RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           29 June 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR2004100392


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Beverly A. Young              |     |Analyst              |


  The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Samuel Crumpler               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Lester Echols                 |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Linda Barker                  |     |Member               |

      The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was
assigned to Battery A, 386th Antiaircraft Artillery Automatic Weapons
Battalion.

2.  The applicant states that his discharge document shows he served with
the
136th Gun Battalion, but it should show the 386th Antiaircraft Artillery
Automatic Weapons Battalion.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record
and Report of Separation) and his Honorable Discharge Certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on
17 December 1945.  The application submitted in this case is dated 21 July
2003.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for
review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records
at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the
applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there
were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board
to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

4.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 20 January 1943 and entered
active duty on 27 January 1943.  He was assigned to the European-African-
Middle Eastern Theater of Operations from 19 February 1944 through
       3 December 1945.  He returned to the United States on 11 December
1945.

5.  The applicant was honorably discharged on 17 December 1945.  His
Honorable Discharge Certificate shows he was assigned to Battery D,
136th Antiaircraft Artillery Gun Battalion prior to being separated from
the Separation Center at Fort Dix, New Jersey on 17 December 1945.


6.  The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was assigned to Battery D,
136th Antiaircraft Artillery Gun Battalion in item 6 (Organization).

7.  The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he received campaign credit for
participation in the Normandy Campaign, the Northern France Campaign, the
Rhineland Campaign, and the Ground Combat European Theater Campaign.

8.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign
Participation Credit Register) dated 6 July 1961 shows, among other
information, campaign credit during World War II.  This document shows that
the
136th Antiaircraft Artillery Gun Battalion received campaign credit for
participation in the Ardennes-Alsace Campaign, the Central Europe Campaign,
the Northern France Campaign and the Rhineland Campaign.

9.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 shows the 386th Antiaircraft
Artillery Automatic Weapons Battalion received campaign credit for
participation in the Central Europe Campaign, the Ground Combat European
Theater Campaign, the Normandy Campaign, the Northern France and the
Rhineland Campaign.

10.  Department of the Army Technical Manual TM 12-235 (Discharge
Procedures and Preparation of Separation Forms) established the policies
and procedures for completion and distribution of the WD AGO Form 53-55
during World War II.  This regulation stated that the last unit, or similar
element, to which an individual was assigned, rather than the element of
which he was a part while moving to a separation activity, would be entered
in item 6 (Organization) of the WD AGO Form 53-55.  The regulation also
noted that assignment to units for the purpose of transfer from a theater
to the United States was considered part of the movement to a separation
activity.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was assigned to Battery D,
136th Antiaircraft Artillery Gun Battalion prior to his discharge.

2.  The applicant's Honorable Discharge Certificate shows he was a member
of Battery D, 136th Antiaircraft Artillery Gun Battalion in the European-
African-Middle Eastern Theater of Operations prior to being assigned to the
Separation Center at Fort Dix, New Jersey.

3.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 shows campaign credit awarded to
the 386th Antiaircraft Artillery Automatic Weapons Battalion during World
War II.  Four of the five campaigns for this unit listed in this pamphlet
are shown in item 32 (Battles and Campaigns) on the applicant's WD AGO Form
53-55.  Only two of the campaigns for the 136th Antiaircraft Artillery Gun
Battalion listed in this pamphlet are shown in item 32 on the applicant's
WD AGO Form 53-55.
4.  Based on the evidence available, it appears that the applicant's last
unit of assignment was the 386th Antiaircraft Artillery Automatic Weapons
Battalion while he was assigned to the European-African-Middle Eastern
Theater of Operations.  It appears that most likely the applicant was
assigned to the 136th Antiaircraft Artillery Gun Battalion only for
movement to the separation activity at Fort Dix, New Jersey.

5.  In accordance with the governing regulation then in effect, the
applicant's last unit, the 386th Antiaircraft Artillery Automatic Weapons
Battalion, to which he was assigned while not moving to a separation
activity, should have been entered in item 6 on his WD AGO Form 53-55.

6.  It appears that an error has occurred in this case.  Therefore, it
would be appropriate to amend his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show the entry
"386th Antiaircraft Artillery Automatic Weapons Battalion" in item 6.

BOARD VOTE:

SC______  LE______  LB______  GRANT RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected:

      a.  by deleting the entry "Btry D 136th AAA Gun Bn" from item 6 on his
WD AGO Form 53-55; and


      b.  by adding the entry "386th Antiaircraft Artillery Automatic
Weapons Battalion" to item 6 on his WD AGO Form 53-55.




            Samuel Crumpler_______
                    CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004100392                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20040629                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |100.0000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |