Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009797C070208
Original file (20040009797C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:          23 August 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040009797


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr.             |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Kathleen A. Newman            |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. William D. Powers             |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Marla J. N. Troup             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded.

2.  The applicant states he is now in a position to get on with his life in
a positive direction and his is requesting an upgrade for future
considerations.

3.  The applicant provides an additional statement to the effect the real
reason he was separated is not shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of
Discharge from Active Duty).  The issue was brought up months after the
punishment from the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) imposed under Article 15,
Uniform Code of Military Justice.  He volunteered to leave after serving
his punishment.  The discharge was based upon one incident in 28 months of
service.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 18 May 1993.  The application submitted in this case is
dated 24 October 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant received an enlistment waiver for two alcohol related
convictions and entered active duty on 6 April 1991.  He completed training
as an infantryman and was posted to Korea where he was advanced to pay
grade E-4 and served a year without a discreditable incident of record.  He
was reassigned to Fort Campbell, Kentucky on 15 September 1992.

4.  On 28 December 1992 the applicant submitted a urine sample that tested
positive for marijuana.  He was reduced to pay grade E-1 by NJP.  He was
arrested by civilian authorities for driving under the influence (DUI) on
30 January 1993.

5.  The applicant was counseled, on 23 February 1993 that his request for
discharge due to a bar to reenlistment had been disapproved because he was
going to be processed for elimination for illegal drug use.

6.  On 13 May 1993 the applicant's commander notified him of initiated
elimination proceedings for separation with a general discharge for
commission of a serious offense by using illegal drugs.  The applicant
consulted with counsel
and waived his rights to submit statements in his own behalf and to be
represented by counsel.  He also acknowledged that he could expect to
encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life because of a general
discharge.

7.  The separation authority directed that a general discharge be issued
under the provisions Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c.

8.  On 18 May 1993 the applicant was separated with a general discharge.

9.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the policy and procedures for
separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 applies to separation for
misconduct.  Subparagraphs a, b and c apply to minor disciplinary
infractions, a pattern of misconduct and commission or a serious offence,
respectively.  Subparagraph 14-12c(2) states that abuse of illegal drugs is
a serious offense, but also provides that, if circumstance warrant, a singe
drug offense may be combined with other offense and the individual
separated for minor disciplinary offenses or a pattern of misconduct as
appropriate.  However the narrative reason in all such cases is to be,
"misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs."

10.  On 9 August 1996 the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the
applicant's request to upgrade his discharge, but did decide to change the
narrative reason to simply, "Misconduct."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in
compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural
errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights.

2.  The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were
appropriate considering all the facts of the case.

3.  The discharge was not based upon one incident.  Both using illegal
drugs and DUI are serious offenses.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5.  Records show the applicant exhausted his administrative remedies in
this case when his case was last reviewed by the ADRB on 9 August 1996.  As
a result, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of
any error or injustice to this Board expired on 8 August 1999.  The
applicant did not file within the ABCMR's 3-year statute of limitations and
has not provided compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would
be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to timely file in this
case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__KAN __  __WDP__  __MJNT_  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




            _Kathleen A. Newman_______
                    CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040009797                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050823                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |GD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |19930518                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR635-200, chapter 10 . . . . .         |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |A70.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004563

    Original file (20140004563.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, his record contains a DA Form 3975-1 (Commanders Report of Disciplinary Action) showing his commander verbally reprimanded him for this incident. His record contains a final U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) report of investigation, dated 10 July 1990, which shows the applicant and another Soldier (Jxxxxxx) jointly smoked a cigarette, provided by the applicant, which contained marijuana. The board recommended the applicant be eliminated from military service and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006444

    Original file (20120006444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to upgrade his general under honorable conditions character of service to honorable and change his narrative reason for separation to something more favorable. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2)(a), by reason of "misconduct – abuse of illegal drugs" with a character of service of under honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004992

    Original file (20130004992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. On 21 May 1986, the applicant's commander informed him she was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, for commission of a serious offense – illegal drug abuse. Although an under other than honorable conditions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016613

    Original file (20110016613.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program), covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the RA and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). RE code "3" is the correct code for Soldiers separated by reason of misconduct - commission of a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012462

    Original file (20140012462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    SPD code "JKQ" is the correct code for Soldiers separating under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of misconduct – commission of a serious offense. The evidence of record further shows the applicant's discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with Army standards of acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. The applicant's narrative reason for separation was assigned based on the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008153

    Original file (AR20130008153.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates that on 21 December 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs for wrongfully using cocaine between...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008909

    Original file (20100008909.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 16 February 1993, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation action and directed that the applicant be given an under other than honorable discharge. The applicant contends that his under other than honorable conditions discharge should be upgraded to a general discharge because his discharge was based on two Article 15s for testing positive for marijuana, he was never given a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020293

    Original file (20130020293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge (GD) to an honorable discharge (HD). On 18 May 1994, his commander submitted a recommendation that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c. There is no evidence showing the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000908

    Original file (20080000908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following members, a quorum, were present: The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. A discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. It appears that the applicant's overall record was taken into consideration by the separation authority based on his having received a general discharge, instead of a discharge under other than honorable conditions, which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007469

    Original file (20100007469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 December 2008, the applicant's unit commander notified the applicant that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c, by reason of commission of a serious offense based on the use of illegal drugs. On 13 January 2009, the separation authority directed that the applicant be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c...