SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            DECEMBER 16, 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR20040010731


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.  A quorum was present during the
further consideration and deliberation.  The findings appearing in
proceedings dated December 16, 2004 were affirmed.  The following
additional findings, conclusions, and recommendations were adopted by the
Board.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Luis Almodova                 |     |Analyst              |

      The Board convened at the call of the Director on the above date to
reconsider the conclusions and recommendation appearing in proceedings
dated December 16, 2004.

|     |Ms. Yolanda Maldonado             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Maribeth B. Love              |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Ronald J. Weaver              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following additional evidence:

      Exhibit C – (show the identifying data for the original Record of
Proceedings)






CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE:

5.  On 4 November 2004, new information was received from the Army Review
Boards Agency Support Division, St. Louis, Missouri, in regard to the
decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in
Docket Number AR2003093283, dated 26 February 2004.

6.  The evidence submitted consists of a copy of the DA Form 4836, Oath of
Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment, pertinent to the extension entered
into by the applicant on 6 January 2002.

ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

5.  At the time of the decision of the ABCMR in Docket Number AR2003093283,
dated 26 February 2004, it was the intent of the ABCMR to make the
applicant’s record as administratively correct as it should properly have
been at the time.

6.  The ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR2003093283 is incorrect
due to an administrative error that affected the results of the Board's
final determination/recommendation in the case.

7.  In paragraph 2, of the Consideration of Evidence, it states that the
applicant extended her enlistment for a period of 5 months and 1 day and,
that the applicant's new ETS (expiration term of service) should have been
established to be 26 July 2002.

8.  Paragraph 2, of the Consideration of Evidence, should correctly state
that the applicant extended her enlistment for a period of 1 year and 5
months and, the applicant's new ETS should have been established to be 25
July 2003.

9.  In paragraph 2, of the Discussion and Conclusions, it states that the
applicant originally enlisted in the USAR (US Army Reserve) on 26 February
for 8 years.  The year, 1994, was inadvertently omitted from this sentence
and it should be included to form a basis for other dates pertinent to the
applicant's service.

10.  The year, 1994, should be included in the first sentence of Paragraph
2, of the Discussion and Conclusions, and should read as follows:  The
applicant originally enlisted in the USAR on 26 February 1994 for 8 years.

11.  In paragraph 3, of the Discussion and Conclusions, it states, "With an
extension of her service agreement for 5 months and 1 day, the applicant's
new ETS (Item 8c.) should have been established at 26 July 2002, and not 31
June 2003.  It should be noted that the month of June has only 30 days."

12.  Paragraph 3, of the Discussion and Conclusions, should correctly read,
"With an extension of her service agreement for 1 year and 5 months, the
applicant's new ETS (Item 8c.) should have been established at 25 July
2003, and not 31 June 2003.  It should be noted that the month of June has
only 30 days.”

13.  In paragraph c, in the Board Determination/Recommendation, the
recommendation is to amend "the date in item 8c to read:  20020725 (25 July
2002)."  This date was incorrectly established based on the administrative
error incorrectly interpreting the period of the applicant's extension.

14.  Paragraph c, in the Board Determination/Recommendation, should be
amended to read, "amending the date in item 8c to read:  20030725 (25 July
2003).

BOARD VOTE:

YM_____  RJW ____  MBL_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
amendment of the decision of the Army Board for Correction of Military
Records set forth in Docket Number AR2003093283, dated 26 February 2004, to
show

      e.  in paragraph 2, of the Consideration of Evidence, that the
applicant extended her enlistment for a period of 1 year and 5 months and,
the applicant's new ETS should have been established to be 25 July 2003.

      f.  in paragraph 2, of the Discussion and Conclusions, that the
applicant originally enlisted in the USAR (US Army Reserve) on 26 February
1994 for 8 years.

      g.  in paragraph 3, of the Discussion and Conclusions, that, "With an
extension of her service agreement for 1 year and 5 months, the applicant's
new ETS (Item 8c.) should have been established at 25 July 2003, and not 31
June 2003.

      h.  in paragraph c, in the Board Determination/Recommendation, that
the date in item 8c is amended to read:  20030725 (25 July 2003).





            ____Yolanda Maldonado____
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040010731                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20041216                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.  189  |110.0000                                |
|2.  190                 |110.0100                                |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |

-----------------------
[pic]