RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 13 September 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040011061
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Ms. Shirley L. Powell | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Robert L. Duecaster | |Member |
| |MS. Jeanette R. McCants | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, allocation of a higher Overseas
Housing Allowance (OHA) and Cost of Living Allowance (COLA).
2. The applicant states, in effect, he should be authorized OHA and COLA
at the “Munster Hessen (H)” rate, effective the date of his arrival in the
area. His basis the higher COLA rate is the lack of community services in
the area.
3. The applicant provides an Individual OHA Report (DA Form 2367) and a
house lease, dated 1 September 2003 in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant’s record shows he is currently serving on active duty in
Europe, in the rank of major.
2. In connection with the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was
obtained from the Chief, Compensation & Entitlements Division, Office of
the Deputy Chief of Staff G-1, The Pentagon, Washington DC. This Army
official, after carefully reviewing the facts surrounding the applicant’s
situation, supports authorizing the applicant OHA at the “Muenster Hessen
(H)” rate from the date of his lease (1 September 2003) through 15 December
2003.
3. The G-1 Chief, Compensations & Entitlements Branch further indicates
that when the applicant arrived in “Munster NRW” on 28 June 2003, there was
no specific rate for the “Munster NRW” area, and the authorized rate was
based on the “Other NRW” rate. However, the applicant’s servicing finance
office established his OHA at the “Muster Hessen (H)” rate, which was
higher than the “Other NWR” rate. Since the applicant was paid the higher
rate, which he believed to be correct, he based his lease on that higher
rate. As a result, he was placed in a financial bind through no fault of
his own when the error was corrected.
4. The G-1 official also indicated the Per Diem committed established a
specific COLA and OHA rate for “Muenster NRW” on 16 December 2003, which
coincides with the higher “Munster Hessen (H) rate”. However, the Per Diem
committee cannot establish rates retroactively, and no authorization is
available at the higher “Muenster Hessen (H)” rate for OHA for the period
between the date of the applicant’s lease, 1 September 2003 through the
date of the rate change, 16 December 2003. The applicant was provided a
copy of the G-1 advisory opinion and concurred with its contents on 16
March 2005.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was authorized to receive
OHA at a higher rate than originally authorized due to an administrative
error on the part of his local finance officer. Further, the evidence
confirms the higher rate was ultimately authorized for the applicant’s area
by the Per Diem committee on 16 December 2003.
2. The G-1 advisory opinion confirms the applicant received the proper
COLA rate from the date of his arrival. Therefore, it would not be
appropriate to authorize a higher COLA rate in this case.
3. In view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate to correct
the applicant’s record to show he was authorized the higher OHA rate he is
now authorized since the date of his lease, 1 September 2003. Further, it
would be appropriate to reimburse the applicant for any OHA overpayment
already collected.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
___SLP__ __RLD__ __JRM__ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board
recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual
concerned be corrected by showing he was authorized the higher OHA rate he
now receives since the date he entered into his lease on 1 September 2003;
and by reimbursing him any OHA overpayment that may have already been
collected.
2. The Board determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant
a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends
denial of so much of the application that pertains to payment of a higher
rate of COLA.
____Shirley L. Powell_____
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20040011061 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |2005/09/13 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |N/A |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |N/A |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |N/A |
|DISCHARGE REASON |N/A |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |Mr. Schneider |
|ISSUES 1. |128.1200 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011033C070208
Therefore, it would not be appropriate to authorize a higher COLA rate in this case. In view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record to show he was authorized the higher OHA rate he is now authorized since the date of his lease, 1 November 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was authorized the higher OHA rate he now receives since the date he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011064C070208
Therefore, it would not be appropriate to authorize a higher COLA rate in this case. In view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record to show he was authorized the higher OHA rate he is now authorized since the date of his lease, 8 September 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was authorized the higher OHA rate he now receives since the date he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011046C070208
Therefore, it would not be appropriate to authorize a higher COLA rate in this case. In view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record to show he was authorized the higher OHA rate he is now authorized since the date of his lease, 15 August 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was authorized the higher OHA rate he now receives since the date he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011065C070208
Therefore, it would not be appropriate to authorize a higher COLA rate in this case. In view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record to show he was authorized the higher OHA rate he is now authorized since the date of his lease, 1 February 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was authorized the higher OHA rate he now receives since the date he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011062C070208
Evidence of record shows that the applicant arrived in "Muenster NRW" on 7 August 2002 and entered into a lease on 1 September 2002. The "Muenster H" OHA rate was higher than the "other NRW" OHA rate. However, as the advisory opinion states, the per diem committee cannot establish rates retroactively and no authorization is available at the higher "Muenster H" rate for OHA during the period of the applicant's lease.
Therefore, based on his most recent information, the applicant signed a housing lease on 1 April 1997 at the $2500 rate believing this was the correct rate. After he signed the lease, the applicant was informed there was a change to the JFTR and his OHA rate would be $2300. LEROY k5xwd-9 T. BASEMAN Panel Chair 4 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AF'BCMR 97-01 692 AUG 1 4 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AUG 2 8 1998 AFBCMR 98-01227 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF 'I Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that on 20 N Overseas Housing...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01396 AUG 2 4 S98 L A MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen rtment of the Air Force relating to be corrected...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98- 01353 . Attachment: Ltr, HQ USAF/DPRC, dtd 27 May 1 9 9 8 , w/Atch DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 27 May 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: HQ USAF/DPRC SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Record 1040 Air Force Pentagon Washington DC 20330-1 040 "-r This responds to a request fofi a BCMR advisory on-ho records be changed to show he was due...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01763 AUG 2 5 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured the compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinen Force relating to show that on 20 N Overseas Housing Allowance...