Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008131C070208
Original file (20040008131C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        21 July 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040008131


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr.             |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John P. Infante               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Robert J. Osborn II           |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Brenda K. Koch                |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests upgrade of his undesirable discharge.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he went AWOL (absent without
leave) because of culture shock.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the Record of Assignments page of his
DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which
occurred on 2 August 1971.  The application submitted in this case is dated
23 September 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant was inducted on 3 March 1969.  He completed basic combat
training but was AWOL from advanced individual training (AIT).  He started
AIT four times and apparently never completed it.

4.  He received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of
Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice for willful disobedience of a
noncommissioned officer, and was convicted of AWOL offenses by a summary
court-martial and a special court martial.

5.  The applicant’s separation examination dated 1 July 1971, indicated
"No" to all questions relating to psychological or emotional problems.

6.  On 27 July 1971 the separation authority approved the applicant's
discharge for the good of the service.

7.  He was discharged on 2 August 1971 for the good of the service.  His
service was characterized as having been under conditions other than
honorable.  He had 4 months and 10 days of creditable service and 384 days
lost time.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the
separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides,
in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses
for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at
any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for
discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  A
discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered
appropriate.  However, at the time of the applicant's separation the
regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no available evidence to show that the applicant experienced
"culture shock" or any other emotional problem.  He did not mention it in
the medical history which he submitted for his separation medical
examination.

2.  In the absence of evidence that he encountered mental, emotional, or
psychological problems so severe as to render him unable to tell right from
wrong and incapable of adhering to the right the assertion of "culture
shock" does nothing to demonstrate an injustice in the discharge.

3.  His record is devoid of any redeeming service and in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings
were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the
time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with his overall
record.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 2 August 1971; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on 1 August 1974 (enter date).  The applicant did not file within
the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling
explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice
to excuse failure to timely file in this case.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__BK  ___  __JPI___  __RJO __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




                                  __   John P. Infante_____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR                                      |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |YYYYMMDD                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |19710802                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 635-200 . . . . .                    |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |SPN 246                                 |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |144.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009190C070208

    Original file (20040009190C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Jeanette R. McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. During his first Vietnam tour the applicant was advanced to pay grade E- 4 in April 1969. While PTSD was not recognized as a specific illness at the time of the applicant's separation from the service, the fact that an individual might not be fit for further military service because of psychosis, psychoneurosis, or neurological disorders was outlined in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088979C070403

    Original file (2003088979C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that his original statement documented a long history of childhood trauma and that he has conducted some additional research regarding Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). In conclusion, the counselor requests that the applicant's discharge be upgraded and that he be restored to society as an honorable member of the military family. While PTSD was not recognized as a specific illness at the time of the applicant’s separation from the service, the fact that an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002316C070206

    Original file (20050002316C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 9 April 1971 the applicant was separated with an undesirable discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Presidential Proclamation 4313, issued on 16 September 1974, provided for the issuance of a clemency discharge to certain former Soldiers who voluntarily entered into and completed an alternate restitution program specifically designed for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006633C070205

    Original file (20060006633C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a more favorable discharge. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 23 November 1976; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086867C070212

    Original file (2003086867C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 December 1970, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge. There is no evidence of record or evidence presented by the applicant which indicates procedural errors which would jeopardize the applicant's rights. The applicant has failed to show evidence that he experienced readjustment problems or PTSD during his period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067534C070402

    Original file (2002067534C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 October 1971, the separation authority approved the recommendation for discharge and directed that he be furnished a General Discharge Certificate. There is no evidence in the available records, and the applicant has provided no evidence, to show that he was diagnosed with a PTSD type illness prior to his discharge. The letter provided by the physician from the DVA stated that the applicant was diagnosed as having PTSD, chronic, with a GAF of 40.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006972

    Original file (20120006972.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The honorable characterization of service is appropriate when the quality of the Soldier’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty; b. a general discharge (GD) is a separation under honorable conditions issued to a Soldier whose military record was satisfactory but not so meritorious as to warrant an honorable discharge; c. a UOTHC discharge is issued when there is one or more acts or omissions that constitute a significant departure from conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073414C070403

    Original file (2002073414C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: At a personal appearance hearing on 12 May 1980, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request to upgrade his discharge. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090689C070212

    Original file (2003090689C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he served in combat, was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and several other awards. The applicant is requesting correction of injustice which occurred on 10 January 1973, the date of his discharge. Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows that while the applicant was assigned to Vietnam he participated in two campaigns.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9508252C070209

    Original file (9508252C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    At Fort Jackson, he went AWOL again; this time from 21 July 1968 to 16 October 1968. He was tried by a general court-martial on 17 March 1971, convicted, and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 10 months, forfeiture of $95 per month for 10 months, and a BCD. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.