Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001458C070208
Original file (20040001458C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        24 FEBRUARY 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040001458


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms, Deborah L. Brantley           |     |Senior Analyst       |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Ms. Yolanda Maldonado             |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Ronald Weaver                 |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Jonathon Rost                 |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his 25 June 2004 separation document be
corrected to reflect award of two Purple Hearts, the Army Commendation
Medal, Army Achievement Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Expert
Infantryman Badge.  He also asks that completion of a 40 hour Javelin
Gunner’s Course be entered in item 14 (military education) and that item
15a be corrected to show that he contributed to education assistance
benefits.

2.  The applicant states the above items and information were omitted from
his separation document.

3.  The applicant provides copies of orders confirming entitlement to the
awards in question, a copy of his completion certificate for the Javelin
Gunners Course, and evidence that he contributed to the Montgomery GI Bill.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant entered
active duty on 26 June 2001.  Orders provided by the applicant confirm that
he was awarded the following:

      a.  two awards of the Army Commendation Medal

      b.  one award of the Army Achievement Medal

      c.  a Combat Infantryman Badge

      d.  the Expert Infantryman Badge

      e.  the Army Good Conduct Medal

2.  With the exception of his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, which
was awarded by Task Force Falcon in Iraq in May 2003, all of his other
awards were confirmed in orders issued at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.  All
the awards, however, were omitted from his separation document.

3.  Evidence available to the Board indicates that the applicant was
wounded as a result of hostile action on 25 June 2003.  He provides two
sets of orders awarding him the Purple Heart for the 25 June 2003 wound.
One order was published on 8 May 2003 by the Combined Joint Task Force
Seven in Iraq and the other was published by the then United States Total
Army Personnel Command on 7 July 2003.

4.  In an advisory opinion from the United States Army Human Resources
Command, formerly known as the United States Total Army Personnel Command,
it was noted that the applicant is entitled to only one award of the Purple
Heart.  The opinion noted that orders published by the Total Army Personnel
Command in July 2003 superseded “any previously issued order that may have
been published announcing this award.”  The applicant was provided an
opportunity to comment on the advisory opinion but did not respond.

5.  The applicant’s file does contain a copy of a course completion
certificate for the Javelin Gunner’s Course completed at Fort Bragg, North
Carolina.  Information from the Army’s School Catalog indicates that the
Javelin Gunner’s Course teaches the unit medium range anti-armor weapons
specialist the basics of the Javelin Weapon System, prepare for firing,
restore to a carry configuration, carry techniques, infrared principles,
target engagement procedures, target engageability, warning indicators and
malfunctions procedures, as well as field tactical training operations and
maintenance.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 establishes the policies and procedures for
completion and distribution of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part it
states that item 14 (military education) will list formal in service
training courses successfully completed during the period of service
covered by title, length in weeks, and month and year completed.  This
information is to assist the soldier after separation in job placement and
counseling; therefore, training courses for combat skills are not listed.

7.  Documents provided by the applicant confirm that he contributed to the
Montgomery GI Bill Program.  Item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam
Era Veteran’s Educational Assistance Program) (VEAP) on his separation
document is checked “no.”

8.  The VEAP was an educational incentive program offered to individuals
who enlisted between 1 January 1977 and 30 June 1985.  The program was
designed for the post-Vietnam era soldier as a means of establishing a fund
to support their educational objectives following their military service.
For every dollar contributed by a soldier, the government matched with a
two dollar contribution to the individual's VEAP account.  Participation in
the VEAP was a voluntary option and was replaced, in July 1985, by the
Montgomery GI Bill and the Army College Fund Program.  The Army College
Fund Program, another voluntary option, enabled a soldier to contribute
$100.00 per month for the first year of their enlistment and recoup up to
$14,000.00 in educational benefits depending on the length of their
enlistment contract.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence available to the Board confirms that the applicant was awarded
two Army Commendation Medals, an Army Achievement Medal, the Combat
Infantryman Badge, the Expert Infantryman Badge, and an Army Good Conduct
Medal.  His records should be corrected accordingly.

2.  The evidence also confirms that the applicant was wounded on 25 June
2003 and awarded the Purple Heart.  It is unclear why the applicant has two
orders confirming award of the Purple Heart for his 25 June 2003 wound,
however, the information provided by the United States Army Human Resources
Command confirms that the orders issued in July 2003 superceded the orders
issued by the Combined Joint Task Force Seven in Iraq.  As such, the
applicant is entitled to only one award of the Purple Heart and that award
should be added to his separation document.

3.  The applicant did completed the Javelin Gunner’s Course.  However,
because that course enhances combat related skills only, it is not recorded
on the separation document.

4.  Although the applicant may have contributed to the Montgomery GI Bill
Program, item 15a on his separation document is intended to reflect
participation in the VEAP.  The VEAP was disbanded well before the
applicant entered active duty and as such, the “no” entry is appropriate.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

___YM __  ___RW  _  __JR ___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION





BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board
recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual
concerned be corrected:

      a.  by showing that he is entitled to one Purple Heart for wounds
sustained on 25 June 2003; and


      b.  by showing that he was awarded two Army Commendation Medals, an
Army Achievement Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Expert
Infantryman Badge, and an Army Good Conduct Medal.


2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to:

      a.  award of a second Purple Heart;


      b.  completion of the Javelin Gunner’s Course; and


      c.  participation in the VEAP.




                                  ___ Yolanda Maldonado_____
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040001458                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050224                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |PARTIAL GRANT                           |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |107,00                                  |
|2.                      |110.00                                  |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001132

    Original file (20070001132.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program (VEAP)) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show “Yes” instead of “No;” and that item 17 (Member Was Provided Complete Dental Examination and All Appropriate Dental Services and Treatment Within 90 Days Prior to Separation) be corrected to show “No” instead of “Yes.” 2. For any Soldier who enlisted after 1985, mark "NO"...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004430

    Original file (20090004430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veteran's Educational Assistance Program (VEAP)) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show "Yes" instead of "No." The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 14 April 2003, in support of his request. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he contributed to the VEAP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009975

    Original file (20100009975.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The official stated that a Soldier would only be assigned to a recruiting battalion following completion of the Army Recruiter Course. While there are no available documents showing he completed the Airborne Course, his DD Form 214 shows he has an SQI of "P" indicating he completed the course. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000427C070206

    Original file (20050000427C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her 2001 separation document be corrected to reflect that she participated in the VEAP (Veteran's Educational Assistance Program), that she is entitled to a second award of the National Defense Service Medal and any other awards authorized for active duty Soldiers. The evidence also confirms that the applicant was on active duty on 11 September 2001 as is therefore entitled to a second award of the National Defense Service Medal. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020850

    Original file (20100020850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and his contributions to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). With respect to an entry regarding the MGIB on the DD Form 214, there is no provision in the regulation that governs the DD Form 214 to annotate an entry regarding the MGIB on this form.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016737

    Original file (20090016737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Paragraph 2-4 (Completing the DD Form 214) of the separation documents regulation, contains item-by-item instructions for completing the DD Form 214. However, the DD Form 214 in use at the time of the applicant’s separation from active duty is not designed to show an individual’s contribution to the MGIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015494

    Original file (20110015494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 January 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110015494 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) at item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP)) be changed from no to yes. VEAP is for those who first entered active duty during the period 1 January 1977 through 30 June 1985, and who made a contribution to a VEAP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014397

    Original file (20080014397.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of his application: a. DD Form 214, dated 30 July 2008; b. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was promoted to CPT with an effective date and a date of rank as 1 April 2007 which is incorrectly shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the correct effective date of pay grade. The evidence of record shows that the applicant contributed to the MGIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017509

    Original file (20060017509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 31 December 2003, that shows he was honorably retired from active duty after completing a total of 20 years and 19 days active service. The evidence of record shows that the applicant enrolled in the “New GI Bill” (i.e., the MGIB) on 3 March 1997. The DD Form 214 in use at the time of the applicant’s retirement from active duty is not designed to show an individual’s contribution to the MGIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021736

    Original file (20100021736.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show any awards and decorations and that he contributed to the MGIB. This form also shows in: a. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.