Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007928C070208
Original file (20040007928C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           23 June 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040007928


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance            |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Robert L. Duecaster           |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Thomas A. Pagan               |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Michael J. Flynn              |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 30 (Military Occupational
Specialty and Number) of his separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) be
corrected.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he served as a platoon sergeant
(drill instructor) and would like this reflected on his separation
document.

3.  The applicant provides a letter from his unit commander, dated 4
December 1946, in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
that occurred on 29 January 1947.  The application submitted in this case
is dated
17 September 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for
review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records
at the
National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the
applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  This case is
being considered
using reconstructed records that primarily consist of the applicant’s
WD AGO Form 53-55.

4.  The applicant’s separation document shows that he was inducted into the
Army and entered active duty on 4 January 1946.  He served on active duty
in the continental United States for 1 year and 26 days and was honorably
separated on 29 January 1947.

5.  The applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 shows, in Item 3 (Grade) that he held
the rank of corporal (CPL) on the date of his separation and Item 38
(Highest Grade Held) shows this was the highest rank he held while service
on active duty.

6.  Item 30 (Military Occupational Specialty and Number) of the applicant’s
separation document contains the entry “Clerk General 055”, which indicates
he held this military occupational specialty (MOS) on the date of his
separation.  The applicant authenticated this document with his signature
in Item 56 (Signature of Person Being Separated).

7.  The applicant provides a copy of a letter of appreciation from his unit
commander, dated 4 December 1946.  This document indicates that applicant
had performed duties and exercised the responsibilities of a platoon
sergeant in the unit since 1 August 1946.

8.  Technical Manual 12-235, which prescribed the policy and procedure for
the preparation and distribution of separation documents during the period
in question, stated that the MOS and Number held would be entered in Item
30 of the WD AGO Form 53-55.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request to change the MOS listed on his separation
document and the support letter he provided were carefully considered.
However, while the letter provided by the applicant from his unit commander
shows he performed duties as a platoon sergeant, there is no indication
that his MOS was ever formally changed.  As a result, there is insufficient
evidence to support a change to his MOS at this late date.

2.  The regulation in effect at the time provided for entering the MOS held
in Item 30 of the WD AGO Form 53-55.  There were no provisions for entering
all MOSs in which a member preformed duties in this block.  Item 30 of the
applicant’s
WD AGO Form 53-55 confirms he held the MOS 055 (General Clerk) on the date
of his separation.  The applicant authenticated the separation document
with his signature in Item 56.  This was his verification that the
information contained on the WD AGO Form 53-55, to include the Item 30
entry, was correct at the time the document was prepared and issued.

3.  The evidence provides no indication that the applicant questioned the
MOS entry at the time of his separation, or in the more than 50 years that
have passed since he was released from active duty.  Absent any indication
that the MOS listed on the separation document was in error, or that he
would suffer some injustice if it were not changed, there is an
insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief at
this late date.  Further, the applicant may use the commander’s letter he
provided to verify his service as a platoon sergeant if that ever becomes
necessary.
4.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 29 January 1947.  Therefore, the time
for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or
injustice expired on
28 January 1950.  However, he failed to file within the 3-year statute of
limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to
show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to
timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___RLD _  __TAP__  ___MJF  _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




            ___ Robert L. Duecaster ____
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040007928                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |2005/06/23                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |HD                                      |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |1947/01/29                              |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 615-365                              |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |Demobilization                          |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Chun                                |
|ISSUES         1.       |100.0500                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002680C070206

    Original file (20050002680C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 November 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050002680 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states, in effect, he would like to be awarded the BSM based on his World War II service, and to have this award added to his separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55). The applicant’s military records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007819C070206

    Original file (20050007819C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 30 (Military Occupational Specialty and Number) of his separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) be corrected. The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge document incorrectly shows that he primarily served on active duty as a supply sergeant instead of a cannon crew member. Item 30 of the separation document contains the entry "Supply Sgt 821.” 5.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004421

    Original file (20110004421.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB) instead of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His WD AGO Form 53-55 is void of any evidence and he has not provided showing he was ever awarded an infantry MOS or performed the duties of an infantryman. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062587C070421

    Original file (2001062587C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The U. S. Total Army Personnel Command located General Orders 115, Headquarters, 70 th Infantry Division dated 29 August 1945 which awarded the applicant the BSM for heroic action on 5 January 1945. His explanation of why his WD AGO Form 53-55 shows his MOS as clerk, general, 055 instead of rifleman, 745 (the most common World War II infantry MOS) is reasonable. The applicant is also entitled to a second award of the BSM based upon his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and to award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008967C070205

    Original file (20060008967C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Although he was assigned to an infantry division, there is no evidence available which shows he was awarded an infantry MOS or served as an infantryman in the European-African-Middle Eastern Theater of Operations. It is noted that the applicant’s former Platoon Sergeant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 shows his MOS as Pioneer and award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027683

    Original file (20100027683.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show: * item 4 (Arm or Service) as Infantry instead of Quartermaster Corps * item 6 (Organization) to show "Company F, 406th Infantry" * item 31 (Military Qualifications and Date (i.e. infantry, aviation, and marksmanship badges, etc.)) Although his separation qualification record documented his service as an infantryman as well as other specialties (including being...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022534

    Original file (20110022534.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 21 of this form should show his civilian occupation as a machinist and not clerk and Item 13 should show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no orders in his available service personnel records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the following corrections of his WD AGO Form 53-55: * Item 21 - to show the civilian occupation of machinist * Item 33 - to show award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084670C070212

    Original file (2003084670C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, Item 30 (Military Occupational Specialty, or MOS) of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) be corrected to show that he was an Infantry rifleman. The evidence shows that the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 23 October 1943 and that he reported for duty on 13 November 1943. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows the following awards in Item 33 (Decoration and Citations); World...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085210C070212

    Original file (2003085210C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, through a retired infantry Colonel serving as his counsel, correction of his military records to show the Combat Infantryman Badge. Counsel requests correction of the applicant's military records to show the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant's records do not show the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Bronze Star Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069370C070402

    Original file (2002069370C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that the date of 22 October 1927 listed in Item 10 (Date Of Birth ) of his WD AGO Form 53-55 is incorrect. Item 10 (Date of Birth ) of his WD AGO Form 53-55 contains the entry 22 October 1927. The Board finds the certificate of birth provided by the applicant provides sufficient evidence to confirm his correct DOB is 27 October 1927 and not 22 October 1927, as is indicated in Item 10 of his WD AGO Form 53-55.