RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 22 September 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040011523
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Ms. Rosa M. Chandler | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. James E. Anderholm | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Bernard P. Ingold | |Member |
| |Mr. Michael J. Flynn | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show he was
awarded the Purple Heart (PH).
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he believes his official military
personnel file (OMPF) is complete and that it will include medical records
that will show he received medical care for a piece of shrapnel that was
lodged between his eyes. He also states that he has a Department of
Veterans Affairs (DVA) Rating Decision which shows he has a 0 percent
rating for a service-connected disability for that injury. He has a
pending claim for an increased rating. He also believes the documents that
he has provided in conjunction with his OMPF will support award of the PH
for this injury.
3. A letter written by the applicant in his own behalf, dated 15 November
2004, states that he served in Vietnam from 15 November 1967 to 15 November
1968 as an infantry paratrooper assigned to Company D, 2nd Battalion, 503rd
Infantry, 173rd Airborne Brigade and the organizations main mission was to
search and destroy. Therefore, he participated in over 50 combat assaults.
It was during a search and destroy mission outside of the fire support
base at LZ English, Bong Song, Vietnam that he was injured. He has
provided an eyewitness statement that was written by an individual that was
with him at the time of the injury. The eyewitness summoned medical
personnel, and he was treated and evacuated to a field infirmary. The
applicant also provides details concerning several other Vietnam
experiences, information about his personal history since he returned from
Vietnam and information about his current medical condition.
4. The applicant provides in support of his request:
a. DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer
or Discharge).
b. A letter written by the applicant in his own behalf, dated 15
November 2004.
c. An eyewitness statement, undated.
d. A DVA Transmittal Record.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. On 22 May 1967, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years
and training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons
Infantryman). He completed the training requirements, was awarded the MOS
and on 16 November 1967, he was assigned to Vietnam with duties in his MOS.
Initially, he was assigned to Company A, 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry,
173rd Airborne Brigade. On 1 July 1968, he was further assigned to Company
D, 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry, 173rd Airborne Brigade and he served with
this unit until he left Vietnam and returned to Fort Hood, Texas.
2. The eyewitness indicates that both he and the applicant arrived in
Vietnam on 16 November 1967 and they were both assigned to the same
platoon. In March 1968, their unit left the central highlands at LZ
English, Bong Song, Vietnam, and moved into the coastal region around Bong
Song in support of Operation Cochise. While performing a search and
destroy mission the unit engaged in fire with an enemy force. A grenade
exploded near the applicant and shrapnel hit him, and became lodged in the
bridge of his nose. He called for medical personnel; the applicant was
extracted from the battlefield, treated and returned to the battlefield
with a bandage on his nose.
3. On 21 May 1970, the applicant was honorably separated from active duty.
His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal,
Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, Vietnam Campaign
Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, Parachutist Badge, Expert Marksmanship
Qualification Badge (Rifle M-14) and the Marksman Marksmanship
Qualification Badge (Rifle M-16). It does not show the PH as an authorized
award.
4 The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty List, a
compilation of all casualties during the Vietnam War.
5. The available record did not contain any medical records.
6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) sets forth Department of the
Army criteria, policy and instructions concerning individual military
awards, the service medals and service ribbons, combat and special skill
badges and tabs, unit decorations, and trophies and similar devices awarded
in recognition of accomplishments. It provides, in pertinent part, that
the: PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.
Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that: (1) the wound was
the result of hostile action; (2) the wound required medical treatment; and
(3) the medical treatment was made a matter of official record. This
regulation also provides that there is no statute of limitations on
requests for award of the PH.
7. Army Regulation 670-1, in effect at the time, governs the requirements
for the Oversea Service Bar (OSB). In pertinent part, it provides that a
bar is authorized for wear for each period of active Federal service as a
member of the U.S. Army outside of the continental limits of the United
States. There are special provisions regarding authorization for the OSB
for service in a hostile fire zone and for combining service to calculate
award of the bars. For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar is
authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member
of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to
28 March 1973. Both the month of arrival and the month of departure from
Vietnam are counted as a whole months for credit toward the overseas
service bar. The applicant is authorized award of two OSB's for his
service from
16 November 1967 to 15 November 1968.
8. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign
Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units
serving in Vietnam. This document shows the unit to which the applicant
was assigned was cited for award of the Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit
Citation with Palm for the period 5 May 1965 to 26 September 1970 by
Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 51, dated 1971.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. To be awarded the PH, the applicant would have to show that he was
wounded and that: (1) the wound was the result of hostile action; (2) the
wound required medical treatment; and (3) the medical treatment was made a
matter of official record.
2. No medical records were available, therefore, none were considered and
the applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty List.
3. The applicant's eyewitness statement alone is inadequate to establish a
basis for award of the PH. The statement alone is not sufficient evidence
to show the injury was the result of hostile fire. Neither is the
statement sufficient to show the applicant was treated and the treatment
was made a matter of record.
4. Both the applicant's statement and the eyewitness statement merely
relate a telling of events and do not provide proof that the applicant was
actually wounded in action while serving in Vietnam.
5. However, the applicant is authorized award of the Vietnam Gallantry
Cross Unit Citation with Palm and two OSB's.
6. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative
error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore,
administrative correction of the applicant’s records will be accomplished
by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as
outlined by the Board in paragraph 2 of the BOARD
DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__jea___ __bpi___ __mjf___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.
2. The Board determined that administrative error in the records of the
individual should be corrected. Therefore, the Board requests that the
CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual
concerned to show award of the Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with
Palm and two OSB's.
James E. Anderholm
______________________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20040011523 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20050922 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |(GRANT) |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |107.0015 |
|2. |107.0094 |
|3. |107.0079 |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001636C070206
The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart (PH) and that he be provided a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) showing the award. In pertinent part, it provides that a bar is authorized for wear for each period of active Federal service as a member of the U.S. Army outside of the continental limits of the United States. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001636C070206
The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart (PH) and that he be provided a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) showing the award. His truck was following an armored personnel carrier (APC). Evidence shows that the applicants records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024270
General Orders Number 189, issued by Headquarters, 85th Evacuation Hospital, on 10 December 1967 awarded him the Purple Heart (1st Award) for wounds received in action in Vietnam on 7 December 1967. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicants military service records showing he was wounded on any date other than 7 December 1967. No other dates or wounds are listed.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013510
He goes on to state he contacted the Military Awards Branch and was made aware that no record of his submission for the Purple Heart was recorded and he would like to correct this oversight. For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar was authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014023
The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart. There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel records awarding him the Purple Heart. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the Purple Heart, there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of or was caused by enemy action, that the wound was treated by medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030534
Therefore, he should be awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the VSM; b. awarding him the AGCM (First Award) for the period 29 August 1966 through 28 August 1969;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009156
The applicant provides the following documents in support of his request for reconsideration: a. letter from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records Board, dated 10 September 2008; b. letter from the National Archives and Records Administration, dated 9 October 2008; c. DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer); and d. Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Decision Review Officer Decision, dated 14 April 2009. The applicant has provided new evidence, which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076689C070215
Paragraph 2-15b provides that requests for reconsideration, which are received more than 1 year after the Board’s original consideration or after the Board has already reconsidered the case will be considered only if the staff of the Board determines that substantial relevant new evidence shows fraud, mistake of law, mathematical miscalculation, manifest error, or that there is substantial relevant new evidence discovered contemporaneously with or within a short time after the Board’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010189
The applicant states: * He served in Vietnam as infantryman from August 1969 to June 1970; he was assigned as a platoon sergeant to A Company, 3rd Battalion, 503rd Infantry, 173rd Airborne Brigade * Between August and October 1969, he was wounded; his unit received small arms fire during a patrol; he dropped to the ground near a rock when a bullet hit the rock next to his hand and fragments injured his hand * After the shooting stopped, a medic examined his wound and gave him a topical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090112C070212
The certificate indicates that the award of the Purple Heart is made for wounds received in action on 27 December 1967 in the Republic of Vietnam. This document also shows that the unit the applicant served with in Vietnam, Company A, 4th Battalion, 503rd Infantry, 101st Airborne Division, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, with Palm, Unit Citation, for the period 5 May 1965 through 26 September 1970, by DAGO 51, dated 1971; and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor...