RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 23 November 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050001942
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. John Slone | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Patrick H. McGann, Jr. | |Member |
| |Mr. Larry Olson | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded in Vietnam (1969-
1970) when he received shrapnel wounds to the buttocks. He goes on to
state that he was evacuated from the fire-base for medical treatment with
other members of his squad and although he was treated, the shrapnel was
never removed and still remains in his buttocks to this day. The shrapnel
has been located by x-rays performed by the Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA). He further states that he has never received a Purple Heart and
desires that error to be corrected at this time.
3. The applicant provides a copy of a letter from the VA indicating the
presence of metallic objects in the soft tissues of his buttocks.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 31 May 1990. The application submitted in this case is dated 4
November 2004 and was received on 4 February 2005.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. He was inducted in Guam on 10 November 1964 and remained on active duty
as a combat engineer through a series of continuous reenlistments.
4. He served in Vietnam from 13 September 1967 to 12 September 1968 in the
pay grade of E-5 and was assigned to Company B, 86th Engineer Battalion.
He served in Vietnam again from 7 October 1969 to 6 October 1970 with the
321st Artillery Regiment.
5. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-7 on 18 September 1976 and to the
pay grade of E-8 on 10 August 1982.
6. On 31 May 1990, he was honorably released from active duty and was
transferred to the Retired List effective 1 June 1990. He had served 25
years, 6 months, and 21 days of total active service.
7. A review of the available records, as well as the Vietnam Casualty
Listing fails to show any indication that the applicant was wounded as a
result of enemy action or that he was treated for any such wounds/injuries.
There is also no indication that he was ever reported as a casualty.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple
Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.
Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a
result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a
medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of
official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s contention has been noted. However, he has failed to
show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record sufficient
evidence to establish that he was injured as a result of enemy action and
that he received treatment for that injury.
2. Therefore, absent evidence to show that he was wounded as a result of
enemy action and the treatment was made a matter of record, there appears
to be no basis to award him the Purple Heart at this time.
3. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
4. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 31 May 1990; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on 30 May 1993. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-
year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation
or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
failure to timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
_JS_____ __PM____ _LJO___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
2. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law. Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_____John Slone_______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20050001942 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON |YYYYMMDD |
|DATE BOARDED |20051123 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |YYYYMMDD |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR . . . . . |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |(DENY) |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES |61/PH |
|1.107.0015 | |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010605
Counsel adds that during the Board's last consideration of the applicant's case, the analyst who wrote the case stated the evidence provided was determined to be sufficient to show that he met the criteria for award of the Purple Heart. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Numbers AR20050001942 on 23 November 2005 and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016109
He departed Vietnam en-route to the United States on 10 February 1970. Although he provides evidence showing he was treated for a shrapnel wound to his buttock, there is no evidence in the available record, nor has the applicant provided any evidence showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003239
The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Records show that the applicant participated in eight campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012445
A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. The military medical records the applicant provides show he received a shrapnel wound in the buttocks on 10 December 1967 and that he received medical treatment for the wound. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017672
He states he received a blast injury from enemy explosives while serving in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. While the attending medic provided a statement which shows the blast was a result of explosive devices planted by the enemy, his statement alone does not provide the conclusive evidence necessary to support award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002056
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 August 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070002056 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Army Regulation 600-8-22, as amended, provides that the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 through 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 through 14 August...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002073
The only available medical records are those provided by the applicant. In a letter of support for the applicant, R____ A. W____ states that he was the company medic serving with the applicant when the applicant received a small arms or shrapnel wound during a firefight. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 2-8, provides that the Purple Heart is awarded to an individual who is wounded in any action against an enemy of the United States, in any action with an opposing armed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005454
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence he was awarded the Purple Heart. The medical records that the applicant provides show he was wounded in action on 9 June 1969 when he sustained injuries to his neck and right elbow and a fragment wound to his left hip.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018362
The applicant provides one page of a VA Rating Decision, dated 17 November 1976, wherein it stated the applicant served in Vietnam for 11 months and 15 days and he stated while on patrol duty in 1967 he was struck in the left buttock by a fragment of an exploding grenade. The criteria for award of the Purple Heart requires the submission of substantiating evidence to verify that a Soldier received a wound/injury as the result of hostile action, the wound/injury required medical treatment by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018985
It states that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the...