Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106640C070208
Original file (2004106640C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           16 December 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR2004106640


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Yolanda Maldonado             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Maribeth Love                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Ronald J. Weaver              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the authority and reason for separation on
his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of
Service) be changed to read:  "Para 8-27k, NGR 600-200/Failure to obtain an
assignment to a unit vacancy."

2.  The applicant states that he was transferred to an inactive status
because he could not find a unit in the States before his conditional
release expired.  Since he was in an inactive status, he thought there was
no reason for attending [muster drills].

3.  The applicant provides an NGB Form 22 for the period ending 20 November
1979 and one for the period ending 1 May 1993; discharge orders dated
       12 February 1998; an Army National Guard Retirement Points History
Statement; and an enlistment contract dated 24 November 1993.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of alleged injustice which
occurred on 20 November 1997.  The application submitted in this case is
dated 1 April 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant initially enlisted in the Reserve Components on 27
January 1989.  He enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 24 November
1993 for 4 years.

4.  On 2 May 1995, the applicant requested transfer to the Inactive
National Guard (ING) for one year.  He was transferred to the ING effective
31 May 1995.

5.  On 20 November 1997, 3 days prior to his normal expiration term of
service (ETS), the applicant was honorably discharged from the ARNG and
transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement)
under the
provisions of National Guard Regulation 600-200, paragraph 8-27v, due to
failure to report to/for annual Inactive National Guard muster.  He was
given a reenlistment (RE) code of 3.

6.  National Guard Regulation 614-1 prescribes policies and procedures for
effective management of Soldiers in the ING and for transfer into and out
of the ING.  It states that the ING is an administrative category that
allows Soldiers in the ARNG to remain in the ARNG when for some reason they
are unable to participate satisfactorily in regularly scheduled training
assemblies and/or annual training.  All units that have ING Soldiers
assigned will conduct an annual ING muster assembly concurrently with a
regularly scheduled unit training assembly.  Attendance of all ING Soldiers
is mandatory unless out of State or country due to temporary employment,
residency, or missionary work.

7.  National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations),
paragraph 8-3d states that ARNG Soldiers who have less than 3 months to
serve on their statutory or contractual obligation will be concurrently
discharged.   Paragraph 8-26x is the authority for discharging a Soldier
upon expiration of service obligation.

8.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from
the Chief, Personnel Division, NGB.  That office noted the Puerto Rico ARNG
had retained the applicant in the ING until 3 days prior to his ETS date
and then discharged him with a reenlistment code of 3 rather than let his
enlistment expire and issue an RE code of 1.  That office recommended the
applicant's NGB Form 22 be amended to read "ETS" as the reason for
discharge with an RE code of 1.

9.  A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for
response.  On 11 July 2004, he concurred with the advisory opinion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requested transfer to the ING for one year and he was so
transferred effective 31 May 1995.  It appears he believed he was not
required to attend annual muster.  Nevertheless, he was retained in the ING
for an additional 18 months and discharged from the ARNG and transferred to
the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) only 3 days short of his normal ETS.

2.  Since the Puerto Rico ARNG allowed the applicant to remain in the ING
until he was only 3 days of short of his contractual obligation (and not
having a statutory obligation), it would be equitable to show that he was
discharged from
the ARNG and the USAR under the provisions of National Guard Regulation
600-200, paragraph 8-26x upon the completion of his required service
obligation.

BOARD VOTE:

__ym____  __ml____  __rjw___  GRANT RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that the NGB Form 22 for the period ending 20
November 1997 of the individual concerned be corrected:

     a.  in the heading by showing he was discharged from the Army National
Guard of Puerto Rico and as a Reserve of the Army;

     b.  in item 9 (Command to Which Transferred) to show "NA";

     c.  in item 23 to show "PARA 8-26x, NGR 600-200, COMPLETION OF
REQUIRED SERVICE OBLIGATION; and

     d.  in item 26 (Reenlistment Eligibility) to delete "EL-R RE-3" and to
show "RE-1."




            __Yolanda Maldonado___
                    CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004106640                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20041216                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |110.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019892

    Original file (20130019892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he has 20 years of creditable service for retirement. The applicant provides copies of: * his history of events while in the ARNG, dated 21 October 2013 * a 21 October 2010 Army Review Boards Agency letter * a 2 July 2013 Connecticut National Guard letter * 22 August 2013 congressional correspondence * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) ending 26 November 1973 * National Guard...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080016245

    Original file (AR20080016245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military personnel records show he enlisted in the ARNGUS and PRARNG for a period of 6 years on 12 January 1972 and was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) on 25 May 1972. The evidence of record shows that, on 13 July 2007, orders were issued that discharged the applicant from the ARNGUS and PRARNG on 13 May 2007 and transferred him to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve) effective 14 May 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011334

    Original file (20110011334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states: * the applicant served in the Louisiana Army National Guard (LAARNG) from 2 April 1993 to 2 April 1997, during which time he was promoted to captain (CPT) on 7 August 1994 * he was transferred to the ING on 2 April 1997 and to the IRR on 15 June 2003 * he rejoined the LAARNG on 15 June 2004 * he continued his service in the ARNG and he was ultimately promoted to MAJ in the USAR on 15 August 2008 * he was improperly placed in the ING in 1997 and when the Army noticed the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002837

    Original file (20090002837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the under other than honorable conditions discharge that she received from the Army National Guard (ARNG) be upgraded to an honorable discharge. There is no evidence in the applicant's records that show she fulfilled the requirements of the conditional release. The applicant’s National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows she was separated with an under other than honorable conditions discharge, due to unsatisfactory...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068816C070402

    Original file (2002068816C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders Number 018-010, dated 18 January 2001, issued by the Military Department of Indiana, directs that the applicant be discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve member of the Army, effective 18 December 2000. Further, the Board finds an unintentional injustice was served upon the applicant as a result of her never being properly counseled on the service remaining requirement for her to be transferred to the USAR, and because she was never afforded the opportunity to take the necessary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086716C070212

    Original file (2003086716C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant has not presented and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018506

    Original file (20130018506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 January 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130018506 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests payment of his Reenlistment/Extension Bonus (REB) in the amount of $5,000.00. The evidence of record shows he enlisted in the MTARNG on 20 October 2006.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007027

    Original file (20070007027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 October 1991, the company commander issued a memorandum of intent to the applicant, which shows that the commander initiated administrative action to separate the applicant from the Virginia Army National Guard for unsatisfactory performance because he accrued more than nine unexcused absences from unit training assemblies within a one-year period. Due to his lack of response, the applicant waived his right to be considered by an Administrative Separation Board and was discharged on...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130010974

    Original file (AR20130010974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 11 April 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130010974 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. On 20 June 2011, The Adjutant General, Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009957

    Original file (20140009957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 June 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140009957 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Counsel requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of the applicant's military records by granting him a special selection board (SSB) or, in the alternative, changing his date of promotion to major (MAJ) to 10 September 2007. The guidance addressing individuals who are not eligible for transfer to the ING is stated in paragraph 4-3(a) as "officers who...