RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 15 September 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040011525
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. David S. Griffin | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. John N. Slone | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Eric N. Andersen | |Member |
| |Ms. Carol A. Kornhoff | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 4 June
1980 be corrected to show 2 years and 24 days of net active service.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that Item 12c (Net Active Service This
Period) on his DD Form 214 is incorrect.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on
4 June 1980, the date of his discharge. The application submitted in this
case is dated 13 December 2004.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant's military records show he enlisted on 28 June 1978 for a
period of 4 years. He successfully completed basic combat and advanced
individual training and was awarded the military occupational specialty
15D10 (lance missile crewman). The highest grade the applicant held was
private/pay
grade E-2.
4. On 4 June 1980, the applicant was discharged under the Expeditious
Discharge Program for failure to maintain acceptable standards for
retention. He had completed 1 year, 11 months and 7 days of active service
that was characterized as under honorable conditions.
5. Item 12a (Date Entered AD (active duty) This Period) of the applicant's
DD Form 214 contained the entry 78 06 28 (1978 June 28).
6. Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) of the applicant's DD Form 214
contained the entry 80 06 04 (1980 June 4).
7. Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of the applicant's DD Form
214 contained the entry 00 01 07 (zero years, 1 month and 7 days).
8. Item 21 (Time Lost) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel
Qualification Record) did not show any periods of lost time.
9. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) established the
standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. The
regulation provides, in pertinent part, that the beginning date of the
continuous period of active duty (AD) for which the DD Form 214 is being
issued, be entered in item 12a of the DD Form 214. This regulation also
provides that the date of separation be entered in item 12b and that the
net service for the period shown is computed by subtracting item 12a from
item 12b and then deducting any lost time and non-creditable service after
date of discharge.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that the net service currently shown in Item 12c
of his DD Form 214 should be 2 years and 24 days.
2. The records do not contain any entries showing any lost time.
Therefore, all time computed is day for day service without adjustments for
lost time.
3. Computation of the applicant's net service in accordance with Army
Regulation 635-5 shows that his net service is 1 year, 11 months and 7
days. Therefore, the entry in Item 12c of the applicant's DD Form 214
should
read 01 11 07.
4. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error now
under consideration on 4 June 1980, the date of discharge; therefore, the
time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on
3 June 1983. The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of
limitations. However, the compelling evidence shows that it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
___cak__ ____jns__ ____ena_ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely
file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army
records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Item 12c of
the applicant's DD Form 214 to read 01 11 07 instead of 00 01 07.
2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
net active service in excess of 1 year, 11 months and 7 days.
__________John N. Slone_______
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20040011525 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON |YYYYMMDD |
|DATE BOARDED |20050915 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |YYYYMMDD |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR . . . . . |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |PARTIAL GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. | |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001576
The applicant requests a DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for his period of service from 27 April 1976 through 27 January 1980. The applicant provides: * NA Form 13038 * DD Form 214 with an effective date of 26 April 1976 * DD Form 214 with a separation date of 27 January 1983 * his discharge and reenlistment orders, dated 15 April 1976 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As such, his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 27 January 1983 should show in: * item 12a - 27 April...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005497
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicantÂ’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The regulation provided, in pertinent part, that the beginning date of the continuous period of AD for which the DD Form 214 is being issued be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013165
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013165 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Item 12a of the DD Form 214 that he was furnished at the time of his discharge shows his date entered on active duty this period as 29 June 1980 and item 12b shows his separation date this period as 7 May 1989. ____________x___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008654
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002017
The applicant's records show that she enlisted in the RA for the second time on 2 January 2003. Therefore, item 12a of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 August 2005 should be corrected to show this date. Therefore, item 12c of her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show 2 years and 7 months.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003817C070206
The applicant provided documents which confirm his record of service and military service dates; however, this evidence does not support a change to Item 12a. The evidence of record shows that the applicant's discharge date from active duty was 23 January 1985. Therefore, Item 12c of the applicant's DD Form 214 is correct.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020796
Her DD Form 214 shows in: * item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty this Period) the entry "2009 01 16" * item 12b (Separation Date This Period) the entry "2010 01 17" * item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) the entry "0001 00 02" 8. Although her personnel and DFAS records are inconsistent as to the date she began her service in 2009, the preponderance of evidence suggests she began her tour of duty on 16 February 2009; therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 12a of her DD Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016736
However, there is no evidence in his records that show he was awarded MOS 25F or that he was issued a DD Form 214 for this period of service. He then completed 6 months and 10 days when he was ordered to active duty on 1 August 2006 (the DD Form 215 adjusted this date to 28 July 2006) and he was released from active duty on 7 February 2007. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012057
The applicant requests correction of item 12a (Dated Entered Active Duty This Period) and item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 19 August 1996. The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 August 1996; U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders, dated 12 February 1990; DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), dated 4 January 1990; and a DA Form 1695 (Oath of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004432
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending on 14 August 2007 to show in item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) the entry "2006 07 06" vice "2007 01 02." His record contains a memorandum, issued by Fort Benning, GA, on 10 October 2009, requesting HRC issue the applicant a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...