RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 1 February 2005
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040000204
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | |Director |
| |Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr. | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Walter T. Morrison | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. John T. Meixell | |Member |
| |Mr. William D. Powers | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart and the
Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).
2. The applicant states that he was shot during hostile action in April
1969, evacuated to the hospital ships Repose and Sanctuary and then
transferred to Headquarters, Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (HQ,MACV)
where he became an instructor to the Vietnamese. They were told, in the
field, that after any action they were authorized to wear the CIB. In his
case, the paperwork seems to have never caught up to him. He is currently
being treated for metastasized malignant melanoma and has filed an Agent
Orange claim. He knew that the awards were not in his record but really
did not care until faced with his own mortality.
3. The applicant provides no supporting documents.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged injustice which
occurred on 4 January 1970. The application submitted in this case is
dated 25 March 2004.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant enlisted on 27 May 1968, completed training as a light
weapons infantryman, received military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B10
and was posted to Vietnam. He served as a rifleman with D company, 1st
Battalion (Airmobile), 506th Infantry from 20 December 1968 to 21 May 1969
when he was transferred, as a rifleman, to HQ, MACV. He returned to the
United States on 3 January 1970 and was separated early as an overseas
returnee.
4. There are no award orders in the available records.
5. His DD Form 214, (Report of Transfer or Discharge) lists his authorized
awards as the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal,
the Vietnam Campaign Medal and the Army Commendation Medal.
6. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was
advanced to specialist four (E-4), on 18 April 1969 while with D Company,
1st Battalion, 506th Infantry. His awards are shown in item 41 as the
Vietnam Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Army Commendation
Medal awarded by HQ MACV General Order Number 7267, and "SS Bad w Bar" and
the "MM Badge w/Bar." Item 39 (Campaigns) credits him with one unnamed
campaign and item 40 (Wounds) is blank. Item 38 (Record of Assignments)
shows that his conduct and efficiency evaluations were exclusively
excellent throughout his period of active duty service.
7. In the medical history that the applicant provided for his separation
physical examination the applicant indicated that he had been hospitalized
on "Hospital ship sanctuary, military doctors, Ear trouble and nerves in
right small finger were severed." The examining physician noted the
hearing problem and referred the applicant to the local ENT [Ear Nose and
Throat] clinic without other comment.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, that the Purple Heart is awarded for
a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of
hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the
wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required
treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been
made a matter of official record.
9. The regulation also provides that the CIB is awarded to infantry
officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry
MOS. They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or
attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size. The
Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (formerly known as
the Total Army Personnel Command) has advised, in similar cases, that
during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who
held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Good Conduct Medal is
awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct,
efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted
service. This period
is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends
with the termination of a period of Federal military service. A record of
punishment is not automatically disqualifying. At that time, a single
conduct or efficiency rating of
less than excellent was disqualifying; although, a “Good” academic mark in
a service school was not disqualifying. Although there is no automatic
entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.
Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of
unfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond. At that
time, disqualification was normally noted on the DA Form 20.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also authorizes a bronze service star, based
on qualifying service, for each designated campaign listed in Appendix B of
the regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn
on the appropriate campaign or service medal. A silver service star is
authorized in lieu of five bronze service stars. Appendix B lists the
designated campaign
periods for which a bronze service star is authorized for wear on the
Vietnam Service Medal. The applicant served during the following four
designated campaign periods: Counteroffensive Phase VI, 2 November 1968 –
22 February 1969; Tet 69 Counteroffensive, 23 February 1969 – 8 June 1969;
Vietnam Summer Fall 1969, 9 June 1969 – 31 October 1969; Vietnam Winter
Spring 1970; 1 November 1969 – 30 April 1970.
12. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Credit Register) shows
that, during the applicant's tenure the 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry was
awarded the Presidential Unit Citation for the period 10 –21 May 1969, the
Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge and
the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation Badge.
13. Searches of the historical files of the applicant's units and the deck
logs of the USS Repose and USS Sanctuary were searched at the National
Archives College Park, Maryland failed to produce any substantiating
evidence to show that the applicant is entitled to the Purple Heart or was
awarded the CIB.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Unfortunately there is insufficient substantiating evidence to show
that the applicant was treated for a wound sustained while in action
against an enemy or as a result of hostile action, which would make him
eligible for an award of the Purple Heart.
2. He was an infantryman serving in an infantry battalion for 6 months
during which it was awarded a Presidential Unit Citation. It is reasonable
to conclude that he served in active ground combat, especially given that
he was promoted to pay grade E-4 and transferred to MACV headquarters.
Generally, Soldiers in Vietnam earned transfer out of the field. He should
be awarded the CIB.
3. The applicant distinguished himself by his conduct, efficiency and
fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service as
evidenced by his exclusively excellent conduct and efficiency ratings, his
advancement to pay grade E-4 and the award of the Army Commendation Medal.
He should be awarded the Good Conduct Medal.
4. Item 41 of the applicant's DA Form 20 confirms the award of the Army
Commendation as shown on his DD Form 214. Otherwise, it is remarkably
incomplete [it does not even list the National Defense Service Medal]. The
qualification badge entries fail to specify what weapon bar was authorized.
It can be concluded; however, that the first entry is for the service
rifle since that is always the first weapon with which every Soldier
qualifies. The applicant's record should show that he was awarded the
Sharpshooter Badge with Rifle Bar.
5. The applicant served during four designated campaign periods and is
authorized to wear four bronze service stars on the Vietnam Service Medal.
6. His infantry unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation, the
Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge and
the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation Badge. He is
authorized these awards.
7. The above authorized awards should be shown on the applicant's DD
Form 214.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
__JTM___ __WTM_ __WDP__ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely
file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army
records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Good Conduct
Medal and;
b. showing on his DD Form 214 that his authorized awards include the
Army Commendation Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam
Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the Vietnam Campaign Medal
with "1960" device the Presidential Unit Citation, the RVN Gallantry Cross
with Palm Unit Citation Badge, the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First
Class Unit Citation Badge, the Combat Infantryman Badge and the
Sharpshooter Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.
2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is
insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result,
the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to
award of the Purple Heart.
Walter T. Morrison__________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20040000204 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20050201 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION | |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |107.00 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002171C070208
Antonio Uribe | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge and Army Good Conduct Medal; by adding the Air Medal he earned to his record; by...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018796
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080018796 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 30 October 1967 through 7 July 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 22 May 1968; b. awarding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019253
Therefore, he should be awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 3 January 1968 to 14 December 1969 and this award should be added to his DD Form 214. Accordingly, he is not entitled to correction of his record to show award of the BSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002297
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The evidence also shows he participated in three campaigns during his service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018370
The applicant requests, in effect, that all awards he earned during his active duty service, to include service medals authorized for Republic of Vietnam (RVN) service, be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Combat Infantryman Badge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050008388
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 March 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050008388 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 4 September 1969 through 4 June 1970. As a result, the Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002174
The evidence of record shows the applicant was wounded in action. Therefore, he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 2 April 1970 and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars; b. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001769
The applicant's record shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. The record further shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars; b. awarding him the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 16 November 1967 through 18 August 1969; c. adding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062333C070421
The applicant states, in a five page letter submitted with his application through his senator, that because he left the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) without having his company records being reviewed, he may be entitled to the Bronze Star, the Air Medal and the Purple Heart as well as other awards or medals. The available records do not show that the applicant was awarded the Good Conduct Medal. There is no evidence of record, and the applicant has provided no evidence, which shows that he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004780
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded or authorized the: * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) * Purple Heart (PH) * Air Medal (AM) * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) 2. He provided, in part: * a BSM Certificate and citation that shows he was awarded the BSM for meritorious service during the period 1 August...