Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009334C070208
Original file (20040009334C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        26 JULY 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040009334


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Deborah L. Brantley           |     |Senior Analyst       |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Linda Simmons                 |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Patrick McGann                |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Leonard Hassell               |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected so she
can receive her “letter for retirement.”

2.  The applicant states that she served “with the US Army Reserve System
after discharge from Active Duty until 8 August 1985.”  She states that
“totals 20 years.” She states that her 12 November 1993 Chronological
Statement of Retirement Points shows a total of 22 years, 2 months, and 3
days, but it shows “non qualifying years.”

3.  She noted that when she enlisted in the US Army Reserve her recruiter
told her since her enlistment date was the same as her active duty date she
would “receive credit for the six (6) years….”

4.  The applicant states that she was an “active Reserve and enlisted
during this time” but “due to paper work being misfiled” she cannot receive
her “letter for retirement.”  She states all the years that she put in are
worth nothing and she is getting “screwed” from benefits.  She states she
feels she has earned the “ID Card of Retired Armed Forces.”

5.  The applicant provides a copy of her November 1993 statement of
retirement points.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 5 August 1987.  The application submitted in this case is
dated
22 October 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.




3.  Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant enlisted in
the Women’s Army Corps and entered active duty on 9 August 1965 for a
period of 3 years.

4.  The Universal Military Training and Service Act, as amended by the
Reserve Forces Act of 1955, in effect at the time of the applicant’s
enlistment, provided that only males incurred the 6 year statutory service
obligation under those laws.

5.  On 28 July 1967 the applicant, at her request, was honorably discharged
as a result of pregnancy.  Her separation document specifically notes that
she was not transferred to a Reserve component and that she had no
Universal Military Training and Service Act obligation.

6.  On 11 August 1973 the applicant reenlisted in the United States Army
Reserve.  She remained a member of the United States Army Reserve until she
was honorably discharged on 5 August 1987.

7.  According to the November 1993 Statement of Retirement Points, the
applicant had accumulated 4 years, 11 months, and 20 days of qualifying
service for retirement purposes, although she was credited with 22 years, 2
months, and 3 days, of total service for longevity pay purposes.  Her 4
years, 11 months, and 20 days included her 1 year, 11 months, and 20 days
of active Federal service and her United States Army Reserve service based
on her RYE (retirement year ending) in 1974, 1976, and 1979.

8.  In May 2005 the applicant’s Statement of Retirement Points was
corrected by officials at the United States Army Human Resources Command in
St. Louis, Missouri to show that, in addition to her 1 year, 11 months, and
20 days of active Federal Service, she had qualifying years of service for
retirement purposes for her RYE in 1974, and in RYE 1976 through 1981, for
a total of 8 years, 11 months, and 20 days.  Between 1981 and 1987, when
the applicant was honorably discharged from the United States Army Reserve
she acquired no more qualifying years of service for retirement purposes.

9.  A copy of the new statement was provided to the applicant for comment,
but to date she has not responded.

10.  Army Regulation 135-180 implements statutory authorities (Title 10,
United States Code, sections 12731 through 12738) governing the granting of
retired pay to Soldiers and former Reserve Component Soldiers.  Paragraph 2-
1 of that regulation states, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for
retired pay, an individual need not have a military status at the time of
application, but must have attained age 60, completed a minimum of 20 years
of qualifying (emphasis added) service, and served the last 8 years of his
qualifying service as a Reserve component soldier.

11.  Paragraph 2-8 of the aforementioned regulation describes qualifying
service, as pertains to this case, as service performed as an enlisted
person in an active status in a Reserve component or in active Federal
service.  After 30 June 1949, a reservist must earn a minimum of 50
retirement points each retirement year to have that year credited as
qualifying service.

12.  In a 29 October 1999 memorandum the Secretary of Defense put forth a
policy which entitles former members of the Reserve components who are
eligible to receive retired pay at age 60 under Title 10, United States
Code, section 12731, but who have terminated their Reserve status, to
entitlement to receive benefits provided for under chapter 54, Title 10,
United States Code.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant may have been affiliated with the United States
Army for more than 20 years, unfortunately, evidence available to the Board
indicates that at most the applicant would have accumulated no more than 8
years, 11 months, and 20 days of qualifying service for retirement
purposes.  As such, she would not have had sufficient qualifying service to
meet eligibility requirements for retired pay at age 60 and would not be
eligible for an Army Identification Card.

2.  Even if the applicant would have incurred a 6-year statutory service
obligation as a result of her 1965 enlistment in the Women’s Army Corps,
she would have been required to accumulate at least 50 retirement points
during the years between her discharged from the Army in 1967 and her
enlistment in the United States Army Reserve in 1973.  There is no evidence
that she accumulated any points during those intervening years.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in
error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would
satisfy that requirement.

4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 5 August 1987; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on
4 August 1990.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of
limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to
show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to
timely file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___LS  __  ___PM __  __LH ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  _____ Linda Simmons________
                                            CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040009334                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050726                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |136.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040005833C070208

    Original file (040005833C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    When his active Federal service time is added to his years of qualifying service as a member of the United States Army Reserve, he had a total of 18 years, 11 months, and 28 days of satisfactory service, for retirement purposes, as of his RYE date of 19 November 2003. The applicant’s argument that because he accumulated 364 retirement points at the time of his release from active duty in 1976, which far exceeded that “required in Reserve status,” he should now be granted a full “qualifying”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011643

    Original file (20070011643.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that she would like a 15-year retirement letter because she is not able to actively participate in a unit of the United States Army Reserve (USAR) due to her medical condition. The applicant's military personnel records show she successfully completed 14 years of qualifying service in the USAR and ARNG from her initial enlistment on 10 July 1976 to her honorable discharge on 20 November 2000. Based on the provisions of law in effect at the time the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010876C070208

    Original file (20040010876C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was in the Army for 24 years but is only being credited with 18 years of qualifying service. While the applicant may have been affiliated with the United States Army in various components for more than 20 years, unfortunately, evidence available to the Board indicates that at most the applicant would have accumulated no more than 18 years of qualifying service for retirement purposes. While the applicant may have believed at the time of his 1998...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008542

    Original file (20060008542.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, his records be corrected to show he completed 20 qualifying years of service for a non-regular retirement and that he be issued a 20-year letter. His discharge order from AR-PERCEN, St. Louis, shows reason as "Completed 20 or more Years Reserve Duty." In a 6 June 2006 letter from HRC-St. Louis, the applicant was informed that he was never issued a 20-year letter, only an order that incorrectly notified him that he had 20 years of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067568C070402

    Original file (2002067568C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As supporting evidence he provides the 22 September 1988 letter from his doctor, an ARPC Form 249-2-E dated 2 March 2000, a 4 December 2001 letter from the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERSCOM) denying his application for retired pay, a Retirement Points Accounting System Summary Points Inquiry dated 4 December 2001, and his discharge orders dated 28 September 1988. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011648

    Original file (20060011648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This regulation specifies, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for retired pay an individual must have attained age 60 and completed a minimum of 20 years of qualifying service and that subsequent to 1 July 1949, qualifying service is granted only for each year of service an individual earns 50 or more retirement points. During his periods of USAR service covering 20 July 1993 through 19 July 1994, the applicant was credited with 38 points (15 membership points, 13 active duty points and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014936

    Original file (20130014936.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show she qualifies for a Reserve retirement at age 60. She provides: * ARPC Forms 249-2-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) * Defense Finance and Accounting Service Military Leave and Earnings Statements (LESs) * DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and/or (Report of Separation from Active Duty) * Orders 121-003, dated 21 March 1994 * Orders 1-2, dated 11 January 1991 * Orders 073-011, dated 21...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064621C070421

    Original file (2001064621C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her husband’s records be corrected to show that his last year of service was qualifying for retired pay. In that memorandum the CG requests a waiver to allow the FSM’s records to be corrected to show that he had 20 qualifying years of service for retired pay purposes. There is no basis in law or regulation to grant the applicant’s request; to show that the year the FSM died was qualifying for retired pay.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017153C070206

    Original file (20050017153C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence available to the Board suggests the applicant was separated from the Army National Guard because officials issuing her separation documents believed that she met the eligibility requirements for receipt of retired pay at age 60 and that she had reached her mandatory removal date. After further review it appears that a better way to correct the applicant’s record would be to count 5 of the last qualifying Reserve component years as the periods ending 23 March 1990, 10 July 2000,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007982C070205

    Original file (20060007982C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show that she was entitled to retired pay at age 60 with completion of 18 years of qualifying service. Army Regulation 135-180 states in paragraph 2-3, that a 20-Year Letter will be issued to the Reserve Component Soldier within 1 year after they complete 20 years of qualifying service for retirement. The applicant completed 18 years of qualifying service for retired pay benefits when she was transferred to the Retired Reserve...