Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101821C070208
Original file (2004101821C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            2 September 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:    AR2004101821


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance            |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Walter T. Morrison            |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. William D. Powers             |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Ronald J. Weaver              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD
Form 214) be corrected to reflect his character of service as honorable.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the Character of Service block of
his
7 February 1950 DD Form 214 contains the entry “Certificate of Service”
when it should in fact read honorable.  He claims a correction to the
characterization of his active duty service will allow him to receive the
veterans’ benefits to which he is entitled based on his honorable active
duty service.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of an Honorable Discharge Certificate in
support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of alleged error or injustice
that occurred on 7 February 1950.  The application submitted in this case
is dated
13 November 2003.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for
review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records
at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the
applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there
were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board
to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.  This case is being
considered using reconstructed records that primarily consist of the
applicant’s DD Form 214 and the Honorable Discharge Certificate provided by
the applicant.

4.  The DD Form 214 provided by the applicant confirms that he was inducted
into the Army and entered active duty on 20 January 1949.  It further shows
that he attained the rank of corporal (CPL) on 19 January 1950 and that he
held that rank upon his release from active duty (REFRAD) on 7 February
1950.

5.  The applicant’s separation document further shows that on 7 February
1950, he was REFRAD by reason of convenience of the government and
transferred to the Army Reserve for a period of five years.  The DD Form
214 also shows that at the time of his REFRAD, he had completed 1 year and
18 days of active military service.

6.  The specific facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s
discharge processing are not on file and his DD Form 214 contains a
character of service entry that states “Certificate of Service”.

7.  The Honorable Discharge Certificate provided by the applicant indicates
he was inducted on 20 January 1949 and transferred to the Army Reserve on
8 February 1950.  It further shows that on 18 March 1954, he was honorably
discharged from the Army Reserve.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents that must be
prepared for soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty
service, or control of the Active Army.  It also establishes standardized
policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contains
guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The guidance provided for
the Character of Service block states, in pertinent part, that a correct
character of service entry is vital since it affects a soldiers'
eligibility for post-service benefits.  The regulation in effect at the
time of the applicant’s REFRAD provided for issuing a Certificate of
Service to members separated by reason of convenience of the government
with an honorable or under honorable conditions character of service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s claim that his DD Form 214 should accurately reflect
his character of service as honorable was carefully considered and found to
have merit.

2.  The available evidence confirms the applicant was REFRAD for the
convenience of the government and ultimately honorably discharged from the
Army Reserve.

3.  Although the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the
applicant’s separation processing are not on file, the DD Form 214 on file
confirms the applicant was issued a Certificate of Service upon his
separation from active duty.  The regulation in effect at the time
authorized this certificate to be issued to members separated for the
convenience of the government with an honorable or under honorable
character of service.

4.  There is no evidence or indication of derogatory information or
misconduct that would have diminished the quality of the applicant’s
service below that meriting a fully honorable characterization of service.
The fact he was separated in the grade of corporal indicates he committed
no misconduct warranting a reduction in grade.  Further, he ultimately
received an honorable discharge from the Army Reserve.  Thus, it is logical
to conclude that his active duty service was characterized as honorable.
Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his separation document to
reflect his honorable character of service.

BOARD VOTE:

__WTM__  __WDP _  _RJW _ _  GRANT RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by amending his 7 February 1950 DD Form
214 by deleting the current entry in the “Character of Separation” block
and replacing it with the entry “Honorable”; and by providing him a
corrected separation document that reflects this change.




            _WALTER T. MORRISON__
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004101821                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |2004/09/DD                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |1950/02/07                              |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |SR 615-363-5                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |Convenience of the Government           |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.  1021 |100.0000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002085638C070215

    Original file (2002085638C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The regulation states that an individual separated under this regulation will be furnished an honorable or general discharge. The Board considered the applicant's request to change his discharge to Army Regulation 615-365 or Army Regulation 615-360. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that the reason and authority for separation issued to him was in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005354

    Original file (20080005354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was honorably separated with a medical discharge. The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show he was medically separated from the Army with an honorable discharge because he served honorably in the U.S. Army from 5 January 1949 to 4 January 1950.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003049

    Original file (0003049.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 8 days of total active service. The Good Conduct Medal (GCM) is awarded upon completion of three years of honorable service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged on 27 August 1949, rather than 4 August 1949, and awarded the Good Conduct Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000337

    Original file (20140000337.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An NGB Form 22E (Report of Separation and Record of Service) effective 31 August 2002 shows his date of birth as 20 October 1949. The available evidence of record shows the applicant served in the AUS from 3 November 1970 to his REFRAD on 8 May 1972. In that his military record contains both of these years at various times during his service, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his year of birth as 1949.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052520C070420

    Original file (2001052520C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further states that his rank on his 21 September 1951 DD Form 214 is incorrect; that he was activated as a sergeant; that he served as a sergeant; and that he was discharged as a sergeant on 24 March 1946. On 24 March 1946, the applicant was discharged from the AUS in the rank of sergeant. On 24 March 1949, the applicant was discharged from the ERC in the rank of Corporal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065955C070421

    Original file (2001065955C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect award of the Bronze Star Medal, Silver Star and any other awards he may be entitled to. The Board notes that the applicant's Bronze Star Medal is already reflected on the applicant's 1953 separation document. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing on his 1953 separation document that he was awarded the Silver Star, and is entitled to the National Defense Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057430C070420

    Original file (2001057430C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for several periods of service including for service between 27 June 1950 and 27 July 1954 and for service between 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974. That the applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 September 1952 be corrected to add the Army Good Conduct Medal (2d award) and the National Defense Service Medal. That the applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 16 August 1957 be corrected to add the Army Good Conduct Medal (3d...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000071

    Original file (20140000071.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his date of birth (DOB) as 5 January 1950 instead of 5 January 1949. All of his service personnel records and DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) show his DOB as 5 January 1949.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060808C070421

    Original file (2001060808C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to reflect sufficient Reserve Component service credit to receive retired pay. For the time that the applicant was appointed an officer in the ARNG, 1 June 1955 through 28 February 1959, only the period of 1 June 1955 through 6 June 1956, is credited with retirement points as 1 year creditable for retired pay at age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084675C070212

    Original file (2003084675C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he should not be denied these awards to which he is entitled based on the wounds he received in action during his combat service in Korea. The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Purple Heart, for being wounded in action in Korea on 1 September 1950, the Purple Heart 1 st Oak Leaf Cluster, for...