Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008051C070208
Original file (20040008051C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        26 July 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040008051


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Prevolia Harper               |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Linda D. Simmons              |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Patrick H. McGann, Jr.        |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Leonard G. Hassell            |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the authority under which he
was separated, and which appears on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the
United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), be corrected.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 shows that he was
separated under the authority of Army Regulation (AR) 635-40A.  He states
that he should have been separated under the authority of AR 635-40.

3.  The applicant provides

      a.  A copy of his DD Form 214.

      b.  An undated document from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

      c.  A document titled "Stop Loss (Active Army-Enlisted).

      d.  Army Regulation 635-40a (Personnel Separations).

      e.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention,
Retirement, or Separation).

      f.  Army Regulation 635-89 (Personnel Separations – Homosexuality).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on 14 February 1961, the date of his separation.  The application
submitted in this case is dated 13 September 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2
years on 2 December 1960.  He served on active duty for 2 months and 13
days before being separated for a physical disability which existed prior
to his entry on active duty.

4.  Following his entry on active duty, the applicant was given a medical
examination on/about 11 January 1961 which revealed that he had a duodenal
ulcer without obstruction.  He was given a medical board on 27 January 1961
which recommended that he be separated for a pre-existing medical
condition, not aggravated by military service.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 indicates that he was separated by reason
of "Physical Disability EPTS" (existing prior to service).  The authority
for separation was listed as AR 635-40A (Personnel Separations – Physical
Evaluation for Retention, Separation or Retirement for Physical
Disability).  AR 635-40A was one of three regulations dealing with physical
disability, the others being AR 635-40B and AR 635-40C.  These regulations
were replaced in May 1967 by AR 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention,
Retirement, or Separation).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his authority for separation as shown on
his DD Form 214 is incorrect.  He believes that the correct authority
should be AR 635-40, not AR 635-40A.

2.  AR 635-40 superseded AR 635-40A/635-40B/635-40C in May 1967.  The
applicant was separated in February 1961.

3.  The applicant was separated under the proper authority in effect at the
time of his service.  There is no error on his DD Form 214 relating to the
authority under which he was separated.

4.  AR 635-89 (Personnel Separations – Homosexuality) has nothing to do
with the applicant's separation.  However, when an internet search for AR
635-40A is conducted on a search engine such as "Google," this regulation
is found because it mentions AR 635-40A.

5.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 14 February 1961; therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on
13 February 1964.  The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of
limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to
show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to
timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__lds___  __phm___  __lgh___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.



                                        Linda D. Simmons
                                  ______________________
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040008051                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20040726                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |GD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |19780619                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 635-200, Chap 5                      |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |144.2400                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072764C070403

    Original file (2002072764C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. On 18 April 1962 the medical proceedings were forwarded to the separation authority, who approved the board recommendation on 24 April 1962. Section XII,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016350

    Original file (20110016350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's DD Form 214 indicates that he was separated by reason of "Physical Disability EPTS" (existed prior to service). __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015953

    Original file (20110015953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In his discharge request, the applicant acknowledged he had been informed he was considered unfit for further service based on a physical disability that was considered to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000803

    Original file (20100000803.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He adds that there was also a considerable amount of live fire training in which he was fearful of firing his weapon and having a grand mal epileptic seizure with his finger on the trigger. On 15 February 1967, the applicant was recommended for separation under Army Regulation 635-40A (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Separation or Retirement for Physical Disability) by his chain of command because of epileptic seizures. Army Regulation 635-40A, paragraph 33, in effect at the time,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106276C070208

    Original file (2004106276C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the award of the Purple Heart and the schools that he completed be reflected on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant's records contain no other evidence concerning any injuries or any medical documents, to include the medical proceedings which resulted in his placement on the TDRL and his disability discharge. These awards are reflected on his 27 September 1967 DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006249C070205

    Original file (20060006249C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequently, his shoulder was dislocated six more times. The board recommended that the applicant be separated from the military under the provisions section XII, Army Regulation 635-40B (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation). Army Regulation 635-40A, paragraph 33, states that any member of the Army who are ordered into active duty military service for a period in excess of 30 days and who are determined to be unfit by a Medical Board for retention on active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017155C070206

    Original file (20050017155C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The unit commander stated as a reason why it would not be considered feasible or appropriate to recommend elimination under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-209 was the applicant’s attitudes of complete disregard for authority and his attitudes toward life in general. On 7 December 1960, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 with issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. After review of the evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017107

    Original file (20070017107.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 March 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070017107 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states, in effect, that he served in the Army from November 1966 to January 1969 and received an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that his discharge was upgraded to a general, under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065788C070421

    Original file (2001065788C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records which shows the applicant requested a hardship discharge. There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records which shows that he served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010069

    Original file (20140010069.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel states, in effect: * he provides the background of the FSM's discharge, which resulted from a medical evaluation board (MEB) finding the FSM's medical condition of osteomyelitis (infection/inflammation of the bone or bone marrow) existed prior to service (EPTS) and was not service-aggravated * in reaching their decision, the MEB clearly violated the presumption of soundness principle found in Title 38 of U.S. Code (USC), section 1111, as interpreted in the U.S. Court of Appeals,...