Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000385C070206
Original file (20050000385C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:          18 August 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20050000385


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Wanda L. Waller               |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. James Vick                    |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Ronald Weaver                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Robert Rogers                 |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states there is no mention of the Purple Heart on his DD
Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) which he received for being
wounded in combat.  He contends he “owns” a Purple Heart and has scars on
his legs from gunshot wounds in Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides no evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on
6 August 1971.  The application submitted in this case is dated 21 December
2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant was inducted on 17 September 1969.  He arrived in Vietnam
on 5 December 1970.  He was assigned to Company C, 1st Battalion, 11th
Infantry, 1st Brigade of the 5th Infantry Division in Vietnam from 26
December 1970 through 5 August 1971.  On 6 August 1971, the applicant was
released from active duty in the rank of sergeant after completing 1 year,
10 months, and 20 days of creditable active service with no time lost.

4.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal,
the Vietnam Service Medal, the Bronze Star Medal, the Combat Infantryman
Badge, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
as authorized awards.

5.  There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the
applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of
hostile action in Vietnam.

6.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not
show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20
is blank.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty
Roster.

7.  There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good
Conduct Medal.  There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by
his chain of command from receiving the Good Conduct Medal.  His records do
not contain any adverse information and he received conduct and efficiency
ratings of “excellent” throughout his service.

8.  Records show the applicant participated in two campaigns during his
assignment in Vietnam.

9.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, 1974, announced award
of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to
Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units
during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters,
U.S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965
to
28 March 1973.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent
part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of
hostile action.
Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the
result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the
medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

11.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and
criteria concerning individual military decorations.  It stated that the
Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted
active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and,
for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June
1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  At the time, a Soldier's
conduct and efficiency ratings must
have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service
except that a service school efficiency rating based upon academic
proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 was
not disqualifying.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal
until the immediate commander made positive recommendation for its award
and until the awarding authority announced the award in General Orders.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, for award of the
Vietnam Campaign Medal.  This medal was awarded by the Government of
Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for
qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through
28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for
6 months or more.  Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of
the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat
support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a
bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed
in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service
stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant contends that he was wounded in combat in
Vietnam, there is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was
wounded or treated for any injuries as a result of hostile action in
Vietnam.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base an
award of the Purple Heart in this case.

2.  The applicant was separated in the rank of sergeant with almost 2 years
of creditable active service with no time lost.  Therefore, it appears the
applicant met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Good
Conduct Medal for the period 17 September 1969 through 6 August 1971 based
on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination
of a period of Federal military service.

3.  The applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in
Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two
bronze service stars.

4.  The applicant served a period of qualifying service for award of the
Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960.

5.  The Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation was
awarded to all units which served in Vietnam.

6.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error now
under consideration on 6 August 1971; therefore, the time for the applicant
to file a request for correction of any error expired on 5 August 1974.
Although the applicant did not file within the ABCMR's statute of
limitations, it is appropriate to waive failure to timely file based on the
fact there is no statute of limitations on requests for award of the Purple
Heart.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT RELIEF

JV______  RW____  RR______  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely
file.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army
records of the individual concerned be corrected:

      a.  by awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the
period 17 September 1969 through 6 August 1971; and


      b.  by amending his DD Form 214 to add the Good Conduct Medal and to
show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service
stars, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960, and the
Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
award of the Purple Heart.




            __James Vick_________
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20050000385                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050818                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107.0015                                |
|2.                      |107.0000                                |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010436C070208

    Original file (20040010436C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's service personnel records show he served a period of qualifying service in Vietnam and is entitled to award of the Vietnam Service Medal. Evidence of record also shows that the applicant participated in one campaign during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing one award of the Purple Heart, award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device (First Oak Leaf...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087483C070212

    Original file (2003087483C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. The applicant’s DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086140C070212

    Original file (2003086140C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. The applicant’s service personnel records show that he participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000556C070205

    Original file (20060000556C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device, and the Purple Heart. The applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005968C070205

    Original file (20060005968C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 December 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060005968 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000346C070206

    Original file (20050000346C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's DD Form 214 with the ending period 23 February 1968 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026102

    Original file (20100026102.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and correct his DD Form 214 to show his medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073720C070403

    Original file (2002073720C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show award of the Purple Heart, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Good Conduct Medal. The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show the Purple Heart, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal or the Good Conduct Medal as authorized awards. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016917

    Original file (20060016917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. The applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008711C070208

    Original file (20040008711C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that award of Purple Heart be shown on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart and the Good Conduct Medal; and b. showing that, in addition to the awards...