RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 24 May 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040006152
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Ms. Margaret V. Thompson | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. John T. Meixell . | |Member |
| |Mr. Leonard G. Hassell | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 28 (Narrative Reason for
Separation) of his 1 August 2002 separation document (DD Form 214)
be corrected to show he was separated under the provisions of the
Army National Guard Combat Reform Initiative (ANGCRI).
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he was separated under the
provisions of the ANGCRI and that his DD Form 214 should reflect this fact.
3. The applicant provides Military Personnel (MILPER) Message (MSG)
02-135 (Opening of the FY02 ANGCRI), United States Army Personnel Command
(PERSCOM) Msg 170310Z, and his DD Form 214 in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The record shows that PERSCOM announced the opening of the Fiscal Year
2002 (FY02) ANGCRI in MILPER MSG 02-135. The plan allowed for selected
Army competitive category commissioned officers on the active duty list to
volunteer for release under the FY02 ANGCRI.
2. On 17 July 2002, PERSCOM approved the applicant’s request for release
from active duty (REFRAD) under the provisions of chapter 2, Section II,
Army Regulation 600-8-24. PERSCOM directed the applicant be separated on
1 August 2002, and that he would be assigned a separation program
designator (SPD) code of MND. The PERSCOM approval msg stipulated that the
separation/transition point would ensure the DD Form 214 issued to the
applicant indicated that he was approved for separation under the
provisions of the
FY02 ANGCRI.
3. On 1 August 2002, the applicant was REFRAD after completing a total of
4 years and 7 months of active military service. The DD Form 214 he was
issued shows he held the rank of first lieutenant on the date of his
separation. Item 25 (Authority for Separation) contains an entry showing
he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-24,
Paragraph 2-5 and Item 28 lists the narrative reason for his separation as
miscellaneous/general reasons.
4. Army Regulation 600-8-24 (Officer Transfers and Discharges) provides
the policy for the separation or discharge of active duty officers.
Section II, paragraph 2-5 provides guidance on the voluntary separation for
personal reasons.
5. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities
(regulatory or directive), reasons for separating soldiers from active
duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states, in
pertinent part, that the SPD code of MND is the appropriate code to assign
to soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-24, for
miscellaneous/general reasons.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
The evidence of record confirms the PERSCOM directive that the applicant’s
DD Form 214 show he was separated under the provisions of the FY02 ANGCRI
was not complied with by the separation/transition point that prepared his
DD Form 214. Thus, it would be appropriate to grant the requested relief
in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
___MVT _ ___JTM _ ___LGH_ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
amending Item 28 of his 1 August 2002 DD Form 214 by deleting the current
entry and replacing it with the entry “Fiscal Year 2002 Army National Guard
Combat Reform Initiative”; and by providing him a corrected separation
document that includes this change.
____Margaret V. Thompson___
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20040006152 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |2005/05/24 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |HD |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |2002/08/01 |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR 600-8-24 |
|DISCHARGE REASON |FY02 ANGCRI |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. 1021 |110.0000 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050008478
The applicant states, in effect, that up until the time of his separation all officers had been receiving separation pay. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was separated under the provisions of paragraph 2-5 or 2-11, Army Regulation 600-8-24, for "Miscellaneous/General Reasons" on 29 January 2000. Notwithstanding the Interim Change to the DoDFMR provided by the applicant, the evidence confirms that the applicant was not authorized separation pay at the time of his release from...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01691
Available documentation in the applicant’s records indicated that on 22 Jul 04, he requested to be separated from active duty on 1 Jan 05 according to AFI 36-3208, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.14. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPR evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 24 Jun 05 for review and response. As of this...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02861
The Separation Code he received is, in fact, the code authorized for the type of early separation he requested. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083382C070212
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: Separation pay. Army Regulation 600-8-24 provides for the discharge or release of officers on active duty.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02785
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his SPD code. According to the Military Personnel Flight Memorandum 04-35, the SPD code for individuals being released under the LADSC Waiver Program will be “MND” and the narrative reason will be “miscellaneous/general reasons.” The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00321
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00321 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show his Separation Program Designator (SPD) code as one that reflects a separation under the Palace Chase program instead of “MND”, “Miscellaneous/General...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01866
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01866 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 DECEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code of "MND" and narrative reason for separating be changed so he can receive his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits. The specific authority through which he...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01317
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 01317 INDEX CODE: 100.06, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 OCTOBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from “3A” to “1” to permit reentry into the military without a waiver. On 15 Jan 05, applicant was honorably released from...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019295
The evidence of record shows that the separation approving authority directed that the applicant be released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 2-21, AR 600-8-24, Section X, by reason of Declination of Regular Army Integration and Promotion. The board found that the overall length and quality of the applicants service and his post service accomplishments to include his combat service (i.e., his service in Iraq and Afghanistan) merited a change to the applicants narrative...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02405
The applicant did not submit evidence or identify any errors or injustices and the narrative reason for separation is correct. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 28 November 2006 under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Ms. Cathlynn B. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 25 Aug 06.