Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009893C070208
Original file (20040009893C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           2 August 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040009893


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. William D. Powers             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Robert Duecaster              |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Jeannette R. McCants          |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his retired pay be computed using the final
pay calculation.

2.  The applicant states that his retired pay was erroneously computed
using the High-3 rule.  He entered the U. S. Military Academy on 6 July
1977 even though he did not graduate until 1981.

3.  The applicant provides a newspaper article; a 14 January 2002 letter to
the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS); a DFAS retired pay
calculation dated 25 July 2001; two undated letters from DFAS to him; a 24
June 2003 letter from him to DFAS (plus the same letter, only undated); a
17 October 2004 email to the Fort McCoy, WI Retirement Services Officer and
a response dated 19 October 2004; an 11 October 2004 letter to the U. S.
Total Army Personnel Command; a copy of a certified mail certificate dated
6 August 2003; and an undated note to DFAS.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on    1 July 2001.  The application submitted in this case is
dated 2 November 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant's U. S. Military Academy contract is not available.  He
was commissioned out of the Academy on 27 May 1981.  He retired on 1 July
2001.

4.  A Summary of Retired Pay Account prepared on 25 July 2001 indicated the
applicant had entered the military after 7 September 1980 and therefore his
retired pay would be computed using his monthly base pay (the average of
the 36 highest monthly basic pay rates he received on active duty) instead
of his last active duty basic pay.

5.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1406 states that the retired pay base of
any person entitled to retired pay under section 3911 (retirement of a
commissioned officer for length of service) who first became a member of a
uniformed service before 8 September 1980 is computed based upon the
monthly basic pay of the member's retired grade.

6.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1407(a) states that the retired pay of
any person entitled to that pay who first became a member of a uniformed
service after         7 September 1980 is computed using the retired pay
base determined under this section.  Subsection 1407(b) states that, except
as provided for in subsection 1407(f) (pertaining to certain enlisted
members), the retired pay base of a person under this section is the
person's high-three average determined under subsection (c) (Regular
service) or (d) (non-Regular service) (also known as High-3).

7.  Title 10, U. S. Code, subsection 1407(c) states that the general rule
is the high-three average of a member entitled to retired pay under any
provision of law other than sections 1204 (members on active duty for 30
days or less or on inactive-duty training: retirement), 1206 (members on
active duty for 30 day or less or on inactive-duty training: separation),
or 12731 (non-Regular retirement) of this title is the amount equal to:

     (A) the total amount of monthly basic pay to which the member was
entitled for the 36 months (whether or not consecutive) out of all the
months of active service of the member for which the monthly basic pay to
which the member was entitled was the highest, divided by

     (B)  36.

8.  The U. S. Army Human Resources Command Military Personnel Message
Number 03-103, Subject:  DIEMS (date initially entered military service)
Date Accuracy, stated that the DIEMS is the date an individual was
initially enlisted, inducted, or appointed in a Regular or Reserve
Component of a uniformed service as a commissioned officer, warrant
officer, or enlisted member.  The DIEMS date for a West Point cadet is the
date of entry into the Academy.  This date is used solely to indicate which
retirement plan a member is under.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's U. S. Military Academy contract is not available;
however, as he was appointed a commissioned officer on 27 May 1981 after
graduating from the Academy it stands to reason that he entered the Academy
sometime in 1977.

2.  The applicant states he entered the Academy on 6 July 1977.  The Board
accepts that date as the date he entered the Academy.  Therefore, his
records should be corrected to show his DIEMS as 6 July 1977 and his
retired pay should be computed based upon the monthly basic pay of his
retired grade and not on his High-3.

BOARD VOTE:

__wdp___  __rd____  __jrm___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by showing his DIEMS as 6 July 1977,
recomputing his retired pay accordingly, and paying to him any and all back
due retired pay.




            __William D. Powers___
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040009893                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050802                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |128.14                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010315C070208

    Original file (20040010315C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant enlisted in the USMCR on 13 January 1978. The applicant's 9 months of service in the USMCR DEP was creditable for pay (he had been honorably discharged; his service had not been voided) and should have been creditable for pay for the years he served in the Army in addition to determining his retired pay.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010142

    Original file (20110010142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that his Date of Initial Entry to Military Service (DIEMS) is 7 July 1975. The applicant states that his DIEMS was incorrectly posted on his records as the date he was commissioned from the United States Military Academy instead of the date he entered the academy and the error is affecting the disability portion of his retired pay. A review of his records shows that the applicant’s DIEMS date was recorded as 6 June 1979, the date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006020C070206

    Original file (20050006020C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    As new issues, he requests (1) reinstatement on active duty in the Active Guard Reserve (AGR), promotion to Colonel, and credit for active duty service and active duty pay since his forced retirement effective 31 March 2003; and (2) that he be paid his personal costs, in the estimated amount of about $1,000, due to his retirement permanent change of station (PCS). He was released from active duty effective 31 March 2003 upon completing about 20 years of active Federal service and placed in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010563

    Original file (20100010563.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show his final Date Initially Entered Military Service (DIEMS) as 10 September 1979; that his retirement pay plan be changed from High-3 to Final Pay based on his DIEMS; and that he be provided all back retirement pay due as a result of this correction. A copy of a DD Form 4, dated 10 September 1979, shows the applicant entered into an ROTC scholarship contract, was appointed a scholarship cadet, and enlisted in the U.S....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015319

    Original file (20060015319.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his DIEMS date is incorrect because it is the date he was commissioned from the University of Alabama and not the date he entered the University of Alabama Army Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) program under contract with a four year Army ROTC scholarship. On 2 May 2007, the applicant requested a 60 day extension to gather additional evidence in support of his rebuttal to the advisory opinion. The DIEMS date for a ROTC cadet is the date they...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024836

    Original file (20110024836.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that his Date of Initial Entry to Military Service (DIEMS) is 24 September 1973. While it cannot be determined by reviewing the available records what date is recorded as the applicant’s DIEMS date, his records should be corrected as appropriate to show that his correct DIEMS date is 24 September 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004993

    Original file (20090004993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) Letter, dated 17 August 2007; College Transcripts, dated 12 May 1984; Retirement Memorandum, dated 13 August 2005; DD Form 93 (Record of Emergency Date); SGLV Form 8286 (Service Member’s Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate); DD Form 1299 (Application for Shipment and/or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056295C070420

    Original file (2001056295C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : That information from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service – Cleveland Center (DFAS-CL) dated 7 January 1999 stated that his retired basic pay would be based on his highest 36 months of pay. However, in April 2001 he received an Information Paper from his local retirement services officer (RSO) stating that his retired pay would be based on an average of his highest 36 months of basic enlisted pay only since he had less than 10 years of commissioned service. Title...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085535C070212

    Original file (2003085535C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She further contends that in order to correct her retired pay, DFAS requires a corrected "Statement of Service" with her correct DIEMS date of 6 September 1977. The new law provided for the computation of retired pay as a percentage of a member’s retired pay base. That DFAS correct the applicant’s service entry date to show she entered a Uniformed Service on 6 September 1977.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017978

    Original file (20130017978.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * both the Military Retirement Pay Coordinator at Fort Knox, KY and the Ohio Army National Guard (OHARNG) Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Finance Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) calculated his retirement pay at $3907.00 monthly; however, he is only receiving $3315.00 * his retired pay calculation should be based on pay averaging $6148.23 monthly, not the current based average of $5184.90 * he held the rank/grade of SGM/E-9 for 35 months, from 1 February 2010 to 17 January...