Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009448C070208
Original file (20040009448C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:          16 August 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040009448


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Rosa M. Chandler              |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Melvin H. Meyer               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. John T. Meixell               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. James B. Gunlicks             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests promotion to the rank of Sergeant (SGT), E-5,
with an effective date of rank (DOR) of 1 January 2004.

2.  The applicant states that his name was erroneously removed from the
promotion selection by name list.

3.  The applicant provides in support of his request a:

      a.  Memorandum, United States Army Human Resource Command (HRC),
Alexandria, Virginia, dated 22 June 2004.

      b.  Orders Number 273-16, Headquarters , National Training Center
(NTC) Fort Irwin, California, dated 29 September 2004.

      c.  Letter, Headquarters, NTC, Fort Irwin, dated 13 October 2004.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 4 June 2004, the applicant was honorably released from active duty
and transferred to the United States Army Reserve.  He had completed 4
years,
0 months and 0 days of active military service.  There is no evidence of
indiscipline or pending actions against him.  There also is no evidence the
applicant completed the Primary Leadership Development Course (PLDC).

2.  On 22 June 2004, the HRC approved a request for exception to policy to
reinstate the applicant's name to the promotion selection by-name-list and
to subsequently promote him to SGT, with a retroactive DOR and effective
date of
1 January 2004, granted he was otherwise eligible.  The authority cited for
promotion is:  Army Regulation 600-8-19, the appropriate Headquarters,
Department of the Army (HQDA) cutoff-scores memorandum and the 22 June 2004
memorandum shown in paragraph 3a above.

3.  Orders Number 273-16 shows the applicant's primary military
occupational specialty (MOS) 88N was withdrawn; he was awarded MOS 96B
(Intelligence Analyst); and promoted to SGT in MOS 96B with a DOR and
effective date of
1 January 2004.  The authority cited for the promotion is paragraph 3-34h,
Army Regulation 600-8-19 and Department of the Army Approval Memorandum,
22 June 2004, Subject: DA Promotion Point Cut-off Scores for 1 December
2003.
4.  On 13 October 2004, the Inspector General (IG) Office, Fort Irwin
advised the applicant that an investigation had determined he was
erroneously removed from a promotable status list.  Subsequently, an
exception to policy was submitted and approved for retroactive promotion to
SGT, effective 1 January 2004.  However, he had already been separated as a
result of expiration term of service (ETS); therefore, his only option was
to submit his request to this Board for retroactive promotion to SGT.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 prescribes the enlisted promotions and
reductions function of the military personnel system.  Effective 1 October
1992, this regulation provided in pertinent part that Soldiers were
required to be graduates of PLDC prior to promotion to SGT.  Soldiers were
allowed to compete for promotion to SGT, but could not be promoted to SGT
until completion of PLDC.  Soldiers who met a cutoff score for SGT, but
were not PLDC graduates were promoted effective the date of graduation from
PLDC.

6.  Army Regulation 140-158 (Army Reserve, Enlisted Personnel
Classification, Promotion, and Reduction), effective 17 January 1998
provided for the conditional promotion of SGT through master sergeant
(MSG).  The promotion was awarded with the condition the Soldier was to
enroll in and successfully complete the Noncommissioned Officer Education
System (NCOES) Course required for the grade to which promoted.  The
Soldier agreed that if he or she failed to meet the following conditions:
Soldier was subsequently denied enrollment, or became an academic failure,
or did not meet graduation requirements, or was declared a "No-Show", the
Soldier was subject to reduction under AR 140-158, paragraph 7-12d, to the
grade and rank held prior to promotion. The Soldier further understood that
if reduced, service performed in the higher grade was not considered for
retirement, DOR, or any other determinations dependent on the higher
grade."

7.  According to the HRC website, effective 1 January 2004, in support of
on-going operations, NCOES requirements for promotion to SGT through
sergeant first class (SFC) were suspended until further notice.  Soldiers
that were currently promoted conditionally to SGT through SFC based on the
NCOES promotion requirements were considered promoted without further
condition and no promotion order or adjustments were required.  This change
applies to the Active Army, Army National Guard of the United States and
the United States Army Reserve.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was erroneously removed from the promotion selection by-
name-list.  Had he not been erroneously removed, he would have been
promoted to SGT in MOS 96B prior to being separated from active duty with a
DOR and effective date of 1 January 2004.

2.  Even though there is no evidence to support that he graduated from
PLDC, based on the fact that he was on the promotion list and met the
promotion cut-off scores he should have been promoted without further
condition.

3.  Therefore it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's record to
show he was promoted to SGT in MOS 96B with a DOR and effective date of 1
January 2004.  He should also be paid all back pay and allowances that he
was authorized had he been promoted on this date.

BOARD VOTE:

__mhm___  __jtm___  __jbg___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
      a.  Restoring him to the promotion selection by-name-list as though he
had never been removed;
      b.  Promoting him to SGT in MOS 96B, with a DOR and effective date of
1 January 2004; and
c.  Providing him back pay and allowances in the rank of SGT, effective
1 January 2004.


                 Melvin H. Meyer
            ______________________
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040009448                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050816                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |(GRANT)                                 |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |129.0000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610255C070209

    Original file (9610255C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She attended the following class, and was promoted on 7 December 1995, the graduation date of that class. Notwithstanding the opinion from the PERSCOM official, the applicant could not have requested a waiver of the BNCOC requirement prior to her promotion because there was no need to do so - she was unaware that she had been scheduled for the May 1995 class until after she had been promoted. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005350

    Original file (20150005350.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request to correct his record to show he was promoted to the rank/pay grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) and effective date of 1 July 2013 instead of 1 December 2013. The applicant states, in effect, on 2 May 2013, he appeared before the promotion board and was recommended for promotion to the rank/pay grade of SGT/E-5. a. Paragraph 5a states "Soldiers may be eligible for a retroactive promotion under the ARC process...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000209

    Original file (20150000209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion to sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5 effective 1 August 2013 and all back pay due as a result. The applicant provides: * four promotion point worksheets (PPW) – Unofficial Copy * an HRC memorandum, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 August 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues for the Active Army (AA) * a memorandum, subject: Request an Administrative Records Correction (ARC) for [Applicant], issued by Headquarters, 532nd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002192

    Original file (20080002192.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to reflect that he was promoted to the rank of sergeant, effective 1 May 2003. The regulation in effect on May 2003 provided, in pertinent part, conditional promotions for Soldiers who have met a cutoff score and are otherwise qualified, but have not completed PLDC, are authorized to be promoted (when approved by the promotion authority) when they are reflected on the OML for PLDC attendance, when they are operationally...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100780C070208

    Original file (2004100780C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jonathon K. Rost | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. This HRC promotion official states the applicant had not completed the PLDC requirement for promotion to SGT on 1 April 2003 and the promotion authority did not authorize his conditional promotion at that time. It further states that soldiers who have met a cut-off score and are otherwise qualified, but have not completed PLDC may be conditionally promoted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100686C070208

    Original file (2004100686C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a 27 June 2003 surgical follow-up report, the applicant's attending physician offered the opinion that the applicant's back condition had its onset with the injury recorded in 1992 and that the condition was exacerbated during the April 2001 APFT. The applicant's Noncommissioned Officers Evaluations Reports (NCOERs), for the reporting periods between December 1998 and April 2004, indicate that he successfully performed duties as a sergeant first class (SFC) and was recommended for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014443

    Original file (20080014443.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication or evidence in the applicant's records that she was enrolled in or completed Phase II of MOS 54B BNCOC as stipulated in her promotion orders. The evidence of record further shows the applicant was conditionally promoted to SSG/E-6 on 30 June 1998 in MOS 54B contingent upon her successful completion of BNCOC. With respect to the applicant's contention that she should be considered for promotion to SFC/E-7, there is no evidence that the applicant met grade and/or NCOES...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610726C070209

    Original file (9610726C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 3-18j states, in effect, that the promotion packet of a soldier on the recommended list will be kept in the soldier’s records and a copy in the promotions section until the soldier is promoted. The applicant met the cutoff score for promotion to pay grade E-5 on 1 July 1996. RECOMMENDATION: That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was promoted to pay grade E-5 effective and with a date of rank of 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066094C070421

    Original file (2001066094C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show he was promoted to Sergeant (SGT), E-5 with an effective date of 1 December 2000. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides none to show he completed PLDC, a requirement for promotion to SGT, prior to the date he met the cutoff score...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019947

    Original file (20090019947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The advisory official stated that after a thorough review of the applicant's records, his office recommends his reinstatement to the rank of SFC with the understanding that he will not be eligible for promotion to master sergeant (MSG) until he completes all required NCO education courses. Neither promotion order indicates his promotion was conditional upon completion of NCOES. a. Paragraph 1-27 (NCOES Requirement for Promotion and Conditions Promotion) states that a Soldier must be a WLC...