Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008508C070208
Original file (20040008508C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            9 June 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040008508


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Melvin H. Meyer               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Lester Echols                 |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Carol A. Kornhoff             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his retired grade be adjusted to E-8.

2.  The applicant states that he had served on active duty satisfactorily
in the grade of E-8.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 3 January 2002; his E-8
promotion orders; his separation from active duty orders; orders assigning
him to the Retired Reserve; a 19 July 2004 letter to the Defense Finance
and Accounting Service (DFAS); Active Guard Reserve (AGR) orders; seven
leave and earnings statements for the months February through August 1981;
two military pay vouchers for the pay periods ending 27 June 1981 and 30
August 1981; and a   letter from the U. S. Army Human Resources Command –
St. Louis, MO dated 20 September 2004.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 9 August 1965.  He
was promoted to First Sergeant, E-8 on 26 February 1981.

2.  The applicant provided seven leave and earnings statements which show
he attended unit training on a regular monthly basis from the time he was
promoted to E-8 until he entered active duty in an AGR status.  He provided
two pay vouchers which show that during the period 10 through 27 June 1981
he performed 18 days of active duty while in pay grade E-8 and during the
period     28 through 30 August 1981 he performed 3 days of active duty
while in pay grade E-8.

3.  The applicant was ordered to active duty in an AGR status effective 31
August 1981 in the rank and grade of Platoon Sergeant, E-7 under the
authority of Title 32, U. S. Code, section 502(f).

4.  Effective 1 May 1984, the applicant was laterally appointed to Sergeant
First Class (SFC), E-7.

5.  State of Montana, Office of The Adjutant General orders 304-013 dated
     31 October 2001 discharged the applicant from the Army National Guard
and
assigned him to the Retired Reserve effective 3 January 2003.  The
additional instructions stated in part, "Officer/Soldier is eligible to
retire at 1SG/E8."

6.  Headquarters, 7th Infantry Division and Fort Carson orders 331-0001
dated 27 November 2001 released the applicant from active duty because of
physical disability and placed him on the retired list effective 4 January
2002 in the retired grade of SFC.  The orders indicated that the statute
authorizing his retirement was section 1201 [Title 10, U. S. Code]
(physical disability retirement for Regulars and members on active duty for
more than 30 days).

7.  The applicant was released from active duty on 3 January 2002 in the
rank and grade of SFC, E-7 after completing 21 years, 9 months, and 12 days
of creditable active service.

8.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1372(2) states that, unless entitled to a
higher retired grade under some other provision of law, any member of an
armed force who is retired for physical disability under section 1201 or
1204 of this title is entitled to the grade equivalent to the highest
temporary grade or rank in which he served satisfactorily, as determined by
the Secretary of the armed force from which he is retired.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows the applicant served as an E-8 in the Army
National Guard from the date he was promoted in February 1981 until the day
before he was ordered to active duty, in the grade of E-7, in an AGR status
on  31 August 1981.  The available evidence also shows that he performed
active duty in June 1981 and in August 1981 while in the grade of E-8.

2.  The applicant entered active duty in an AGR status on 31 August 1981
under the authority of Title 32, U. S. Code, section 502(f).  It appears he
accepted an administrative reduction to pay grade E-7 in order to do so.
He continued to serve until he was released from active duty on 3 January
2002 by reason of physical disability under the provisions of Title 10, U.
S. Code, section 1201 after completing more than 20 years of active
service.

3.  In accordance with Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1372(2), the applicant
was entitled to retire in the highest grade in which he served
satisfactorily.  Therefore, given his previous satisfactory service in the
rank of E-8, it appears he met the statutory requirement to be placed on
the retired list on 4 January 2002 in the grade of E-8.

BOARD VOTE:

__mhm___  __le____  __cak___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
amending Headquarters, 7th Infantry Division and Fort Carson orders 331-
0001 dated 27 November 2001 to show he was placed on the retired list
effective        4 January 2002 in the retired grade and rank of First
Sergeant, E-8 and that he be paid any back due retired pay as a result of
this correction.




            __Melvin H. Meyer_____
                    CHAIRPERSON

                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040008508                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050609                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |136.06                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011759

    Original file (20100011759.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank as sergeant first class (SFC)/ E-7. The evidence shows the Maryland Army National Guard issued promotion orders promoting the applicant to SFC/E-7 effective 27 January 2010 per regulatory and statutory guidance, prior to release from active duty on 28 January 2010. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015534

    Original file (20140015534.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 April 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140015534 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, placement on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 vice staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. The BNCOC Phase I distance learning program was transformed into Advanced Leader Course (ALC) - CC delivered via blackboard starting on 1 October 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024097

    Original file (20110024097.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that at the time any member of an armed force who is retired for physical disability is entitled to a grade equivalent to the highest of the following: the grade in which he is serving on the date when his name is placed on the Retired List; the highest grade in which he served satisfactorily; the grade to which he would have been promoted had it not been for the physical disability that resulted in retirement. In accordance with statutory and regulatory...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086239C070212

    Original file (2003086239C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The Board considered the applicant's contention that he requested an administrative reduction to accept an AGR position in 1981 with the understanding that he would get his rank back as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1990-1993 | 9306598

    Original file (9306598.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that he was promoted to pay grade E-6 in 1975, and promoted to pay grade E-7 in February 1981. Army Regulation 15-80 establishes policies, procedure, and responsibilities of the Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB), and states in pertinent part that the AGDRB will make final determinations on behalf of the Secretary of the Army. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was placed on the TDRL...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008821

    Original file (20060008821.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant continues that under the current Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) Soldiers are allowed to be promoted while injured and that paragraph 7-20f(3), states that the promotion criteria for Soldiers who are already promotable and pending a medical evaluation board (MEB) or a physical evaluation board (PEB) referral will not be denied promotion based on medical disqualification if they are otherwise qualified for promotion. The applicant provides copies...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058741C070421

    Original file (2001058741C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military record shows that he was a member of the Army National Guard (ARNG) of Puerto Rico and that he served on active duty in an Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) status from 4 August 1981 through 31 March 1999, at which time he was REFRAD for the purpose of retirement. Paragraph 12-3b(1) contains the general provisions of law governing retirement and it states in pertinent part, that ARNG soldiers serving on active duty at the time of their retirement, in a grade lower than...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065290C070421

    Original file (2001065290C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. It further confirms that he held the rank and pay grade of SFC/E-7 on the date of his separation, and that on the following day he was placed on the Retired List in that rank and pay grade. There are no provisions of law or regulation that provide for the advancement of an enlisted member who served in higher rank and pay grade in a Reserve Component, not on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064460C070421

    Original file (2001064460C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military record shows that he was a member of the Army National Guard (ARNG) and that he entered active duty in an Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) status on 16 August 1981. The applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) confirms, in item 18 (promotions and reductions), that he was promoted to the rank of 1SG/E-8 on 19 May 1981, and that he satisfactorily served in that rank and pay grade until 6 January 1984, at which time he was administratively reduced to the rank...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021691

    Original file (20110021691.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Orders D41-11, dated 1 March 2001, show that on 1 March 2001 he was removed from the TDRL and permanently retired the following day in the grade of rank of SSG/E-6. The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion to SFC with a sequence number of "2" prior to his placement on the TDRL on 25 June 1997. However, he is entitled to correction of his retirement orders to show he was placed on the retired list on 26 June 1997, in the grade of E-7.