Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005603C070208
Original file (20040005603C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        28 September 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040005603


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Victoria A. Donaldson        |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Fred Eichorn                  |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher             |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Ronald E. Blakely             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that her National Guard Federal
Recognition order (initial appointment), dated 25 March 2004, in the grade
of second lieutenant be corrected to show the Federal Recognition order
effective date of 19 September 2002.

2.  The applicant states she was initially appointed as a second lieutenant
on 19 September 2002 in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG) and
tendered temporary Federal Recognition.  The applicant continues that she
did not receive permanent Federal Recognition within six months due to
administrative errors.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of the current NGB Form 89 (Proceedings
of a Federal Recognition Examining Board); the initial NGB 89; an Oath of
Office, dated 28 February 2004; an Oath of Office, dated 19 September 2002;
and National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 74 AR, dated
25 March 2004.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 19 September 2002, a Federal Recognition Board was held by the
PAARNG to determine if the applicant was qualified to be awarded Federal
Recognition.  The proceedings indicated that the applicant was satisfactory
in her physical qualifications, moral character and general qualifications.


2.  There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal
Recognition by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the
19 September 2002 PAARNG Federal Recognition Board.

3.  The applicant accepted an appointment as a second lieutenant in the
PAARNG on 19 September 2002.

4.  On 19 September 2002, the applicant executed an Oath of Office as a
second lieutenant in the PAARNG and was granted temporary Federal
Recognition.

5.  There is no evidence that the applicant received permanent Federal
Recognition as a second lieutenant from the National Guard Bureau within
the six month period required by National Guard/Army regulations.  As a
result her temporary Federal Recognition expired.

6.  On 12 February 2004, a second Federal Recognition Board was held by the
PAARNG to determine if the applicant was qualified to be awarded Federal
Recognition.  The proceedings indicated that the applicant was satisfactory
in her physical qualifications, moral character and general qualifications.


7.  On 28 February 2004, the applicant executed a second Oath of Office as
a second lieutenant in the PAARNG and was granted temporary Federal
Recognition.

8.  National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 74 AR, dated
25 March 2004, awarded the applicant permanent Federal Recognition for
initial appointment to the grade of second lieutenant, effective 28
February 2004.

9.  National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officer-Federal
Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for
processing all applications for Federal Recognition.  Paragraph 2-1 states
that commissioned officers of the ARNG are appointed by the several States
under Article 1, Section 8 of the U. S. Constitution.  These appointments
may be federally recognized by the Chief, NGB under such regulations as the
Secretary of the Army may prescribe and under the provisions of this
regulation.  Officers who are federally recognized in a particular grade
and branch shall be tendered an appointment in the same grade as Reserve
commissioned officers of the Army with assignment to the Army National
Guard of the United States if they have not already accepted such
appointment.

10.  National Guard Regulation 600-100, paragraph 2-2 states that the
effective date of Federal Recognition for original appointment is that date
on which the commissioned officer executes the oath of office in the State.
 Paragraph 2-3a states that temporary Federal Recognition upon initial
appointment establishes the authorized grade to be used by all officers in
their federally recognized status.

11.  National Guard Regulation 600-100, paragraph 2-13 states that
temporary Federal Recognition may be extended to an officer who has been
appointed in the ARNG of a State and found to be qualified by an Federal
Recognition Board pending final determination of eligibility and
appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army.  If not sooner
withdrawn or replaced by the granting of permanent Federal Recognition,
temporary Federal Recognition will automatically terminate six months after
the effective date of State appointment.  However, should the initial
period of temporary Federal Recognition expire due to administrative
processing delays, through no fault of the member, a subsequent Federal
Recognition Board should be convened to consider the request again and
grant another new period of temporary Federal Recognition if warranted.
12.  National Guard Regulation 600-100, paragraph 10-15b states that
temporary Federal Recognition may be granted by an Federal Recognition
Board to those eligible when the board finds that the member has
successfully passed the examination prescribed herein, has subscribed to
the oath of office, and has been appointed by a State order for assignment
to a position vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the ARNG.  The
Federal Recognition Board will forward the NGB Form 89 and allied documents
to The Adjutant General.  When the member is favorably recommended, The
Adjutant General will endorse the packet to the NGB.  If the member meets
the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB
extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch
in which the member is qualified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal
Recognition effective 19 September 2002 upon her initial appointment in the
PAARNG as a second lieutenant.  At that time, her Federal Recognition
packet and allied documents should have been forwarded to the Adjutant
General of the State of Pennsylvania for endorsement to the National Guard
Bureau for extension of permanent Federal Recognition.  Through no fault of
the applicant, this action was not taken.

2.  Subsequently, the applicant's Federal Recognition packet was considered
by another PAARNG Federal Recognition Board.

3.  Based on the recommendations of the second PAARNG Federal Recognition
Board, the National Guard Bureau issued orders awarding the applicant
permanent Federal Recognition effective 28 February 2004.

4.  From the foregoing, it is clear that an administrative error denied the
applicant Federal Recognition effective 19 September 2002.

5.  Based on applicable law and regulation, the applicant is entitled to
have Federal Recognition Order Number 74 AR amended to show the effective
date of permanent Federal Recognition in the grade of second lieutenant is
19 September 2002.

6.  Upon correction of the date of Federal Recognition for initial
appointment as a second lieutenant, the applicant's eligibility date for
promotion and Federal Recognition to first lieutenant should be adjusted
accordingly.


BOARD VOTE:

__FE ___  __KYF __  __REB __  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends
that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected by amending Federal Recognition Order Number 74 AR to show that
she was extended Federal Recognition effective 19 September 2002 in the
grade of second lieutenant.

2.  The Board further determined that if  Federal  Recognition  Orders  have
been published promoting the individual concerned to first lieutenant  prior
to the date of this Record of  Proceedings,  then  those  orders  should  be
amended  to  show  an  effective  date  of  promotion  to  first  lieutenant
consistent with the corrected initial appointment  and  Federal  Recognition
as a second lieutenant.







                                        __Mr. Fred Eichorn __
                                            CHAIRPERSON





                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040005603                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |28 Oct 04                               |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |grant                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |125.0200.0000                           |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011196

    Original file (20090011196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he was initially appointed as a second lieutenant on 27 August 2007 in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG) and that he never received permanent Federal recognition. There is no evidence that the applicant received permanent Federal recognition as a second lieutenant from the NGB within the 6-month period required by National Guard regulations. Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 27 August 2007 upon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010002

    Original file (20080010002.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show that he received permanent Federal recognition for initial appointment as a second lieutenant in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard National (PAARNG) on 29 September 2005. There is no evidence that the applicant received permanent Federal recognition as a second lieutenant from the National Guard Bureau within the six month period required by National Guard/Army regulations. However, should the initial period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011198

    Original file (20090011198.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show that he received permanent Federal recognition for initial appointment as a second lieutenant in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard National (PAARNG) on 11 August 2007. The applicant states, in effect, that he did not receive Federal recognition for his initial appointment as a second lieutenant in a timely manner thus delaying his promotion to first lieutenant. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004378C070206

    Original file (20050004378C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of the current NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board); the initial NGB Form 89; an Oath of Office, dated 16 December 2003; an Oath of Office, dated 9 August 2002; and National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 38 AR, dated 19 February 2004. Paragraph 2-3a states that temporary Federal Recognition upon initial appointment establishes the authorized grade to be used by all officers in their federally recognized status. If...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017832

    Original file (20090017832.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he received permanent Federal recognition for initial appointment as a first lieutenant in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard National (PAARNG) on 30 January 2008 (this date was changed from 28 December 2007 based upon his response to the advisory opinion). However, should the initial period of temporary Federal recognition expire due to administrative processing delays through no fault of the member, a subsequent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000158C070208

    Original file (20040000158C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal Recognition by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the 13 April 2002 IAARNG Federal Recognition Board. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified. Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal Recognition effective 13 May 2002 upon...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008874C070208

    Original file (20040008874C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her National Guard Federal Recognition order (initial appointment), dated 20 May 2002, in the grade of second lieutenant be corrected to show the effective date of 19 May 2000. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the MTARNG held a Federal Recognition Board to determine if the applicant was qualified to be awarded Federal Recognition. National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 333 AR, dated 4 December 2002, awarded the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005609C070208

    Original file (20040005609C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal Recognition by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the 21 June 2002 MAARNG Federal Recognition Board. However, should the initial period of temporary Federal Recognition expire due to administrative processing delays, through no fault of the member, a subsequent Federal Recognition Board should be convened to consider the request again and grant another new period of temporary Federal Recognition if...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011206

    Original file (20090011206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    National Guard Regulation 600-100, paragraph 2-2, states that the effective date of Federal recognition for original appointment is that date on which the commissioned officer executes the oaths of office in the State. Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 11 August 2007 upon his initial appointment in the PAARNG as a 2LT. Subsequently, the applicant's Federal recognition packet was considered by another PAARNG Federal recognition board and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011195

    Original file (20090011195.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he was extended Federal recognition for initial appointment as a 2LT on 11 August 2007 and promotion to 1LT on 11 February 2009. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition,...