document shows the applicant's unit (2nd
Battalion, 1st Infantry) is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam
Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army
General Orders Number 42, dated 1972.

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent
part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action.
Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the
result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the
medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

12.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and
criteria concerning individual military decorations.  It stated that the
Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted
active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and,
for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June
1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  At the time, a Soldier's
conduct and efficiency ratings must
have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service
except that a service school efficiency rating based upon academic
proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 was
not disqualifying.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal
until the immediate commander made positive recommendation for its award
and until the awarding authority announced the award in General Orders.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the
Vietnam Service Medal.  This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed
Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July
1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or
assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or
directly supporting military operations.

14.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a
bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed
in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service
stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was
wounded or treated for any injuries as a result of hostile action in
Vietnam.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base an
award of the Purple Heart in this case.

2.  Orders show the applicant received the Combat Infantryman Badge.

3.  The applicant was separated in the rank of specialist four with almost
20 months of creditable active service with no time lost.  Therefore, it
appears the applicant met the eligibility criteria for the first award of
the Good Conduct Medal for the period 12 July 1968 through 7 March 1970
based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the
termination of a period of Federal military service.

4.  The applicant served in Vietnam from 10 March 1969 through 7 March 1970
and participated in three campaigns.  Therefore, he is entitled to award of
the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars.

5.  The applicant's unit received the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross
with Palm Unit Citation while he was assigned to it.

6.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error now
under consideration on 7 March 1970; therefore, the time for the applicant
to file a request for correction of any error expired on 6 March 1973.
Although the applicant did not file within the ABCMR's statute of
limitations, it is appropriate to waive failure to timely file based on the
fact there is no statute of limitations on requests for award of the Purple
Heart.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

LE______  JD______  _JM_____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely
file.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army
records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

      a.  awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the
period 12 July 1968 through 7 March 1970; and

      b.  amending his DD Form 214 to add award of the Good Conduct Medal
and to show that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Vietnam
Service Medal with three bronze service stars, and the Republic of Vietnam
Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
award of the Purple Heart.




            __Lester Echols_______
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050003767                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20051117                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0015                                |
|2.                      |107.0000                                |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008484

    Original file (20120008484.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service): Vietnam from 28 July 1970 through 5 January 1971; b. item 38 (Record of Assignments): * duty MOS 11E (Assistant Driver/Gunner) - Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 2nd Battalion, 8th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division, from 11 August through 4 November 1970 * student account - 23rd Administration Replacement Detachment, from 5 to 7 November 1970 * duty MOS 11B (Rifleman) - Company D, 2nd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001632

    Original file (20080001632.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Purple Heart, one Overseas Service Bar, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013233

    Original file (20110013233.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS and was assigned as a rifleman to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size when he was wounded in action. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 20 March 1969 to 21 October 1970; b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002910

    Original file (20140002910.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although wear of multiple awards of this unit citation is not authorized, official military personnel and historical records will indicate all awards received. While he was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 46th Infantry, the unit was awarded the Valorous Unit Award which was awarded for extraordinary heroism in action against an armed enemy of the United States while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing foreign force. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005518

    Original file (20090005518.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his separation document to show two awards of the Purple Heart, the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, and "Overseas Ribbon." Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017094

    Original file (20080017094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s records also show he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 3 November 1967 to 2 November 1968. This document shows that during the applicant's tenure of assignment: a. the 23rd Supply and Transport Battalion was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation, from 1 January 1968 to 31 August 1969, based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 53, dated 1970; b. the 4th Battalion, 31st Infantry, was awarded the Valorous Unit Award from 15 November 1967 to 3 February 1968,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006943

    Original file (20130006943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct the applicant's records to show award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 11 May 1970 through 22 December 1971 (Standard Name Line: SP4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006098

    Original file (20080006098.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show 2 awards of the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal with ”V” Device. The applicant states, in effect, that he should have been awarded 2 Purple Hearts for wounds he received in combat in the Republic of Vietnam, as well as the Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device. There is no evidence in the applicant’s military service records that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019545

    Original file (20120019545.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    f. item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no entry for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Purple Heart, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Valorous Unit Award, and Army Good Conduct Medal. His service record does not include orders for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Purple Heart, or Army Good Conduct Medal. His award of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device clearly shows he was engaged in active ground combat with the enemy while assigned to his infantry unit in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005165C070205

    Original file (20060005165C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 22 September 1969. While the evidence of record is conflicting as to the date the applicant sustained this particular wound (i.e., 4 versus 14 September 1969), the evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was wounded and received treatment for the wounds. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...