Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011499C070208
Original file (20040011499C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            16 August 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR20040011499


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Melvin H. Meyer               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. John T. Meixell               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. James B. Gunlicks             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the reason for his discharge be
changed to one that would allow him to retain his bonus.

2.  The applicant states his unit was inactivated and he was given a
general discharge from the Army National Guard (ARNG) because, as a 31U, he
could not drill within 50 miles of his home.  His bonus was recouped.  He
believes that to be unjust because it was due to his unit's inactivation.

3.  The applicant provides unit inactivation orders and a letter from the
Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) dated13 August 2004.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 July 1996.  He
completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded
military occupational specialty 31U (Signal Support Systems Specialist).

2.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 14 July 2000
and transferred to the ARNG, for which he had signed an enlistment contract
for a     3-year commitment. Although the available enlistment documents do
not indicate he received an enlistment bonus, his Personnel Qualification
Record – Enlisted indicates he did. He was assigned to Headquarters and
Headquarters Company, 1st Brigade, 40th Infantry Division, Long Beach, CA.

3.  On 10 February 2003, the applicant sent a statement to his commander.
He stated his joining the ARNG was not well thought out.  He requested
transfer to the Inactive (sic) Ready Reserve.  He would "go if America
needed him" but until that time he wished to remain unassociated [with the
ARNG].  Around April 2003, he made a sworn statement wherein he stated the
main reason for his decision [to leave the ARNG] was continuous conflict
with his civilian job.

4.  On 5 April 2003, the applicant signed a California ARNG Form 600-2R
(Request for Discharge of Enlisted Members).  The form indicated the reason
for discharge as continuous conflict with his civilian job.  It also
indicated the recommended characterization of his service was under
honorable conditions.  However, his NGB Form 22E (Report of Separation and
Record of Service) shows he was discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve
of the Army on        6 April 2003 with a fully honorable characterization
of service.  The reason for discharge was given as employment conflict.

5.  The applicant provided State of California, Office of The Adjutant
General Permanent Order Number 100-001 dated 8 April 2004 which indicated
Headquarters, 1st Brigade, 40th Infantry Division was
inactivated/consolidated with Headquarters, 640th Military Intelligence
Battalion, 40th Infantry Division effective 1 September 2003.

6.  By letter dated 13 August 2004, DFAS informed the applicant their
records indicated his bonus contract was terminated for miscellaneous
reasons prior to the fulfillment of his period of obligated service and his
debt in the principle amount of $647.66 remained valid.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It cannot be determined what type of bonus the applicant received when
he enlisted in the ARNG.  It appears retention of the bonus required him to
complete his 3-year period of obligated service.

2.  The applicant did not complete his 3-year enlistment in the ARNG and
the evidence of record indicates it was for personal reasons and not
because his unit had inactivated.

3.  The available evidence of record shows the applicant was indicating as
early as February 2003, 7 months prior to the date his unit inactivated,
that he no longer wished to serve with the ARNG.  In April 2003, he
indicated his civilian employment conflicted with his ARNG obligations.  He
was honorably discharged (a general under honorable conditions discharge
had only been recommended) on 6 April 2003, 4 months prior to his unit's
inactivation.

4.  There is insufficient evidence on which to base granting the requested
relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__mhm___  __jtm___  __jbg__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




            ___Melvin H. Meyer____
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040011499                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050816                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |110.02                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002235

    Original file (20120002235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he signed an agreement to serve in the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG) for 6 years in exchange for a $10,000.00 OAB * he transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) because his original unit, the 38th Support Battalion, closed * his higher headquarters decided to slot him in a position but then placed a major (MAJ)/O-4 in the same position * his assigned unit closed/reorganized and there was no slots in his State for his area of concentration (AOC) without being...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011927

    Original file (20090011927.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * Internet information on award of the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation to the 40th Infantry Division * DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards), dated 23 January 1995 * Letter, dated 31 August 2009, from the Army Review Boards Agency, Support Division, St. Louis, MO * Orders for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award), dated 31 August 2009 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000126C070205

    Original file (20060000126C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E which shows, in pertinent part, the applicant's eligibility for a reenlistment bonus, that the terms of the applicant's reenlistment were acknowledged, and that he would receive a total bonus of $2,000. This document shows, in pertinent, that the applicant was qualified to serve in the duty position, that he remained entitled to his SRIP reenlistment bonus, and that the authority for the transfer was NGR 600-200,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003706

    Original file (20140003706.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He acknowledged, in pertinent part: a. he was enlisting in an MTOE unit in a valid, vacant position; b. he was MOS qualified for the position as of the date of his reenlistment; c. the REB was to be paid in one lump-sum payment to be processed on the date of his reenlistment or extension took effect; d. if, due to unit transformation/reorganization, he became non-duty MOS qualified before his current expiration of term of service, the bonus payment would not be processed until he became duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002139

    Original file (20130002139.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * the military overpaid his student loans in 2008 – he was not aware that an overpayment had occurred since the payments were made directly to the Department of Education while he was deployed to Iraq * he was entitled to $9,000.00 in student loan repayment benefits; however, payments totaling $14,400.00 were applied toward his loans * after redeployment from Iraq, he was released from active duty in Virginia, not California, and his Virginia address is reflected on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015880

    Original file (20060015880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory opinion further indicates that regarding cases when Soldiers are separated for an unfulfilled contract or in doubtful cases, commanders have the option to request a waiver of recoupment provisions. Memoranda provided by the applicant's chain of command and career counselor both concur that the Department of the Army breached the terms of the applicant's reenlistment contract; therefore, the applicant is not obligated to repay the reenlistment bonus. Considering there is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013773

    Original file (20070013773.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests he be paid the full amount of his prior service enlistment bonus (PSEB) of $5,000.00 and student loan repayment program (SLRP) incentive of $10,000.00 for his enlistment in the United States Army Reserve (USAR). Evidence of record shows that on 28 June 2002 the applicant enlisted in the USAR for a 6-year term of service for a $5,000.00 PSEB and a $10,000.00 SLRP incentive. Notwithstanding the fact the advisory opinion recommended the applicant be paid the full...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004866

    Original file (20130004866.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He further recommended a memorandum be placed in his official military personnel file (currently known as the Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR)) stating he was entitled to receive the Officer Affiliation Bonus at the time of his accepting a commission into the CAARNG. The opinion stated the following: * the applicant accepted a commission in the CAARNG on 15 August 2007 * the CAARNG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072640C070403

    Original file (2002072640C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the applicant’s request, the National Personnel Records Center had issued to him on 2 April 2002, all of the awards to which he was determined to be entitled, which included the Good Conduct Medal and the National Defense Service Medal, in addition to the awards previously mentioned. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was wounded in action in Korea on 22 April 1951, and is entitled to the Purple Heart for that wound. Once the Department of the Air Force has authorized the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016817

    Original file (20140016817.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a waiver of recoupment of his Officer Affiliation Bonus (OAB) which he received as a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) officer. The applicant provides: * Written Agreement – Officer Affiliation Bonus Acknowledgment * USAR Pamphlet 600-5 * DA Form 4651 * Transfer to the Retired Reserve orders CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In order to be eligible for the SELRES Officer Affiliation Bonus an officer must meet Department of the Army eligibility criteria published in All Army...