Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091716C070212
Original file (2003091716C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF
        

         BOARD DATE: 23 March 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003091716

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Thomas D. Howard Chairperson
Ms. Karen A. Heinz Member
Mr. Lawrence Foster Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election he made on his DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Pay) be changed from former spouse and dependent children (block 26f) to former spouse (block 26g).

2. The applicant states, in effect, that he admits that he made the error at the time and accepts responsibility for his carelessness. However, it was never his intent to enroll his children because he has more than sufficient civilian insurance to cover his children. He goes on to state that he did not voluntarily enroll in the SBP and never had any intentions of doing so. However, he was under a court order to do so as part of his divorce from his former spouse. He continues by stating that his former spouse remarried prior to his retirement and her 55th birthday, which rendered her ineligible to receive SBP benefits. He goes on to state that he notified Defense Finance and Accounting (DFAS) officials and provided them a copy of his former spouse's marriage license. After contacting DFAS officials for a 3-month period, his records were finally corrected to stop the SBP payments for his former spouse. However, he later learned that DFAS was deducting SBP premiums for his children and after reviewing his DD Form 2656, he discovered that he had made a mistake in the block he checked. As a result of his carelessness, he has been making unwanted and unneeded SBP payments for 2 years.

3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 2656, a copy of his report of separation (DD Form 214) and a copy of his divorce decree.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant was promoted to the rank of colonel on 1 May 1997 and on 10 May 1999, he and his spouse were granted a final decree of divorce in the District Court of El Paso County, Texas.

2. The decree of divorce specifies (beginning on pages 21 and 38) that the applicant would provide child support payments for his two dependent children born in 1986 and 1987, until such time as they turned 18 years of age or graduated from high school and that the applicant would enroll his former spouse in the SBP under former spouse coverage and that the costs were to be borne by the former spouse.

3. On 9 September 2002, the applicant completed and authenticated a DD Form 2656 in which he elected SBP coverage for his former spouse and dependent children (block 26f). At that time his children were 15 and 16 years of age.

4. On 31 January 2003, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and was placed on the Retired List effective 1 February 2003. He had served 28 years, 4 months and 14 days of total active service. At the time he became eligible for enrollment in the SBP, his children were 16 and 17 years of age.

5. Title 10, United States Code, section 1447. Uniformed Service Former Spouses' Protection Act, provides, in effect, that a former spouse who remarries before age 55 loses SBP eligibility; however, if the marriage ends in death, divorce or annulment, eligibility is reinstated. A former spouse who remarries after age 55 does not lose eligibility under Public Law 99-661, 14 November 1986.

6. Public Law 99-45, 8 November 1985, effective 1 March 1986, permitted the election of the former spouse and child coverage. Children are covered under the SBP until age 18 or until age 22, if full time students.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. Although the applicant does not claim any error or injustice on the part of the Department, he does claim that he made an error and checked the wrong block on his DD Form 2656, when he checked the former spouse and dependent children option (block 26f) instead of just the former spouse option (block 26e).

2. The applicant's contention that his divorce decree only required that he enroll in the SBP under the former spouse option is confirmed by a review of the decree of divorce provided by the applicant.

3. The evidence also shows that at the time he became eligible for enrollment in the SBP, his children were 16 and 17 years of age and therefore had a very limited window of eligibility to receive benefits in the event of the death of the applicant.

4. Therefore, it is reasonable to presume, (given the limited window of eligibility his children would have) that his election of former spouse and dependent children was in fact an administrative error on his part.

5. Accordingly, the evidence suggests that it would be in the interest of justice and equity on the part of the Board to allow him to change his SBP election to that of former spouse only, effective the same date as his original election and that all premiums collected for his children's coverage be returned to him.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__LF___ __TDH___ __KH___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:


The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.





                  Thomas D. Howard
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003091716
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2004/03/23
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1.350 137.0400/CHG ELECTION
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029917

    Original file (20100029917.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage within 1 year of his divorce. This form also indicates he married Celeste on 23 November 1984; b. a DD Form 2656-9 (SBP and Reserve Component (RC)/SBP Open Enrollment Election), dated 5 May 2010, that shows he elected former-spouse coverage for Dorothy and his date of marriage to Celeste is shown as 16 October 1984; and c. a DD Form 2656-10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006822

    Original file (20090006822.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show he elected former spouse Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage in conjunction with his divorce. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: self-authored statement; letter of support, DD Form 2656-1 (Survivor Benefit Election (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage), Decree of Divorce , and Separation Agreement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001121

    Original file (20120001121.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 23 April 2010, by letter, DFAS officials notified the applicant's former spouse that her application for payment of a portion of the applicant's retired pay under the Uniformed Services Former Spouse's Protection Act was received but could not be approved because the court order she provided did not provide sufficient information to calculate the amount of retired pay. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011092

    Original file (20130011092.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. The applicant has not remarried since the divorce from his former spouse. The applicant believed that the former spouse or her attorney would make the election for former spouse SBP coverage because she wanted and initiated the divorce. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009743

    Original file (20120009743.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show he timely changed his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage at the time of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity as a result of his death. The FSM twice elected "spouse" coverage while married to the applicant and he was required to make a former spouse election as per their divorce decree. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022811

    Original file (20100022811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) provided by DFAS shows the following: * retirement date – 1 October 2004 * spouse – F____ * child – S____ with a date of birth of 23 July 1991 * SBP election – 26b, coverage for spouse and child(ren) * date signed – 7 July 2004 4. DFAS stated in an email to this Board, dated 9 May 2011, the FSM's DD Form 2656 was submitted by Fort Carson on 3 November 2004 and shows he elected spouse and child(ren) coverage. The applicant and the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013522

    Original file (20140013522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from former spouse to spouse coverage. On 14 July 2014, the applicant and Sallie were married and on 28 July 2014, he submitted a DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Certificate Change) to DFAS. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011387

    Original file (20080011387.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his beneficiary for Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage be changed from his spouse to his former spouse and that premiums for this SBP coverage be deducted from his former spouse's entitlement to his retired pay. The evidence of record shows the applicant divorced his spouse of 23 years on 29 June 2005. The applicant has requested a change in beneficiary for SBP coverage of from spouse to former spouse to comply with his agreement with his former...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009597

    Original file (20080009597.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that the records of the FSM be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse and children coverage. Records at DFAS show no one is currently receiving the SBP annuity. The available evidence of record indicates that the FSM did not remarry and as previously stated, the applicant continued to pay SBP spouse premiums until he died.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023390

    Original file (20110023390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Orders 343-072 (Retired Reserve) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 23B (Army National Guard (ARNG) Retirement Points History Statement) * Letters from her divorce attorney * Superior Court of the State of New York, County of Orange, Court Order – Acceptance for Processing and Amended Court Order – Acceptable for Processing * Correspondence with and from DFAS * DD Form 2656-10 (SBP/RCSBP Request for Deemed Election) * Copies of certified mail receipts * Letter from...