Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091730C070212
Original file (2003091730C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 19 February 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003091730


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. G. E. Vandenberg Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond J. Wagner Chairperson
Mr. Melvin H. Meyer Member
Mr. Robert L. Duecaster Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:


1. The applicant requests that he be allowed to recoup 16 days of leave lost during Fiscal Year 2002.

2. The applicant states he was unable to use his leave due to the short notice for attendance at consecutive service schools.

3. The applicant provides copies of his orders to attend Officer Candidate School (OCS), the Armor Officer Basic Course (AOBC) and the Scout Platoon Leader Course; copies of his leave request; and copies of three of his Leave and Earning Statements (LESs).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant’s enlisted records are not of record, and the only information on his available officer microfiche is his oath of office dated 6 September 2002.

2. On 8 April 2002 the applicant, then a staff sergeant (E-6), received orders to attend OCS at Fort Benning, Georgia, 2 June 2002 through 10 September 2002 and AOBC at Fort Knox, 17 September 2002 through 4 February 2003.

3. A DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave) dated 19 May 2002 shows:

•         He had 66.5 days of accrued leave and requested 29 days leave for the period 19 May 2002 through 5 March 2003;

•         13 days permanent change of station (PCS) leave from 19 May 2002 through 31 May 2002;

•         TDY (temporary duty) at OCS from 1 June 2002 through 10 September 2002;

•         6 days regular leave from 11 through 16 September 2002;

•         TDY to AOBC from 17 September 2002 through 4 February 2003;

•         21 days regular leave from 4 through 24 February 2003; and

•         Permissive TDY from 25 February 2003 through 6 March 2003.

4. His orders were amended to place him on TDY to attend the Scout Platoon Leader Course 3 through 27 February 2003.

5. On 1 May 2003 his unit commander submitted a memorandum on the applicant’s behalf requesting consideration of recoupment of 16 days of leave lost in fiscal year 2002. The commander stated that the applicant had originally requested 24 days of leave but due to school dates was only able to take 8 days due to the short notice of attendance at the military schools.

6. The 1 – 30 September 2002 LES shows he had a leave balance of 84 days, no days of leave used in that fiscal year (FY), and 24 days in a use or lose status. It also shows the applicant was in the pay grade O-1E (second lieutenant with prior enlisted service) with a pay base entry date of 11 September 1990.

7. The 1 – 31 October 2002 LES shows a leave balance of 62.5 days, no days of leave used in this FY, 24 days of leave lost, and 30 days in a use or lose status.

8. The 1 – 30 April 2003 LES shows a leave balance of 61.5 days, 26 days of leave used, 16 day of leave lost, and 4 days in a use or lose status. This LES also shows that his use or lose leave was adjusted to show 8 days used,
19 – 26 May 2002, thereby reducing his lost leave to 16 days.

9. On 22 July 2002 an advisory opinion was obtained from the Total Army Personnel Command. The Chief, Personnel Service Branch, stated that the Army Leave and Pass program is designed to allow a soldier to carry the maximum amount of leave possible for the longest period authorized under the law. Except for very specific exceptions in cases of service in hostile fire or imminent danger assignments, there are no waivers for carrying over any leave over 60 days. The Chief stated that soldiers who wait to the end of a fiscal year to use their leave are aware that they risk losing it due to unforeseen requirements or situations. He stated that the fact that the applicant was unable to take his leave due to attendance at the service schools does not meet the exception.

10. A copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant, on 29 July 2003. No rebuttal or additional comment is of record.

11. Title 10, United States Code (USC), section 701(f), states that a soldier may accrue and carry forward up to 60 days leave at the end of each fiscal year. The only exception is that soldiers who serve for 120 continuous days in a area where hostile fire/immanent danger pay or in support of an ongoing operation may carry the excess to the end of the next fiscal year.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS :

1. The applicant was a staff sergeant (E-6) with 11 years of service at the time he received his orders to attend OCS. He would have been well aware of the 60-day maximum accrued leave carryover regulation.

2. Although the specifics of his application for and acceptance of a commission are not of record, he would have been advised of that acceptance and been given the projected date of his attendance at OCS before he received the actual orders to report.

3. The applicant has offered no evidence that he was precluded from taking leave in the 7 months prior to his orders to report to OCS or in the 2 months before his reporting date.

4. Further, the applicant had only requested 18 days leave, during FY 2002, despite knowing that he would have 24 days of use or lose on the books.

5. There is no regulation or policy that will allow the Board to grant an exception to the 60-day maximum accrued leave carryover set in the law.


BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__ RJW __ ___ MHM _ __ RLD __ DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.





                  _Raymond J. Wagner_____
                  CHAIRPERSON


INDEX

CASE ID AR2003091730
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20040219
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 1 Recoupment of leave lost
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005658

    Original file (20070005658.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's October 2006 LES shows that he had a balance of 49.5 days of accrued leave, lost 19 days, and 17 use/lose leave. On 5 February 2007, the G1 replied to the applicant's question, "Can a Soldier without any SLA and with a leave balance of 87 days retire on 30 September and cash in 31 days of leave on 30 September and go into transition leave for the remainder of October and November"? The applicant reported for his final outprocessing on 29 September 2006, one day prior to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007233C070208

    Original file (20040007233C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 September 2003 the applicant requested 128 days of leave from 25 January 2004 to 31 May 2004, 108 days of which were accrued leave, and 20 days of which were permissive TDY (25 January 2004 to 13 February 2004). The MC was further informed that there were no provisions under the law that allowed Soldiers to cash in leave after separation from military service; however, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records had the authority to approve request for exceptions to policy. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003997

    Original file (20110003997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In FY 2010, he earned 27 days (1 October 2009 through 24 August 2010) accruing a leave balance of 124.5 days of leave. k. the Commanding General, Army Human Resources Command, is the approval authority for requests for special leave accrual. DFAS records also show he earned 27 days (1 October 2009 through 24 August 2010) in FY 2010, accruing a leave balance of 124.5 days of leave.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000458

    Original file (20080000458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Military Personnel (MILPER) Message 04-298, dated 28 October 2004, and effective 1 October 2004, implemented new SLA guidance for Soldiers serving in HFP/IDP by allowing Soldiers to accumulate up to 120 days of SLA and that any leave in excess of 60 days accumulated under this provision is lost if not used by the end of the third fiscal year (FY). The evidence of record shows that at that time, Soldiers were authorized to retain a 60-day leave balance year to year. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021108

    Original file (20120021108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he: * lost 17.5 days of leave due to "Use/Lose" in FY 2010 * was assigned to the Warrior Transition Unit (WTU) on 19 May 2010 * was not afforded an opportunity to take leave prior to 1 October 2010 due to the number of appointments and the time between the appointments * requested permission to submit an exception to policy prior to his medical retirement on 27 May 2011, but his command denied it * is requesting an exception to policy as a Reservist who served on active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068017C070402

    Original file (2002068017C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reinstatement of his Special Leave Accrual (SLA) that was erroneously taken away by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in October 1999. At that time the applicant departed the SLA area with a SLA leave balance of 35 days. Accrued leave that exceeds 60 days at the end of the fiscal year is lost except as authorized for special leave accrual up to 90 days to provide relief to soldiers who are not allowed leave when undergoing lengthy deployment or during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016942

    Original file (20100016942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Defense Finance and Accounting Service submitted a response to a congressional inquiry on 4 August 2008 and stated the applicant: * separated with 34.5 days of accrued lump sum leave * accumulated 90 days of leave on 30 September 2007 (end of fiscal year) * wasn’t entitled to special leave accrual * was only authorized to carry forward no more than 60 days of leave * lost 30 days of accrued leave on 1 October 2007 7. The evidence of record does not show the applicant has been unjustly...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000710C070206

    Original file (20050000710C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DFAS explained that, according to their internal instructions, he was authorized to carry over (in excess of 60 days) into the new fiscal year only the amount of days he earned while in the combat zone. His total authorized leave balance at the end of September 2003 should have been 75 days (15 days SLA leave and 60 days regular leave). He took 92 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019779

    Original file (20110019779.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This memorandum stated: a. the applicant submitted an official request for the recoupment of 15.5 days of personal leave that was surrendered upon release from active duty on 14 November 2008; and b. while under the BG's command in SOCKOR the applicant was unable to utilize all of his accrued leave due the following mitigating circumstances: * The applicant was awaiting the disposition of his case with the Department of the Army Selective Continuation Board * Personnel shortages in his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016000

    Original file (20070016000.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following members, a quorum, were present: The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. She used 22 days while serving in Germany and 8 days on route to her BNCOC, or which 20 days used did not qualify as combat zone leave; thereby, precluding her from accumulating SLA beyond 67 days. The evidence of record in this case confirms that upon her departure from Iraq on 31 October 2006, the applicant had 85.5 days of accrued leave...