Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000473C070208
Original file (20040000473C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:           6 January 2005
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20040000473


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mrs. Nancy L. Amos                |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. Fred N. Eichorn               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Richard T. Dunbar             |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Yolanda Maldonado             |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan
(RCSBP) election be changed from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage.

2.  The applicant states that he has always wanted his former spouse to
receive the SBP.

3.  The applicant provides a Retiree Account Statement; the first page of
his DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel); orders
transferring him to the Retired Reserve; orders placing him on the Retired
List; and a letter from the U. S. Army Reserve Personnel Command dated 10
August 2002.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which
occurred on    12 December 1995.  The application submitted in this case is
dated 19 April 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The applicant was born on 23 August 1942.  After having had prior
service, he enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve in 1966.  His notification
of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is not
available; however, records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service
(DFAS) indicate he elected to participate in the RCSBP for spouse only
coverage, option C.  DFAS was also able to provide the second page of a DD
Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) showing he made that
election on 12 August 1988.

4.  On 21 December 2004, the applicant informed the Board analyst that he
divorced on 12 December 1994, that he has not remarried, and again
reiterated that he always intended his former spouse to receive the SBP.

5.  On 1 July 2002, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656.  On that form,
he indicated that he had no spouse, that he designated his former spouse to
be his beneficiary for his unpaid retired pay, and that he elected spouse
only SBP coverage.  Former spouse coverage was one of the options available
on the DD Form 2656.

6.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way
for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60,
to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching
age 60.  Three options are available:  (A)  elect to decline enrollment and
choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B)  elect that a
beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment
of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C)  elect that a
beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age
60.  Elections are made by category, not by name.  Once a member elects
either options B or C in any category of coverage, that election is
irrevocable.  Option B and C participants do not make a new SBP election at
age 60.  They cannot cancel SBP participation or change options they had in
RCSBP – it automatically rolls into SBP coverage.

7.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act
(USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP coverage for former
spouses of retiring members.

8.  Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse
coverage for retired members (Reservists, too).

9.  Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to
order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where
the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had
not yet made an SBP election.

10.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions
of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  Section 1448(b)(3)(A) permits a person
who is a participant in the SBP and is providing coverage for a spouse or a
spouse and child and who has a spouse who was not that person's former
spouse when that person become eligible to participate in the SBP to elect
to provide an annuity to that former spouse.  Any such election must be
written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the
Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of
divorce.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant elected to participate in the RCSBP when he received his
    20-year letter in 1988.  He divorced in December 1994.  Although his
divorce decree is not available and it cannot be determined if the court
ordered him to provide the SBP for his former spouse, he stated that it was
always his intention to provide the SBP for his former spouse.  However, he
failed to make a written request to change his RCSBP election within one
year of the date of his divorce as required by law.

2.  Nevertheless, the applicant stated that he has never remarried and the
evidence shows he has paid SBP premiums since he turned age 60.  It would
be equitable to correct his records to show he requested, in writing and
within one year of his divorce, to change his RCSBP election to former
spouse coverage, option C.

BOARD VOTE:

__fne___  __rtd___  __ym____  GRANT RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by showing that he made a written request
to change his RCSBP coverage to former spouse coverage, option C, on 1
January 1995 and that his request was received and processed by the
appropriate office in a timely manner.




            ___Fred N. Eichorn____
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20040000473                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20050106                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |Mr. Schneider                           |
|ISSUES         1.       |137.04                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087638C070212

    Original file (2003087638C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his divorce decree did not award the SBP to his former spouse; however, a community property settlement has since ordered her to receive the SBP. A DD Form 2656-1 (Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage) dated 5 March 2003 indicates that the applicant had not remarried as of that date, that he elected to change his RCSBP coverage to former spouse coverage with 20 percent supplemental coverage, and that the election was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002800

    Original file (20090002800.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090002800 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000098C070208

    Original file (20040000098C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for former spouse coverage when he retired at age 60. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or had not yet made an SBP election. The applicant divorced in 1988.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005404

    Original file (20120005404.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of his divorce. It also stated that "by law" upon receipt of this letter, a qualified Reserve Component member, who was married, would automatically be enrolled in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) under Option C, Spouse and Child(ren) coverage based on Full Retired Pay, unless spouse concurrence was provided to allow...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057137C070420

    Original file (2001057137C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The applicant originally elected RCSBP coverage in the category of spouse and child. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant requested a change to his RCSBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004491

    Original file (20140004491.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests in effect correction of her former husband's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The FSM and applicant were divorced on 26 September 2012. Unfortunately, there is no evidence the FSM changed his SBP coverage to "former spouse" coverage or the applicant deemed the election within one year of her divorce.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005974

    Original file (20110005974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of his divorce. The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage pursuant to his divorce decree. He did not submit a change in SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage within 1 year of his divorce.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009530C070208

    Original file (20040009530C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be changed to show former spouse coverage. The FSM and the applicant were divorced on 21 September 2000. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | 20060002994

    Original file (20060002994.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's earlier request to correct the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election to former spouse coverage. Counsel states that the previous Board stated: "Absent consent of the widow to correct the FSM's records to provide for former spouse coverage in lieu of spouse coverage, to grant the applicant's request at this date would constitute...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023390

    Original file (20110023390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Orders 343-072 (Retired Reserve) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 23B (Army National Guard (ARNG) Retirement Points History Statement) * Letters from her divorce attorney * Superior Court of the State of New York, County of Orange, Court Order – Acceptance for Processing and Amended Court Order – Acceptable for Processing * Correspondence with and from DFAS * DD Form 2656-10 (SBP/RCSBP Request for Deemed Election) * Copies of certified mail receipts * Letter from...