Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04103279C070208
Original file (04103279C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:         26 OCTOBER 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR2004103279


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Ms. Deborah L. Brantley           |     |Senior Analyst       |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John Slone                    |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Curtis Greenway               |     |Member               |
|     |Ms. Eloise Prendergast            |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his August 1970 separation document be
corrected to show that he was separated as a sergeant in pay grade E-5.

2.  The applicant states he needs his separation document to reflect his
correct rank and pay grade.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his promotion orders to pay grade E-5.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error or injustice
which occurred on 16 August 1970.  The application submitted in this case
is not dated but was received on 26 January 2004.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant was inducted
and entered active duty on 13 January 1969.  He was promoted to pay grade E-
4 on 9 September 1969 while serving in Vietnam.

4.  On 25 July 1970 the 4th Infantry Division in Vietnam issued orders
promoting the applicant to Sergeant, pay grade E-5, effective 7 July 1970.
The orders also awarded the applicant a specialty of 11B40 and withdrew his
previous specialty of 11B20.  Less than 30 days after the promotion orders
were issued, the applicant departed Vietnam enroute to the United States
for separation processing.

5.  On 16 August 1970 the applicant was released from active duty with an
honorable characterization of service.  His separation orders indicate that
he was separated in pay grade E-4 with a specialty of 11B20.

6.  There is no indication, in available records, that the applicant was
ever reduced from pay grade E-5 to pay grade E-4 prior to his separation
from active duty.
7.  In 1971 officials at the United States Army Reserve Personnel Center
notified the applicant that his file did not contain a copy of orders
promoting him to pay grade E-5 as he had indicated on a United States Army
Reserve form.  The applicant apparently provided a copy of his promotion
orders and in 1974 he was transferred from the United States Army Control
Group (Annual Training) to the United States Army Control Group (Standby)
in pay grade E-5.  No action, however, was ever taken to correct his 1970
separation document.

8.  Additionally, on 24 July 1970, the applicant was awarded an Army
Commendation Medal for meritorious service during the period August 1969 to
August 1970.  Like his promotion order, the award order apparently did not
reach his personnel file prior to his departure from Vietnam and as such,
was omitted from his separation document.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is sufficient evidence to confirm that the applicant was promoted
to sergeant, pay grade E-5, and awarded specialty 11B40 effective 1 July
1970.  There is no evidence or reason to suspect that the applicant was
ever reduced from pay grade E-5 to pay grade E-4 prior to his separation on
16 August 1970.  As such, it would be appropriate, and in the interest of
justice and equity to correct his 1970 separation document to show that he
was separated as a sergeant, in pay grade E-5, with a date of rank of 1
July 1970, and that he held specialty 11B40 vice 11B20, at the time of
separation.

2.  Although the applicant did not ask to have his record corrected to show
that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal, it is very likely that he
was unaware of the award.  In view of the fact that a Department of Defense
Form 215 (Correction to DD From 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge
from Active Duty) will be issued to reflect the correction of the
applicant’s rank, ect., it would be reasonable to also add his award of the
Army Commendation Medal, thereby negating the issuance of a second
correction form at a later date.

BOARD VOTE:

___JS___  ___CG__  ___EP___  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant
a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.  As a
result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the
individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was discharged as a
sergeant, pay grade E-5, with a date of rank of 1 July 1970, in specialty
11B40, and that he was awarded an Army Commendation Medal.




                            ______John Slone__________
                                      CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004103279                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20041026                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |GRANT                                   |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |131.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076566C070215

    Original file (2002076566C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: The applicant requests that Item 23 (Specialty Number and Title) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected by replacing military occupational specialty (MOS) 63C20 (Wheel Vehicle Mechanic) with MOS 11B40 (Light Weapons Infantryman); and that he be issued the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and any other pertinent awards. APPLICANT STATES : In essence, that he always served in MOS 11B40; that the orders that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016019

    Original file (20080016019.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show his awards of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Bronze Star Medal with two oak leaf clusters (BSM 2OLC), the Air Medal and the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the GCMDL and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005035

    Original file (20080005035.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General Orders Number 00267, Headquarters, 196th Infantry Brigade, Vietnam, dated 29 December 1971, awarding him the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force on 1 August 1971. c. General Orders Number 00049, Headquarters, 196th Infantry Brigade, Vietnam, dated 23 November 1971, awarding him the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious achievement in connection with military operations against a hostile force during the period 14...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090585C070212

    Original file (2003090585C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to add the awards that he was awarded and earned and are not recorded: i.e., the Purple Heart, the Air Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge, with Rifle Bar; and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge, with Carbine Bar. There is no entry, in Item 41, of the DA Form 20, showing that the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020744

    Original file (20100020744.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) he was awarded MOS 71B (Clerk-Typist) on 17 May 1968 * item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 22 January 1969 to 23 February 1970 * item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned for duty in Vietnam with: * Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, 79th Maintenance Battalion, from 25 January to 10 August 1969 * Headquarter and Headquarters Company, 3d Battalion, 8th Infantry,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018437

    Original file (20090018437.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders which show the applicant was awarded secondary MOS 11B40. The applicant's service personnel records contain an AE Form 2183 (Enlisted Personnel Data), dated 22 February 1973, which shows the applicant's primary MOS was 31G40 (awarded on 12 September 1969). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Combat Infantryman Badge, Good Conduct Medal, Army Commendation Medal with First Oak...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105185C070208

    Original file (2004105185C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the evidence of record confirms no service in MOS 95B and that the applicant’s service as a drill sergeant is fully documented. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show any error or injustice related to the documentation of his drill sergeant service in the record. The evidence of record provides no indication that the applicant ever served in MOS 95B during his USAR service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019484

    Original file (20080019484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was ordered to active duty on 10 April 1964 and served on active duty, to include service in Vietnam, until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 22 January 1966 and was returned to the USNR. On 31 December 1984, he was honorably REFRAD in the pay grade of E-7 and was transferred to the Retired List effective 1 January 1985. A review of the available records also fails to show that the applicant was ever deemed to have been wounded or injured as a result of enemy action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017648

    Original file (20060017648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the MOS (military occupation specialty), of 11B20, Light Weapons Infantryman, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Good Conduct Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant was trained as a teletypewriter repairman, in MOS, 31J20, and his last duty of assignment was with HHC, 4th Supply and Transport Battalion, 4th Infantry Division, in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069624C070402

    Original file (2002069624C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show his correct rank, MOS, unit of assignment, or all of his authorized awards. Although there is conflicting information in the available record concerning the applicant's unit of assignment in Vietnam, the promotion order shows his unit as Company A, 2/501 st Infantry and this unit should be reflected as his last unit of assignment on his DD Form 214. The available records show that the applicant was an infantryman assigned to an...