Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04102452C070208
Original file (04102452C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:            21 OCTOBER 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:   AR2004102452


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Kenneth H. Aucock             |     |Analyst              |


      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. James Anderholm               |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Ms. Deborah Jacobs                |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Ronald Weaver                 |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show that he has
       20 years of active federal service for retirement purposes, or
barring that,          20 qualifying years of service for Reserve retired
pay at age 60.

2.  The applicant states that at the time of his discharge he had 17 years
and      6 months of active service, and was informed that he did not have
an 18-year lock in.  Consequently, he had to be discharged because of
disability and receive severance pay.  Now he has been told that he has
over 18 years of service.  He has paid to the Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) the $66,556.80 in severance pay that he received.  He was in
active service for 19 years or more and received nothing for that time.
His service at the time that he was discharged was inaccurately computed.
He should at least get a 20 year letter and retire at      age 60, with
military identification card and all retirement benefits.  Had he known
that he had over 18 years of service he could have obtained an AGR (Active
Guard/Reserve) tour [to obtain 20 years of service].  He was the top AGR
recruiter for four years in New Jersey.  He could have retired in pay grade
E-9.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of
Release or Discharge from Active Duty), a copy of reassignment orders,
copies of statements of retirement points, a copy of his DA Form 2-1 and DA
Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record), and information concerning his
years of service creditable for retirement, and his retirement points.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant served in the Navy Reserve from 1962 to 1965.  He
enlisted in the Army on 27 March 1965 and remained on continuous active
duty until his discharge on 20 June 1974 in pay grade E-5.  The applicant
served in Germany and had two tours of duty in Vietnam.  His awards include
the Purple Heart, the Army Commendation Medal with "V" device, and the Air
Medal with "V" device.

2.  The applicant's DA Form 2-1 shows that he enlisted in the Army National
Guard in April 1980 and was assigned to a maintenance company in Phoenix,
Arizona.  He was transferred to the Inactive National Guard on 20 August
1983.  In November 1985 he was assigned to an Army Reserve unit,
subsequently ordered to an active duty tour of duty for 41 days, and in
June 1986 ordered to active duty as a recruiter on an AGR tour with duty in
Irvington, New Jersey.

3.  The applicant was discharged at Fort Meade, Maryland on 13 February
1991 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 because of physical
disability.  Orders show that he was awarded a 20 percent disability
rating.  His                 DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded
severance pay in the amount of $66,556.80.  His DD Form 214 shows that he
had almost 16 years of active service, and over 6 years of inactive
service.

4.  The applicant's chronological statement of retirement points, dated 2
October 2003, shows that he had 18 years, 3 months, and 17 days of
qualifying service for retired pay at age 60.  He had 16 plus years of
active service, which includes his active duty service while in a Reserve
component, but only 2 "good" years of Reserve component service.

5.  Other than as indicated herein, there are no available records
concerning the applicant's Reserve component service, nor any record
concerning his physical disability processing.

6.  Title 10, United States Code, chapter 61, provides disability
retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform
the duties of his office, rank, grade or rating because of disability
incurred while entitled to basic pay.

7.  Title 10, United States Code, section 1203, provides for the physical
disability separation of a member who has less than 20 years service and a
disability rated at less than 30 percent.

8.  Army Regulation 635-40 states that the Total Army Personnel Command
(PERSCOM) will issue orders or other disposition instructions for a Soldier
separated for physical disability with severance pay.

9.  Army Regulation 135-180 implements statutory authorities governing the
granting of retired pay to Soldiers and former Reserve Component Soldiers.
Paragraph 2-1 of that regulation states, in pertinent part, that to be
eligible for retired pay, an individual need not have a military status at
the time of application, but must have attained age 60, completed a minimum
of 20 years of qualifying service, and served the last 8 years (since
changed to 6 years under certain circumstances) of his qualifying service
as a Reserve component Soldier.

10.  Paragraph 2-8 of the above-mentioned regulation describes qualifying
service, as pertains to this case, as service performed in an active status
in a Reserve component or in active federal service.  After 30 June 1949, a
Reservist must earn a minimum of 50 retirement points each retirement year
to have that year credited as qualifying service, e.g. a "good year."  When
a person is in an active status for a period less than a full retirement
year, a minimum number of retirement points are required to be earned in
order to have that period credited as qualifying service.

11.  Section 1212 of title 10, United States Code, addresses eligibility
for disability severance pay by members of the Armed Forces.  The
provisions of section 1212(c) govern the recoupment of disability severance
pay from VA disability compensation payable for the same disability.
Section 1212(c) provides in pertinent part that, “[t]he amount of
disability severance pay received under this section shall be deducted from
any compensation for the same disability to which the former member of the
armed forces or his dependents become entitled under any law administered
by the Department of Veterans Affairs.”

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although evidence concerning the applicant's physical disability
processing is unavailable, regularity is presumed, that is, the applicant
was physically unfit to perform his duties and was discharged accordingly.
The applicant has provided no evidence to refute that presumption.

2.  The applicant had over 16 years of active federal service, and 2 "good"
years of service in the Army National Guard.  The applicant did not have 20
qualifying years of service for retired pay at age 60, and cannot receive
retired pay at     age 60.  Notwithstanding his assumption, there is no 18-
year lock in.  He was unable to perform his duties because of his physical
disability.  He could not have obtained an AGR tour of duty as he contends.
 The applicant's discharge was mandatory under the law.

3.  The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing
argument in support of his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___JA___  ___DJ___  ___RW__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.





            ___ James Anderholm_____
                    CHAIRPERSON




                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004102452                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DATE BOARDED            |20041021                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)    |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |YYYYMMDD                                |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR . . . . .                            |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |136.00                                  |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065521C070421

    Original file (2001065521C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), prescribes the policy and procedures for granting retired pay benefits at age 60, for the Army National Guard and Army Reserve. Paragraph 2-11 of this regulation covers computation of retired pay and paragraph 2-11c requires that each retirement applicant’s record will be screened to determine the highest grade held during his or her military service. Therefore, the Board recommends that the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004700

    Original file (20090004700.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In order to rectify the multiple errors, it is appropriate to correct the record to show that the applicant had 20 qualifying years of service as of 25 May 1992, that he was issued a proper 20-year letter, that he elected to receive non-regular retirement in lieu of disability severance pay, that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve 26 May 1992 with entitlement to retired pay upon attaining age 60, and that he was placed on the Retired List effective 26 June 2008 with entitlement to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017349C070206

    Original file (20050017349C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a NGB Form 22, with an effective date of 15 December 2003, which shows, in pertinent part, that at the time of the applicant's discharge she had completed a total of 19 years, 5 months, and 22 days service for retired pay. The evidence of records shows that the applicant completed her last 6 years of qualifying service as a member of the ARNG. The evidence of records also shows that, at the time of her discharge, the applicant...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050010029

    Original file (20050010029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He believed his 20-year letter made him eligible for retired pay at age 60 and any disability granted by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) would be offset by that retired pay. In 1994, he requested the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to change his discharge with severance pay to a medical retirement. The applicant's contention that he was not counseled regarding the choices available to him at the time of his separation (in regard to accepting severance pay or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008198

    Original file (20130008198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was released from service in 1991 and early retirement was not offered; he was ultimately discharged in 2005 but he was not aware of the 15-year letter * he did not request to be removed from the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) and he has several letters from commanding officers not to remove him from the AGR * he was released from active duty in 1993 due to downsizing and he was placed in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) with 18 years of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000582

    Original file (20080000582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He requested a copy of Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1374(A), which was listed as the authority for transferring him to the Retired Reserve in the rank and grade of LTC, O-5. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers), paragraph 4-18b of the version in effect at the time (Update 22, dated 1 June 1990), stated a Reserve officer, on transfer to the Retired Reserve, would be “Transferred in the Reserve grade for which selected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007760

    Original file (20080007760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. His ARNG Retirement Points History Statement and USAR Chronological Statement of Retirement show he completed 19 years, 8 months, and 1 day of creditable service for non-active duty retired pay as of 21 August 1996. In a previous request to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), the applicant sought correction of his records to show he had 20 qualifying years for a non-regular Reserve retirement at the time of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006232

    Original file (20090006232.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-40 provides for the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform the military duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating because of a physical disability. Army Regulation 635-40 requires that when a Soldier has a rating of less than 30 percent and has at least 20 qualifying years for retirement for non-regular service the DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board [PEB] Proceedings) should have the entry: "You have the option of accepting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015060

    Original file (20100015060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was retired instead of medically discharged with entitlement to severance pay. With respect to his years of active service, the available evidence of record shows the applicant completed 15 years, 11 months, and 25 days of total active service and 17 years, 1 month, and 12 days of qualifying service toward non-regular retirement. With respect to the total active and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003369

    Original file (20070003369.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 18 May 2005, the applicant reviewed the TDRL evaluation board findings and recommendations. Army Regulation 635-40, (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) states, in pertinent part, when a Soldier has a disability rating of less than 30 percent and is found unfit for continued service and has at least 20 years of qualifying years for retirement for non-regular service they have the option of accepting the discharge with disability severance pay and forfeiting...