RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 09 NOVEMBER 2004
DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004104829
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Mark Manning | |Chairperson |
| |Ms. Linda Simmons | |Member |
| |Mr. Leonard Hassell | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests
2. The applicant states
3. The applicant provides
COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:
1. Counsel requests
2. Counsel states
3. Counsel provides
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1.
2.
3.
4.
X.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1.
2.
X.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___MM _ ___LS___ ___LH __ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.
______Mark Manning_______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR2004104829 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON |YYYYMMDD |
|DATE BOARDED |20041109 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |YYYYMMDD |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR . . . . . |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |108.00 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010051
The applicant's military records are not available for review. When separation for unfitness was warranted, an undesirable discharge was normally issued. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002163
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 06 March 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002163 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his records be corrected by removing his DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for the period 14 July 2004 to 29 July 2004 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF)....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000819
The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 2627, Record of Proceedings, Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), dated 7 January 2006, from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Records show that the applicant was punished under the provisions of Article 15 of the UCMJ for disobeying a lawful order to write a Developmental Counseling Statement on an enlisted Soldier, on or about 27 December 2005. Evidence clearly shows that the applicant did not follow a direct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011933
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040005656C070208
In May 2004, after the applicant’s last temporary physical profile expired, the applicant’s unit commander initiated action to administratively separate her from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, because the applicant had failed the APFT on six different occasions. The applicant’s commander recommended that the applicant received a general discharge. However, the separation authority approved the commander’s recommendation and on 2 June 2004...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001467C070205
The spouse MUST NOT SIGN this statement before the member makes the SBP election and signs the form. By a letter, dated 11 August 2006, the Board analyst requested that the applicant clarify whether her spouse had concurred with her election not to participate in the SBP or with her election to participate in the SBP based on full gross pay without supplemental SBP. The applicant’s spouse submitted a written statement on 24 August 2006 concurring with the applicant’s election not to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088096C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show that he served 2 years on active duty. It would be equitable to now show the applicant was placed on 2 days excess leave, was separated on 26 July 1964, and to amend his DD Form 214 to show he separated on 26 July 1964 after completing 2...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105880C070208
The applicant provides COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: 1. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. ______ John Slone_______ CHAIRPERSON INDEX |CASE ID |AR2004105880 | |SUFFIX | | |RECON |YYYYMMDD | |DATE BOARDED |20041026 | |TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) | |DATE OF DISCHARGE |YYYYMMDD | |DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR .
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009761C070206
The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for lumbosacral or cervical strain be approved for Combat- Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application and select military and VA records. If the applicant wishes additional VA rated disabilities to be considered for CRSC, he must first submit a rating request to the VA and, if approved, submit a request for CRSC for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012112
x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The MGIB provides a program of education benefits to individuals who enter active duty for the first time after 30 June 1985 and receive an honorable discharge. There is no evidence to show the applicant has been denied MGIB benefits based upon this entry on his DD Form 214.