Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009019C070208
Original file (20040009019C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            2 August 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR20040009019


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Lisa O. Guion                 |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. William D. Powers             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Robert L. Duecaster           |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Jeanette R. McCants           |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his entry grade in the Army
Nurse Corps (ANC) be changed from Captain (CPT) to Major (MAJ).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that in May 2003 he spoke with an ANC
recruiter about the possibility being accessed into the Army and before he
would proceed with his application, he informed the recruiter he would
accept no rank less than MAJ.  He indicates that a field grade template was
sent to him and he completed all necessary documents and returned the
packet.  In July 2003, his recruiter informed him that he would be accessed
into the Army as a MAJ, and on 15 September 2003, he was notified that his
application was approved and that he was to be accessed into the Army in
the rank of MAJ.  He also states that on 18 September 2003, he was
commissioned in the ANC in the rank of MAJ.  He further states that the
next day, 19 September 2003, he was informed that a mistake had been made
in determining his active duty entry grade.  A United States Army
Recruiting Command (USAREC) official told him that his entry grade would be
CPT because there was mistake made in the process used to calculate his
constructive service credit.

3.  The applicant further states that he does not dispute his constructive
service calculation is correct according to regulation; however, given he
had been assured his entry grade would be MAJ throughout the entire
accession process and because he actually took the oath of office in that
grade, his entry grade should be changed anyway.  He contends that he
should not be penalized because of someone else made a mistake.  He finally
states that when faced with the decision to continue his life outside the
ANC or to accept a commission in the rank of CPT, he chose to serve his
country as an ANC officer.

4.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of his
application:  an email from USAREC dated 1 July 2003, three Officer
Evaluation Reports
(DA Form 67-9, Biographical Summary dated 11 October 2004; U.S. Army Human
Resources Command (AHRC) Orders Number (#) M-07-402600R dated 23 July 2004;
AHRC Orders # M-07-402600 dated 14 July 2004; and AHRC Orders # A-10-394056
dated 30 October 2003.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s record shows that he is currently serving on active
duty at the Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.  His
record shows he was appointed a CPT in the ANC of the United States Army
Reserve (USAR) on 12 January 2004.
2.  In connection with his appointment processing, a Record of Award of
Entry Grade Credit Health Services Officers (DA Form 5074-1-R) was prepared
on the applicant on 29 September 2003.  This document confirms he was
granted a total of 7 years, 1 month, and 29 days of constructive service
credit based on his prior service.  It also shows that 3 years, and 4
months of the constructive service credit was required for his entry grade
of CPT, and the remaining
3 years, 9 months and 29 days of constructive service credit was applied
for date of rank (DOR) purposes, which resulted in his CPT DOR being
established as
13 March 2000.

3.  Army Regulation 135-101 (Appointment of Reserve Commissioned Officers
for Assignment to Army Medical Department Branches) prescribes policy,
procedures, and eligibility criteria for appointment in the Reserve
Components of the Army, with or without concurrent active duty, in the six
branches of the Army Medical Department (AMEDD).  Chapter 3 contains
guidance on awarding entry grade credit for Reserve appointment grade
determination.  Paragraph 3-4 (Transition Credit) states, in pertinent
part, that the law and regulations in effect on the date of the appointment
will determine the grade and date of rank upon appointment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions that he should have been appointed a MAJ in
the ANC based on the initial approval made by a USAREC official in that
rank and his initial sworn oath of office and the supporting documents he
provided were carefully considered.  However, these factors are not
sufficiently mitigating to support relief in this case.

2.  The governing regulation clearly stipulates that the law and
regulations in effect on the date of the appointment will determine the
grade and date of rank upon appointment.  The policy in effect at the time
of the applicant’s appointment authorized an entry grade of CPT based on
the constructive service credit he was awarded.  An entry grade of MAJ
required constructive service beyond what the applicant was granted.
Therefore, he was properly granted an entry grade of CPT with a DOR
adjustment based on the constructive service credit he had been credited
with in excess of that required for his entry grade.

3.  By the applicant’s own admission, there is no error in the constructive
service credit he was granted.  He further acknowledges that after learning
a mistake had been made in determining his entry grade, he was given the
option of accepting the ANC appointment as a CPT, or not to be appointed.

4.  Although, the initial administrative errors made that led him to
believe his entry grade would be were unfortunate, after these mistakes
came to light and were rectified, he voluntarily elected to accept his
appointment in the entry grade of CPT.  As a result, there appears to be no
error or injustice related to the entry grade he was assigned.  Therefore,
there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the
requested relief.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___WDP_  ___RLD _  __JRM__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




            ____William D. Powers ___
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040009019                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |NA                                      |
|DATE BOARDED            |2005/08/02                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |NA                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |NA                                      |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |NA                                      |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |NA                                      |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |112.0200                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008576

    Original file (20090008576.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides a Statement for Commissioning AMEDD Officer, dated 8 October 2008, which indicates he would be commissioned into a Troop Program Unit in the rank of CPT and that he would be assessed into the ANC, USAR in the rank of CPT. An entry grade of CPT required constructive service beyond what the applicant was granted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067966C070402

    Original file (2002067966C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her record be corrected to show her correct captain (CPT) date of rank (DOR) based on her receiving all the constructive credit to which she is entitled. A corrected Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit-Health Services Officers (DA Form 5074-1-R) was provided with this advisory opinion. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the applicant’s CPT DOR is 26 January 1995 based on the constructive...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015103

    Original file (20060015103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    (As a result, the Regional Personnel Actions Division, Army Reserve Personnel Command, St. Louis, Missouri, indicated that it had administratively corrected the applicant's records to show 3 years of constructive service credit; however, in doing so, actually only credited the applicant with 2 years and 364 days of constructive credit (i.e., 14 January 1981), not 3 years of constructive credit (i.e., 13 January 1981).) On 22 January 2004, the USAR ANC PM provided an advisory opinion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005916C070208

    Original file (20040005916C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    HRC personnel officials confirm the applicant was appointed a USAR MC officer on 16 November 1998, and that based on the governing regulation, the 6 years, 10 months and 11 days of constructive service credit she received in excess of the entry grade requirement of 4 years, was applied to her DOR, which was established as 5 January 1992. The evidence of record in this case clearly shows that the applicant accrued her anesthetist experience prior to earning the medical degree that supported...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012123

    Original file (20060012123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this message, the MC career advisor confirms the applicant's PHD in Nutrition is adjunct to his profession and that it was obtained prior to completion of his medical degree; therefore, he should have been awarded constructive service credit at the time of his appointment. The evidence of record contains a January 2005 e-mail from an AHRC MC Career Advisor, which confirms the applicant's PHD in Nutrition adds adjunct skills to his profession. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014722

    Original file (20110014722.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 3 of the same regulation provides guidance on grade determinations and states, in pertinent part, that the grade upon original appointment in the AMEDD will be determined by the number of years of entry-grade credit awarded and will be recorded on a DA Form 5074-R (Record of Award of Entry-Grade Credit – Medical and Dental Officers) and that the form will be forwarded to HRC for DOR determinations. Army policy provides that grade and date of rank upon original appointment and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029940

    Original file (20100029940.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The orders stated: Effective on the date of entry on active duty, you are appointed in the Reserve grade of CPT and placed on the ADL in the grade of CPT in accordance with Army Regulation 135-101 (Appointment of Commissioned Officers for Assignment to AMEDD Branches). a. Paragraph 1-10 (promotion eligibility) states in sub-paragraph 1-10e that officers in the following categories (some not applicable in the applicant's case) are not eligible for consideration by a promotion selection...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014975

    Original file (20120014975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * her original DOR to the rank of captain (CPT) was 1 May 2005 * she was selected for the Funded Nurse Education Program (FNEP) and began the program on 10 December 2007 * as a condition of the program, she transferred branches to the Army Nurse Corps (ANC) after she received her nursing degree on 30 August 2009 * her DOR was then recalculated * before her DOR was adjusted, she was selected for promotion to the rank of major (MAJ) * after the U.S. Army Human Resources...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017662

    Original file (20100017662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For individuals with more than 7 years but less than 14 years grade credit, the entry grade would be CPT. The evidence of records shows the applicant was accepted for commissioning and executed an oath of office in the USAR in the rank of CPT. However, by law and regulation, the grade and DOR upon original appointment and assignment to an AMEDD branch is determined by the number of years of entry grade credit awarded.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017390

    Original file (20110017390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show adjustment in rank or date of rank (DOR) based on being granted constructive credit upon reentering the U.S. Army. Orders Number 294-002, issued by USA HRC, Fort Knox, KY, dated 21 October 2011, announced the applicant's promotion status and shows she was appointed in the rank of MAJ with an active DOR (ADOR) of 30 January 2008. Based on her prior active service and TIG in the rank of MAJ (i.e., 2 years and 2 months), the applicant's...