Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008354C070208
Original file (20040008354C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        5 May 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040008354


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Michael J. Fowler             |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. James E. Anderholm            |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Leonard G. Hassell            |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Laverne V. Berry              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge be upgraded from
a general (under honorable conditions) discharge to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he suffered stressful and
emotional behavior during his military service and should not be limited
from receiving assistance that he is qualified for as a veteran.

3.  The applicant provides no documentation in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 5 June 1984.  The application submitted in this case is
dated            9 September 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 February 1983 and
successfully completed basic training and advanced individual training.  He
was awarded military occupational specialty 76X (Subsistence Supply
Specialist).

4.  A DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 13 March 1994 (sic), shows the
applicant was issued a temporary profile for being "delusional."

5.  The applicant's medical records are not available.

6.  The commander's request for the applicant to be separated because of
personality disorder packet is not available.

7.  The applicant's service personnel records contain no evidence to show
he was ever convicted by court-martial.  A check of Federal Bureau of
Investigation records verified there is no record of his being convicted by
a court-martial.

8.  The applicant's service personnel records do not contain the facts and
circumstances surrounding his separation process.  However, his DD Form 214
shows that he was discharged on 5 June 1984 under the provisions of
paragraph 5-13 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) by reason
of "personality disorder."  He was discharged with a characterization of
service as general (under honorable conditions) after completing a total of
1 year, 4 months, and 5 days of creditable active service with no lost
days.

9.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that an honorable
discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits
provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the
quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of
acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis
added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization
would be clearly inappropriate.  Whenever there is doubt, it is to be
resolved in favor of the individual.

10.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the
separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13 sets the
policy and prescribes procedures for separating members with a personality
disorder (not amounting to a disability) that interferes with assignment to
or performance of duty.  This condition is a deeply ingrained maladaptive
pattern of behavior of long duration that interferes with the Soldier's
ability to perform duty.  The diagnosis of personality disorder must have
been established by a psychiatrist or doctoral-level clinical psychologist
with necessary and appropriate professional credentials who is privileged
to conduct mental health evaluations for the Department of Defense
components.  Separation because of personality disorder is authorized only
if the diagnosis concludes that the disorder is so severe that the
Soldier's ability to function effectively in the military environment is
significantly impaired.  Separation processing may not be initiated under
this paragraph until the Soldier has been counseled formally concerning
deficiencies and has been afforded ample opportunity to overcome those
deficiencies as reflected in appropriate counseling or personnel records.
When the reason for separation is unsuitability due to personality
disorder, the Soldiers will be furnished an honorable discharge certificate
unless the Soldier has been convicted of an offense by general court-
martial or has been convicted by more than one special court-martial in the
current enlistment period of obligated service or any extension thereof, in
which case the Soldier may be furnished a general discharge certificate.





DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

Records show that the applicant was separated for personality disorder and
issued a general (under honorable conditions) discharge.  However, evidence
of record shows he was not convicted by a general court-martial or more
than one special court-martial during his current service.  Therefore, the
government erred when it issued him a general discharge.  By regulation, he
must have been furnished an honorable discharge.

BOARD VOTE:

__JEA___  __LGH __  __LVB__  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
As a result, the Board recommends that all of the Department of the Army
records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual
concerned was separated from the service with an Honorable Discharge
Certificate on 5 June 1984.

2.  That the Department of the Army issue to him an Honorable Discharge
Certificate from the Army of the United States, dated 5 June 1984, in lieu
of the under honorable conditions discharge of the same date now held by
him.




                            ___JAMES E. ANDERHOLM_
                                      CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040008354                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |5 May 2005                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |GD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |                                        |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020563

    Original file (20090020563.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Soldiers do not know they should request a medical board. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, sets forth the policy and procedures for separation because of personality disorder, and states, under the guidance in chapter 1, section II, a Soldier with less than 24 months of active duty service, as of the date separation proceedings are initiated, may be separated for personality disorder (not amounting to disability (see Army Regulation 635-40)) that interferes with assignment or with...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012691

    Original file (AR20100012691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Characterization of service under honorable conditions may be awarded to a soldier who has been convicted of an offense by general court-martial or who has been convicted by more than one special court-martial in the current enlistment, period of obligated service, or any extension thereof. The analyst noted the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5-13, AR 635-200, by reason of a personality disorder with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00020

    Original file (ND04-00020.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00020 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031001. Separation processing for failing to meet the physical readiness standard (obesity/PRT failure), Parenthood, or Personality Disorders may not be initiated until the member has been counseled by their command concerning deficiencies and has been afforded an opportunity to overcome those deficiencies as reflected on an appropriate Page 13 service record entry. Members may be separated for...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014744

    Original file (AR20100014744.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that upon completion of Phase I & II of his Medical Evaluation Board, due to issues pending with his ex-wife at the time his unit commander requested the quickest route for him to be discharged, and which resulted in a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. The analyst noted the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5-13, AR 635-200, by reason of a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1997_Navy | ND97-01253

    Original file (ND97-01253.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND97-01253 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 970807, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Commander, Naval Military Personnel Command (COMNAVMILPERSCOM), may authorize or direct the separation of enlisted or inducted members prior to the expiration of enlistment or other obligated service for any one of the reasons listed here. A separation initiated while a member is in entry...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00992

    Original file (ND02-00992.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00992 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020708, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The discharge shall remain: UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)/Misconduct - Pattern of Misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 900226: Retention Warning from USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN-71): Advised of deficiency (record of minor misconduct due to...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010900

    Original file (AR20120010900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval with an honorable discharge. On 18 November 2003, the separation authority directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of honorable. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061872C070421

    Original file (2001061872C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The board determined that the applicant was unsuitable for further military service because of character and behavior disorders and recommended discharge from the service because of unsuitability. The service of a soldier separated for a personality disorder will be characterized as honorable. The applicant’s DD Form 214 should be changed to reflect his character of service as honorable.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00249

    Original file (ND02-00249.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thank you Documentation Applicant did not provide any additional documentation for the Board to consider, therefore, only the Applicant's service and medical records were reviewed. Corrective action provided.Note: No record of counseling/retention warning in official record documenting how personality disorder has effected performance, nor did a period of time elapse for the Applicant to correct any deficiencies as specifically related to his personality disorder.920730: Applicant notified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020336

    Original file (20120020336.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. Since the applicant was not in an entry-level status at the time of his discharge and he had no court-martial convictions, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show he was honorably discharged on 9 March 1983 and to issue him an Honorable Discharge Certificate. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...