Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002369C070206
Original file (20050002369C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           20 October 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050002369


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance            |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John T. Meixell               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. James B. Gunlicks             |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Jeanette R. McCants           |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his reenlistment
contract
(DD Form 4) be corrected to show he reenlisted in January 2005 instead of
December 2004, as is currently listed.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he planned to reenlist on 4 January
2005 for three years.  He states he wanted to wait until that date, because
he would have gone over four years in service for pay purposes, and he
would have been deployed in Iraq, which would have made his bonus tax free.
 He planned on receiving a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) of 2.5A,
which would have allowed a maximum of $20,000.00.  He states that on 30
December 2004, his career counselor notified him that a Military Personnel
(MILPER) Message (MSG) just issued lowered his bonus authorization to an
SRB of 1.5A, effective
1 January 2005.  On 6 January 2005, MILPER MSG 05-004 was released and
indicated that his SRB rate was not scheduled to be lowered until 30
January 2005, which means he remained eligible for bonus on the date and
under the circumstances he originally planned on.

3.  The applicant provides a self-authored statement and MILPER MSGs 04-355
and 05-004 in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  As of the date of his application to the Board, the applicant was
serving on active duty, in the rank of sergeant (SGT).

2.  On 30 December 2004, the applicant reenlisted for three years.

3.  In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was
obtained from the Human Resources Command (HRC) Chief, Force Alignment
Division.  This official recommended approval of the applicant request to
cancel his three-year reenlistment of 30 December 2004.  He indicated that
it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s reenlistment contract to
show he reenlisted on 7 January 2005, for three years.  He also indicated
that the annexes to the applicant’s reenlistment contract should be
corrected to show he was entitled to a SRB of 2.5A and to a lump sum
payment in accordance with MILPER MSG 05-004.  He further commented that
the local finance office should recalculate and pay or recoup any portion
of the applicant’s reenlistment bonus for his
30 December 2004 reenlistment.   On 16 February 2005, the applicant was
provided a copy of the HRC advisory opinion in order to have the
opportunity to respond.  To date, he has failed to reply.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request to correct his record to show he reenlisted in
January 2005, as opposed to December 2004 was carefully considered and
found to have merit.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant
reenlisted early in order to obtain the most favorable bonus conditions
based on erroneous information and advise he received regarding his bonus
entitlement.

2.  As confirmed by the HRC advisory opinion, the applicant was entitled to
receive the 2.5 A SRB lump sum payment he expected in conjunction with his
reenlistment in January 2005.  Therefore, given this was his original
intent, his record should be corrected to show he reenlisted on 7 January
2005, instead of 30 December 2004, and by providing him the bonus to which
he was entitled on that date based on his assignment location at the time.


BOARD VOTE:

___JTM__  ___JBG   ___JRM__  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
showing he reenlisted for three years on 7 January 2005, instead of
30 December 2004, and by providing him the 2.5A SRB to which he was
entitled based on his assignment location on the date of his reenlistment,
minus any reenlistment bonus he received in connection with his voided 30
December 2004 reenlistment.




            ____John T. Meixell______
                    CHAIRPERSON


                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050002369                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |2005/10/20                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |112.1100                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012305

    Original file (20060012305.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A memorandum dated 20 November 2002 shows that the applicant’s request to receive CSRB in MOS 18F was approved. The summary sheet explained that “due to subsequent changes to the CSRB Program, eligible Soldiers were authorized to add 1 or more years to their original CSRB obligation and be paid the new amount for the additional obligation.” However, because the applicant request for an additional 1 year CSRB is dated 21 November 2005, after the end of his previous CSRB obligation, it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015880

    Original file (20060015880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory opinion further indicates that regarding cases when Soldiers are separated for an unfulfilled contract or in doubtful cases, commanders have the option to request a waiver of recoupment provisions. Memoranda provided by the applicant's chain of command and career counselor both concur that the Department of the Army breached the terms of the applicant's reenlistment contract; therefore, the applicant is not obligated to repay the reenlistment bonus. Considering there is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008105

    Original file (20080008105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests payment of her Selected Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). However, there is no evidence that the applicant's reenlistment contract was voided and, as noted above, she continued to serve in AGR until she was notified of medical disqualification. Although, HRC- St. Louis erroneously gave her a Selective Service Reenlistment Bonus Control Number when her primary MOS was not an authorized specialty for entitlement to the bonus, she had the opportunity to exercise the option to...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2008-041

    Original file (2008-041.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated September 11, 2008, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he elected to have his Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) paid to him in a lump sum. When the applicant reenlisted on June 16, 2007, he had the option under ALCOAST 304/07 issued on June 15, 2007 of having his SRB paid in a lump sum or in installments. Under the ALCOAST, the Coast Guard...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013472

    Original file (20140013472.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He provides an Eligibility Bonus Work Sheet for AGR Bonus for Indefinite, undated, wherein it shows his adjusted basic active service date (BASD) was 30 August 2000, his ETS date had been 23 August 2006, he would reach 18 years of service on 30 August 2018, and the total time he would be paid the SRB was for 12 years and 7 days of service (date of 18 years of service minus reenlistment date, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007830

    Original file (20110007830.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, payment of the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) guaranteed in her 28 April 2010 DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract). The applicant states: a. she was told that she is not eligible for an SRB because she exceeded the 14 years or less guideline under the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) by 2 weeks; b. she was issued a Bonus Control Number (BCN) and a Reenlistment Control Number (RCN); c. she attempted to reenlist in January 2010 and the reenlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010292

    Original file (20090010292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records further show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years in the rank/grade of specialist/E-4 on 29 June 2005. He subsequently completed OCS at Fort Benning, GA, from 29 June 2005 to 14 December 2005 and was honorably discharged on 14 December 2005 for the purpose of accepting a commission in the Army. The applicant enlisted on 10 May 2005 under an enlistment program that became effective on 11 April 2005; he enlisted in the Regular Army under the OCS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021201

    Original file (20140021201.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests payment of an enlistment or seasonal bonus for his Regular Army enlistment in 2005. The applicant states he enlisted in the Reserve Component (RC) to Active Component (AC) under Military Personnel (MILPER) Message 05-143, dated 16 June 2005, subject: Enlistment of Mobilized USAR or Army National Guard Soldiers into the Regular Army. MILPER Message 05-241, dated 3 October 2005, subject: Enlistment Bonus Program Changes, stated effective 3 October 2005, a prior service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014831

    Original file (20120014831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He provides: * DA Forms 3286 (Statement for Enlistment – U.S. Army Enlistment Program), dated 29 March 2006 and 7 February 2008 * DA Form 3340-R (Request for Reenlistment or Extension in the RA) * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 7 February 2008 * DA Form 4789 (Statement of Entitlement to Selective Reenlistment Bonus) * Email, dated 15 and 16...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006483

    Original file (20080006483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He also requests correction of his enlistment contract to show he enlisted in the rank of Sergeant First Class (SFC)/pay grade E-7 and he was authorized a bonus. The evidence of record also shows the applicant was approved for enlistment as a mobilized RC Soldier into the RA in the rank of SSG (E-6) with PMOS 88N on 26 July 2006.