Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105274C070208
Original file (2004105274C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:         21 DECEMBER 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR2004105274


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock             |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Fred Eichorn                  |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Paul Smith                    |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Semma Salter                  |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the 21 October 1977 Physical Evaluation
Board (PEB) proceedings (DA Form 199) be corrected by checking item 10 on
that form to show that his permanent retirement was based on a disability
resulting from injury or disease received in line of duty as a direct
result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and
incurred in line of duty during a period of war as defined by law.

2.  The applicant states that his 16 July 1974 DA Form 199 showing that he
was placed on the TDRL (temporary disability retired list) indicated that
his retirement showed that it was based on "a disability resulting from …"
(as indicated above). The block mark so indicating was overlooked on the 21
October 1977               DA Form 199.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of both DA Forms 199 and a copy of his
     17 August 1974 DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged (error or
injustice) which occurred on 21 October 1977.  The application submitted in
this case is dated      3 March 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  On 30 June 1969 the applicant was appointed as a Reserve warrant
officer.  He served in Vietnam as a helicopter pilot.  His awards include
the Army Aviator Badge, Air Medal (25th award with "V" device), Bronze Star
Medal, Distinguished Flying Cross, and Silver Star.

4.  An 8 July 1974 Medical Evaluation Board narrative summary shows that
the applicant was a pilot of a helicopter which crashed about 100 feet
during an air show near Poterville, California about 1500 hours on 8 June
1974.  He underwent treatment and surgery.  His condition at the time of
the MEB was diagnosed as facture, compression, vertebra T12, no major
artery involvement but with nerve involvement; and radiculopathy, cauda
equine, secondary to the first diagnosis, manifested by severe, diffuse
weakness of both lower extremities, but with both normal bowel and bladder
function.  The summary showed that he underwent a laminectomy and fusion
T11 through L1 with a bone graft from the right posterior iliac crest on 17
January 1974.  The MEB recommended that the applicant be referred to a PEB.

5.  On 16 July 1974 a PEB recommended that the applicant be placed on the
TDRL because of his disabilities with a 100 percent disability rating.  The
PEB proceedings (DA Form 199) show that item 10 on that form was checked to
show that his retirement "is based on disability resulting…"

6.  The applicant was placed on the TDRL on 16 August 1974.

7.  On 21 October 1977 a PEB recommended that the applicant be permanently
retired from the service with a disability rating of 50 percent.  Item 10
of the PEB proceedings was not checked.

8.  The applicant was removed from the TDRL on 30 November 1977 and
permanently retired with a 50 percent disability rating on 1 December 1977.


9.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement,
or Separation), then in effect, states that when a PEB recommends that a
member be permanently retired from the service, an entry in item 10 of DA
Form 199 will be made only if the DA Form 199 placing the member on the
TDRL did not indicate a finding.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows that the applicant's disabilities did result from
injuries received in line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or
caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in line of duty during a
period of war as defined by law.  The appropriate entry was made in item 10
of the 16 July 1974 PEB proceedings (DA Form 199), placing him on the TDRL.


2.  The applicant's 21 October 1977 DA Form 199 is not erroneous.  Item 10
of that form was not overlooked.  Item 10 is required to be completed only
if not checked when he was placed on the TDRL.  Item 10 was marked when he
was placed on the TDRL.  Consequently, there is no error in this case.
Therefore, his request to correct his 21 October 1977 DA Form 199 is not
warranted.

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 21 October 1977; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on         20 October 1980.  However, the applicant did
not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a
compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest
of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__FE  ___  ___PS __  ___SS __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.





                            ______Fred Eichorn_______
                                      CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004105274                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20041221                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |108.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007032C070205

    Original file (20060007032C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. After the formal hearing, the board carefully considered all of the available evidence in his case and found that the applicant was physically unfit because of service connected disability, and recommended that he be placed on the TDRL and rated 40 percent disabled. The applicant states that the injury or disease...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011668

    Original file (20100011668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 10 of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated 15 February 1972, to show he was placed on disability because of an injury received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict. On 1 February 1970 and 7 July 1970, medical evaluation boards found him medically unfit due to injuries resulting from multiple fragment wounds sustained on 15 March 1969 while in the RVN during enemy mortar attacks. The DA Form 199,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008239

    Original file (20110008239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) to show the following entries as "Yes" instead of "No": a. On 24 March 2003, he injured his knee while playing basketball at Fort Polk, LA, and he was treated at Bayne-Jones Army Community Hospital, AR. The applicant's DA Form 199 contains the following entries in item 10 (If Retired Because of Disability, the Board Makes the Recommended Finding that): * the Soldier's retirement is not based...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009738

    Original file (20120009738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 199 contains the following entries in item 10 (If Retired Because of Disability, the Board Makes the Recommended Finding that): a. The orders stated: * Disability is based on injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in the line of duty during a period of war as defined by law: Yes * Member of an armed force on 24 September 1975: "No" * Disability resulted from a combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018082

    Original file (20140018082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his retirement orders to show his disability did (instead of did not) result from a combat-related injury. The applicant states: * His Line of Duty (LOD) established that his injuries occurred during deployment to Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) from 2005 to 2006 * They occurred in a combat situation and should be considered combat-related and in direct result of armed conflict/war * His retirement orders state that his injuries were not combat-related; he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010606

    Original file (20140010606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) * DA Form 3947 (Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Proceedings) * Multiple Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) * DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * Multiple consults, sick call slips, and chronological records of medical care * Other service and civilian medical records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Although the PEB recommended his separation with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089919C070403

    Original file (2003089919C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board ultimately concluded that the applicant was physically unfit to perform his duties at the time of his release from active duty in May 1970 and corrected his records to show that he was retired from active duty on 16 May 1970 and his name placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). Because the action was accomplished by the Board no Department of the Army Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board Proceedings) was completed and hence no determination was made concerning...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087505C070212

    Original file (2003087505C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS : Reconsideration of his request to correct item 10 on his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board Proceedings) to show that his disability resulted from an injury or disease received in the line of duty as a direct result of armed conflict. The 10 July 1973 version of the VA Presumptions/Approved Codes listing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015503

    Original file (20080015503.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his 16 December 1971 (1 November 1969 edition) AGPZ Form (Data for Retired Pay) to show in Item 29 (Physical Disability Information Pertinent to the Dual Compensation Act of 1964) that he was “retired for disability caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in line of duty during a period of war.” In effect, the applicant seeks to qualify for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Following the 18 October 1971 PEB, a new AGPZ Form 977, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019117

    Original file (20080019117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. The evidence of record shows a PEB reviewed the applicant's medical condition on 23 May 2005 and on 11 January 2007. An informal PEB that convened on 19 August 2008 found the applicant...