Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101136C070208
Original file (2004101136C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:



      BOARD DATE:        28 October 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR2004101136


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr.             |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Raymond J. Wagner             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Lawrence Foster               |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Marla J. N. Troup             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his Reserve Officers’ Training
Corps (ROTC) debt be waived.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he requested a waiver of the ROTC
debt so he could enlist but was told that an answer would take at least 90
days and that would have cost him his active duty Marine Corps (USMC) slot.


3.  The applicant provides his Army ROTC scholarship contract and his basic
Marine Corps enlistment contract and a power of attorney authorizing his
mother to prepare and sign documents for him.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military records show he entered a 2-year ROTC
scholarship program on 11 September 2002.  His DA Form 597-3 (ROTC
Scholarship Cadet Contract), provided for up to $17,000.00 in tuition and
fees, a $600.00 annual book and lab fee reimbursement and a $300.00 per
month subsistence allowance.

2.  The ROTC contract also provided for and he agreed that, his
disenrollment would, at the option of the Army, result either in his being
ordered to active duty or that he repay the amount received.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the USMC for 4 years on 15 April 2003.  His
enlistment incentive package included a training of choice option in
infantry and a $50,000.00 College Fund.

4.  On 2 July 2003, he was officially disenrolled from ROTC and offered a
choice of requesting to be ordered to active duty, to pay back the
$7,880.00 already received or to promise to repay that amount.  He promised
to repay the amount plus interest accruing from the date of notification of
the amount.  He was also advised of his right to appeal the amount, but did
not do so.

5.  The college fund is an enlistment incentive program which was available
to regular component enlistees who participated in the Montgomery G.I. Bill
(MGIB). In addition to the monthly monetary educational benefits given to
soldiers who participated in the MGIB, the Services could also provide a
“kicker” in the form of the college fund, which was a set amount of money
which was determined by the length of an enlistment.  Entitlement to the
college fund is contingent on the military occupational specialty needs as
determined by the particular Service.

6.  The MGIB, as outlined in title 38, United States Code, chapter 30,
section 3011, provides for soldiers who entered the service after 30 June
1985, to be automatically enrolled into the MGIB and to contribute
$1,200.00 during their first 12 months service, which is not normally
refundable.  After completion of their service obligation, he or she is
entitled to receive up to $300.00 per month educational benefits for 36
months.  The program is administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA).

7.  In an advisory opinion, the U. S. Army Cadet Command noted that the
applicant's ROTC contract requires either accepting orders to active duty
in the Army or repayment of the cost of his ROTC scholarship.  It also
noted that his enlistment in the USMC violated his contract.  Denial of his
request was recommended.

8.  A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for
comment or rebuttal.  He did not respond within the given time frame.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although not provided for in his ROTC contract, the applicant’s 24
September 2002 enlistment in the USMC served the same purpose as would have
been served had he been ordered to active duty in the U. S. Army, albeit in
a different branch of service.  The Department of Defense is still getting
the benefits of his service (for a period of 4 years whereas his ROTC
contract required only 3 years of active duty).  As a matter of equity it
would be appropriate to consider his enlistment in the U. S. Marine Corps
to have met the active duty obligation required by his ROTC scholarship
contract.

2.  If the applicant fails to complete the period of enlisted service
obligated as a result of his ROTC scholarship either voluntarily or because
of misconduct, his ROTC debt would be required to be recouped on a pro-
rated basis.

BOARD VOTE:

__RJW__  __LF ___  __MJNT _  GRANT RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR200411136                             |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20041028                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |128.1                                   |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011931

    Original file (20060011931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he is currently on active duty in the Army. The applicant provides DA Form 5315-E (US Army Advanced Education Financial Assistance Record); Army Senior Reserve Officers Training Corps Scholarship Cadet Contract; Addendum to Part I Scholarship Contractual Agreement; Headquarters, United Stated Army Cadet Command (USACC) memorandum, dated 6 April 2005, subject: Disenrollment from the U.S. Army ROTC Program; University of Virginia memorandum subject: Disenrollment of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063286C070421

    Original file (2001063286C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 21 July 1997, the applicant signed an Addendum to Part I of his Scholarship Contractual Agreement which acknowledged that as a cadet at the New Mexico Military Institute, Fourth Region ROTC, he was in breach of his 2-year Army ROTC Scholarship Contract; that he understood the terms of his contract; and that he had been advised that he was being provided the opportunity to repay $3,000.00 that the United States had expended in support of his educational assistance in lieu of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018890

    Original file (20080018890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time the applicant entered into the ROTC contract, he further acknowledged his understanding that if he failed to complete the educational requirements of his agreement or was disenrolled from the ROTC program, the Secretary of the Army or his designee could order him to active duty as an enlisted Soldier; or in lieu of being ordered to active duty, he could be required to repay the financial assistance he received through the ROTC program, plus interest. In the notification, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015969

    Original file (20080015969.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract) states that if the cadet were disenrolled from the ROTC program for any reason, the Secretary of the Army could order the cadet to reimburse the United States the dollar amount plus interest that bears the same ratio to the total cost of the scholarship financial assistance provided by the United States to the cadet as the unserved portion of active duty bears to the total period of active duty the cadet agreed to serve or was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003589

    Original file (20110003589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was also notified that as a scholarship cadet, if the disenrollment was approved, she could be called to active duty in an enlisted grade of E-1 or be required to repay scholarship benefits in the amount of $21,605.00 in lieu of call to active duty in fulfillment of her contractual obligations. On 24 January 2008, a Cadet Action Request was initiated by her PMS strongly recommending disenrollment as she requested and that she pay back her scholarship through financial means. On 5 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018311

    Original file (20090018311.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 July 2009, the applicant responded to the advisory opinion by stating, in pertinent part, that at the time of his disenrollment from the ROTC program, the PMS informed him that in addition to electing to pay back his debt or enlisting in military service, he was also afforded a third choice to continue his education and upon graduation enlist in the Army to fulfill his financial obligation incurred as a result of his breached ROTC scholarship contract. The applicant's enlistment and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003301

    Original file (20070003301.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his Reserve Officer's Training Corps (ROTC) scholarship debt be forgiven based on his medical disenrollment from the program due to mental illness and asthma. The memorandum also informed the applicant of his obligation to satisfy the Army through active duty in an enlisted status or repayment of the cost of educational assistance provided by the Army, valued at $26,700.00 at that time. Notwithstanding the expert psychological evaluation conducted at Widener...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03099581C070212

    Original file (03099581C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records show that as part of a scholarship enlistment in the ROTC, the applicant, on 26 October 2000, signed a DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship Cadet Contract), which is an agreement between the Army and a potential ROTC cadet. That command noted that the applicant had breached his contract, that he himself chose to repay the debt owed the government, and that although indications indicated that the applicant was on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011773

    Original file (20130011773.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was disenrolled from ROTC during his third year. b. Paragraph 3-39 states a non-scholarship cadet may be disenrolled by the PMS and a scholarship cadet may be disenrolled only by the Commanding General (CG), ROTC Cadet Command. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was accepted into an Army ROTC scholarship program.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011871

    Original file (20070011871.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    His voluntary enlistment in the USMC is not an authorized remedy for ROTC debt repayment under the terms of his ROTC contract. Further, he enlisted in the USMC some 14 months after his disenrollment from the ROTC program and is now serving on active duty with the USMC for a period of 4 years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the...