RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 20 July 2004
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040002848
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mrs. Victoria A. Donaldson | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Kenneth W. Lapin | |Member |
| |Mr. Antonio Uribe | |Member |
The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his National Guard Federal
Recognition order (initial appointment), dated 12 December 2003, in the
grade of second lieutenant be corrected to show the Federal Recognition
order effective date of 9 October 2002.
2. The applicant states he was initially appointed as a second lieutenant
on 17 May 2002 in the Ohio Army National Guard (OHARNG) and that he never
received permanent Federal Recognition.
3. The applicant provides a copy of the current NGB Form 89 (Proceedings
of a Federal Recognition Examining Board); the initial NGB 89; an Oath of
Office, dated 21 November 2003; an Oath of Office, dated 9 October 2002;
and National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 314 AR, dated
12 December 2003.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. On 9 October 2002, a Federal Recognition Board was held by the OHARNG
to determine if the applicant was qualified to be awarded Federal
Recognition. The proceedings indicated that the applicant was satisfactory
in his physical qualifications, moral character and general qualifications.
2. There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal
Recognition by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the 9
October 2002 OHARNG Federal Recognition Board.
3. The applicant accepted an appointment as a second lieutenant in the
OHARNG on 9 October 2002.
4. On 9 October 2002, the applicant executed an Oath of Office as a second
lieutenant in the OHARNG and was granted temporary Federal Recognition.
5. There is no evidence that the applicant received permanent Federal
Recognition as a second lieutenant from the National Guard Bureau within
the six month period required by National Guard/Army regulations. As a
result his temporary Federal Recognition expired.
6. On 21 November 2003, a second Federal Recognition Board was held by the
OHARNG to determine if the applicant was qualified to be awarded Federal
Recognition. The proceedings indicated that the applicant was satisfactory
in his physical qualifications, moral character and general qualifications.
7. On 21 November 2003, the applicant executed a second Oath of Office as
a second lieutenant in the OHARNG and was granted temporary Federal
Recognition.
8. National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 314 AR awarded
the applicant permanent Federal Recognition for initial appointment to the
grade of second lieutenant, effective 21 November 2003.
9. National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officer-Federal
Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for
processing all applications for Federal Recognition. Paragraph 2-1 states
that commissioned officers of the ARNG are appointed by the several States
under Article 1, Section 8 of the U. S. Constitution. These appointments
may be federally recognized by the Chief, NGB under such regulations as the
Secretary of the Army may prescribe and under the provisions of this
regulation. Officers who are federally recognized in a particular grade
and branch shall be tendered an appointment in the same grade as Reserve
commissioned officers of the Army with assignment to the Army National
Guard of the United States if they have not already accepted such
appointment.
10. National Guard Regulation 600-100, paragraph 2-2 states that the
effective date of Federal Recognition for original appointment is that date
on which the commissioned officer executes the oath of office in the State.
Paragraph 2-3a states that temporary Federal Recognition upon initial
appointment establishes the authorized grade to be used by all officers in
their federally recognized status.
11. National Guard Regulation 600-100, paragraph 2-13 states that
temporary Federal Recognition may be extended to an officer who has been
appointed in the ARNG of a State and found to be qualified by an Federal
Recognition Board pending final determination of eligibility and
appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army. If not sooner
withdrawn or replaced by the granting of permanent Federal Recognition,
temporary Federal Recognition will automatically terminate six months after
the effective date of State appointment. However, should the initial
period of temporary Federal Recognition expire due to administrative
processing delays, through no fault of the member, a subsequent Federal
Recognition Board should be convened to consider the request again and
grant another new period of temporary Federal Recognition if warranted.
12. National Guard Regulation 600-100, paragraph 10-15b states that
temporary Federal Recognition may be granted by an Federal Recognition
Board to those eligible when the board finds that the member has
successfully passed the examination prescribed herein, has subscribed to
the oath of office, and has been appointed by a State order for assignment
to a position vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the ARNG. The
Federal Recognition Board will forward the NGB Form 89 and allied documents
to The Adjutant General. When the member is favorably recommended, The
Adjutant General will endorse the packet to the NGB. If the member meets
the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB
extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch
in which the member is qualified.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal
Recognition effective 9 October 2002 upon his initial appointment in the
OHARNG as a second lieutenant. At that time, his Federal Recognition
packet and allied documents should have been forwarded to the Adjutant
General of the State of Ohio for endorsement to the National Guard Bureau
for extension of permanent Federal Recognition. Through no fault of the
applicant, this action was not taken.
2. Subsequently, the applicant's Federal Recognition packet was considered
by another OHARNG Federal Recognition Board.
3. Based on the recommendations of the second OHARNG Federal Recognition
Board, the National Guard Bureau issued orders awarding the applicant
permanent Federal Recognition effective 21 November 2003.
4. From the foregoing, it is clear that an administrative error denied the
applicant Federal Recognition effective 9 October 2002.
5. Based on applicable law and regulation, the applicant is entitled to
have Federal Recognition Order Number 314 AR amended to show the effective
date of permanent Federal Recognition in the grade of second lieutenant is
9 October 2002.
BOARD VOTE:
_FE_____ _AU_____ _KL____ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by
amending Federal Recognition Order Number 314 AR to show that he was
extended Federal Recognition effective 9 October 2002 in the grade of
second lieutenant.
__Fred N. Eichorn____
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20040002848 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |2004/07/20 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY |Mr. Schneider |
|ISSUES 1. |125.0200.0000 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008605
The applicant did not receive permanent Federal Recognition as a second lieutenant from the National Guard Bureau within the six month period required by National Guard/Army regulations based on the fact that he did not provide an original social security card with his Federal Recognition packet. National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 149 AR, dated 26 June 2007, awarded the applicant permanent Federal Recognition for initial appointment to the grade of second lieutenant,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004709C070205
However, should the initial period of temporary Federal Recognition expire due to administrative processing delays, through no fault of the member, a subsequent Federal Recognition Board should be convened to consider the request again and grant another new period of temporary Federal Recognition if warranted. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014136
On 14 January 2008, National Guard Bureau, Washington, D.C. published Federal Recognition Orders Number 9 AR, extending the applicant permanent Federal recognition for initial appointment as a 2LT in the OHARNG, effective 16 July 2007. The Chief, Personnel Division, National Guard Bureau, recommended approval of the applicant's request to adjust her initial date of appointment from 16 July 2007 to 17 July 2006 (erroneously shown in the advisory opinion memorandum as 17 July 2006 to 16 July...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000190C070208
There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal Recognition by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the 18 July 2002 LAARNG Federal Recognition Board. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified. Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal Recognition effective 25 August 2002...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000152C070208
There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal Recognition by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the 22 October 2002 FLARNG Federal Recognition Board. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified. Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal Recognition effective 2 November 2002...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004377C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that his National Guard Federal Recognition order (initial appointment), dated 22 October 2003, in the grade of second lieutenant be corrected to show the effective date 11 August 2002. The applicant provides a copy of the current NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board); the initial NGB Form 89; an Oath of Office, dated 16 October 2003; an Oath of Office, dated 11 August 2002; and National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000208C070208
There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal Recognition by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the 9 August 2002 IAARNG Federal Recognition Board. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified. Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal Recognition effective 12 August 2002...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000235C070208
There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal Recognition by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the 9 August 2002 IAARNG Federal Recognition Board. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified. Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal Recognition effective 12 August 2002...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004000276C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that his Louisiana Army National Guard (LAARNG) Federal Recognition order be corrected to show the effective date of 25 August 2002. The applicant states he was initially appointed as a second lieutenant on 25 August 2002 and that his initial Federal Recognition packet was never processed by the National Guard Bureau (NGB). If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002000277C070215
The applicant requests, in effect, that his Louisiana Army National Guard (LAARNG) Federal Recognition order be corrected to show the effective date of 25 August 2002. Paragraph 2-3a states that temporary Federal Recognition upon initial appointment establishes the authorized grade to be used by all officers in their federally recognized status. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition to the...