Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009719C070208
Original file (20040009719C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        25 AUGUST 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040009719


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock             |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Margaret Patterson            |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Ronald Blakely                |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Linda Barker                  |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  In effect, the applicant requests that his records be corrected to show
that he was retired under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code,
Section 12731b (15 year retirement law) so as to be eligible for retired
pay and benefits at       age 60.

2.  The applicant states that his commander inadvertently recommended
disapproval on his first request to the Medical Board to transfer to the
Retired Reserve with eligibility for retired pay at age 60.  He has since
obtained a corrected request wherein his commander recommended approval.
He was discharged for a medical condition and received no disability rating
from the Army or the Department of Veterans Affairs.  He has over 15, but
less than       20 years of Reserve service.  His unit was activated on 12
January 2003 and he volunteered to go to Iraq.  While processing at Fort
Bliss, Texas, he informed a doctor that he had an artificial knee and knee
joint; however, he was cleared to deploy to Iraq.  When he returned from
Iraq, he was again medically evaluated, and a Physical Evaluation Board
(PEB) met and found him unfit for duty.  He has served his country
honorably for almost 18 years.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his discharge order, a copy of his
         DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty), a copy of his 16 September 2004 request for early qualification for
retired pay, a copy of a summary of his retirement points, a copy of a 4
July 2004 PEB proceedings, a copy of an 11 December 2003 Army Reserve
Command memorandum pertaining to early qualification for Reserve
retirement, a copy of Title 10, United States Code, Section 12731b, a copy
of a page from a document with a portion pertaining to early retirement
highlighted, a copy of a 13 September 2004 memorandum to the applicant to
report for disability separation, and a copy of a Medical Evaluation Board
(MEB) narrative.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve Delayed Entry Program (DEP)
for 8 years on 20 March 1987.  He was discharged from the DEP upon his
enlistment in the Regular Army for 3 years on 21 July 1987.  The applicant
was released from active duty on his ETS (expiration of term of service)
with an honorable characterization of service on 20 July 1990 and
transferred to a Reserve unit in El Paso, Texas.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve for 6 years on 18 March 1995
and reenlisted for another 6 years on 2 December 2000.
3.  An 8 June 2004 Medical Evaluation Board narrative indicates that the
applicant had undergone left total knee arthroplasty in December 2001 for
severe left knee degenerative joint disease.  The narrative indicates that
the applicant had a history of seven prior surgeries on his left knee.  It
indicates that he was activated in January 2003, but since that time and
because of his job requirements he has been required to put an excessive
amount of stress on his left knee.  The examining physician diagnosed his
condition as degenerative joint disease, left knee and status post left
total knee arthroplasty.  He stated that he was unable to satisfactorily
perform his required duties, and did not meet the medical retention
standards.  He recommended that the applicant be referred to a PEB.

4.  On 6 July 2004 a PEB determined that the applicant was unfit because of
his knee condition.  The PEB stated that his condition was found to be
neither service-incurred nor permanently aggravated by subsequent military
service, and consequently he was ineligible for disability compensation,
and therefore separated without disability benefits.  The PEB did indicate
that in accordance with the provisions of Title 10, United States Code,
Section 12731b, he might be eligible to apply for the Army Reserve early
qualification for retired pay program in lieu of separation for disability,
and that he was strongly encouraged to consider requesting termination of
disability processing so he could submit an application through Reserve
component channels.

5.  On 16 September 2004 the applicant requested that he be issued a
memorandum of early qualification for retired pay at age 60 (15 year
memorandum).  On that same date, his commanding officer recommended
approval.

6.  On 17 September 2004 Headquarters, United States Army Air Defense
Artillery Center and Fort Bliss, published Orders 261-0009, assigning the
applicant to the Army Transition Branch at Fort Bliss for transition
processing and discharge from the Army.  On 17 September 2004 the applicant
was discharged from the Army because of his physical disability.  His DD
Form 214 shows that he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation
Enduring Freedom, and that he served on active duty for 8 months and 9
days.  He had almost 4 years of prior active service, and over 12 years of
prior inactive service.

7.  A summary of the applicant’s retirement points shows that he had 16
years of qualifying service for retired pay at age 60.

8.  Army Reserve Command memorandum, dated 11 December 2003, provides
instructions to subordinate commanders for issuance of a 15-year
memorandum. It states that eligible Soldiers must request the memorandum
through command channels to the Human Resource Command at St. Louis, and
certain information, to include the results of the PEB, and a copy of the
order reassigning the Soldier to the Retired Reserve, with the instructions
therein that the Soldier is authorized early retirement under Title 10,
United States Code, Section 12731b.  It stated that upon review of the
necessary documentation, the Human Resources Command will issue to the
Soldier a “Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (15-year
Memorandum).

9.  Title 10, United States Code, Section 12731b, states in effect that a
member of the Selected Reserve who no longer meets the qualifications for
membership solely because he is unfit because of physical disability, may
be treated as having met the service requirements and be provided with the
notification required if he has completed and least 15 and less than 20
years of service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was found unfit for retention in the Army by a PEB and
consequently discharged without disability benefits because of his EPTS
(existed prior to service) condition.  He had over 15 years of qualifying
service, and was eligible to transfer to the Retired Reserve with
entitlement to retired pay at        age 60.

2.  The applicant’s request for the 15-year retirement was submitted on
        16 September 2004.  Consequently, it is obvious that his request
could not be acted upon prior to his discharge on the following day.

3.  The PEB informed the applicant in its July 2004 proceedings of his
eligibility to apply for the early qualification for the retired pay
program.  It would appear reasonable to assume that the applicant did
apply, and as he states, his commander initially and inadvertently
recommended disapproval.  There appears to be no good reason why his
commanding officer would intentionally recommend disapproval on a request
of this nature.  Therefore, the applicant’s contention that his commander
unintentionally and inadvertently recommended disapproval of his request,
and by extension, caused him to be discharged from the Army, despite the
fact that he was eligible for the 15-year retirement program, is accepted.


4.  An injustice had been done to the applicant.  Therefore, as a matter of
equity and in all fairness, the applicant’s records should be corrected as
he has requested.

5.  Consequently, Orders 261-0009, dated 17 September 2004, issued by
Headquarters, United States Army Air Defense Artillery Center and Fort
Bliss, assigning the applicant to the Army Transition Branch at Fort Bliss,
should be revoked.  It is null and void and of no force or effect.  By the
same token, the applicant’s DD Form 214 is also null and void and of no
force or effect, and should be invalidated.

6.  The applicant should be transferred to the Retired Reserve effective on
        17 September 2004 with authorization for early retirement under
Title 10, United States Code, Section 12731b.  The applicant should be
issued a notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (15-year
memorandum).

BOARD VOTE:

__MP ___  ___RB __  ___LB __  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
revoking the above-mentioned Fort Bliss discharge order, and invalidating
the    17 September 2004 DD Form 214; and by transferring the individual
concerned  to the Retired Reserve effective on 17 September 2004 with
authorization for early retirement under Title 10 Untied States Code,
Section 12731b, and issuing him a notification of eligibility for retired
pay at age 60 (15-year memorandum).





                                  ____Margaret Patterson______
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040009719                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050825                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |136.03                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000450C070205

    Original file (20060000450C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Once the Soldier has been issued the 15 or 20 year retirement memorandum, the Soldier will be REFAD and transferred to the Retired Reserve using Order Format 523. However, that Board should have taken the additional step to show that an order was issued utilizing Format 526 to reassign the applicant for separation processing and that an order utilizing Form 523 was issued to REFRAD the applicant effective 17 September 2004 and assign him to the Retired Reserve. BOARD VOTE: __SP ___ __CD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083813C070212

    Original file (2003083813C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was eligible for transfer to the Retired Reserve under Title 10, US Code, Section 12731b; however, he was not aware of the proper procedures on how to apply. However, there are no provisions in active Army Regulations to transfer a Regular Army enlisted member to the Retired Reserve.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03091500C070212

    Original file (03091500C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Washington, D.C. PEB indicated that 10 U.S.C., Section 12731b provides that Soldiers with non-duty related medically disqualifying conditions who had at least 15 but less than 20 qualifying years for Reserve retirement could request reassignment to the Retired Reserve with early qualification for Reserve Retired pay at age 60. Army Regulation 135-101 prescribes policy, procedures, and eligibility criteria for appointment in the Reserve Components of the Army for Army Medical Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000643

    Original file (20140000643.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There was no LD determination in his case file. It states that eligible Soldiers must request the memorandum through command channels to HRC, and certain information, to include the results of the PEB and a copy of the order reassigning the Soldier to the Retired Reserve, with the instructions therein that the Soldier is authorized early retirement under 10 USC 12731b.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001268C070206

    Original file (20050001268C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He diagnosed the applicant’s condition as right knee pain, status post right total knee arthroplasty, and stated that he had moderate to severe activity-related pain of the right knee that had worsened over the last three months since surgery, that his upper extremity use was limited at the right wrist because of his persistent chronic right wrist pain, and that his right knee pain was exacerbated by excessive walking or standing. The evidence shows that the applicant had problems with his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001268C070206

    Original file (20050001268C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    He diagnosed the applicant’s condition as right knee pain, status post right total knee arthroplasty, and stated that he had moderate to severe activity-related pain of the right knee that had worsened over the last three months since surgery, that his upper extremity use was limited at the right wrist because of his persistent chronic right wrist pain, and that his right knee pain was exacerbated by excessive walking or standing. Now, after perusing Army Regulation 40-501, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028537

    Original file (20100028537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The presumption is that the Army was correct in retiring the Soldier with 15 years of military service for a non-line of duty condition. Instead, he was separated under the non-duty related process for conditions that he clearly received while on active duty. c. Paragraph 8-9 states that a Soldier not on extended active duty, who is unfit because of physical disability: (1) May be permanently retired or have his or her name placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL), if he or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002675

    Original file (20130002675.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. A DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings) that shows on 25 May 2004 an informal PEB reviewed the applicant's DD Form 2808, dated 21 April 2004, along with his medical records and found him physically unfit due to bilateral knee pain with a history of separate injuries to both knees and degenerative arthritis. The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he was retired due to physical disability because the MEB and PEB only considered his bilateral knee pain and failed to consider...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015573

    Original file (20080015573.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he received a 20 percent disability rating for an injury to his knee while on active duty but should have been medically retired due to the effects of his injury. It states that he was found not qualified for service with a physical profile of 113111 and recommended that he appear before an MEB. The PEB stated that based on a review of the objective medical evidence of record, it found the applicant's medical and physical impairment prevented...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014487

    Original file (20090014487.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It also advised the applicant that as a result of his medical disqualification, if he had at least 15 but less than 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay purposes, he could request reassignment to the Retired Reserve with early qualification of eligibility to receive retired pay at age 60. In it, he elected to be transferred to the Retired Reserve with early qualification to receive retired pay at age 60 because he had completed at least 15 years but less than 20 years of...