| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deborah L. Brantley | Senior Analyst |
| Mr. Arthur A. Omartian | Chairperson | |
| Mr. John T. Meixell | Member | |
| Ms. Mae M. Bullock | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his separation document be corrected to reflect award of the Bronze Star Medal with “V” device.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he received the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service during the period March 1967 to March 1968. However, he states that he also was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with “V” device for his heroic actions on 12 July 1967.
3. The applicant provides a copy of the orders awarding him the Bronze Star Medal with “V” device.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on
20 February 1969. The application submitted in this case is dated 23 May 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. Records available to the Board indicate that the applicant entered active duty on 23 February 1966. He successfully completed training and was initially assigned to Fort Hood, Texas, prior to being reassigned to Vietnam in April 1967. While in Vietnam, he was assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 27th Infantry.
4. Item 41 (awards and decorations) on the applicant’s Department of the Army Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) indicates that the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal on 25 September 1967 by General Order 3801, issued by the 25th Infantry Division. The entry, which does not reflect a “V” device, does reflect a date of 12 July 1967 in parentheses. The entry in item 41 is consistent with the information confirmed in the orders provided by the applicant, which awarded him that Bronze Star Medal with “V” device. There is no indication, or evidence, that the applicant was also awarded a Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service.
5. The applicant departed Vietnam in April 1968 and completed his enlistment contract as a drill sergeant at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. He was released from active duty on 20 February 1969, in pay grade E-5, with an honorable characterization of service. The applicant’s separation document reflects award of the Bronze Star Medal, but without the “V” device.
6. A review of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) notes the applicant’s unit was credited with participating in four designated campaigns (Vietnam Counteroffensive Phases II, III, and IV, and TET Counteroffensive) during the applicant’s period of assignment. Four bronze service stars on the Vietnam Service Medal, which is recorded on his separation document, should reflect his campaign participation. The unit was also awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during his tenure with the organization.
7. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time when the service member was discharged, required that throughout a qualifying period of service for award of the Good Conduct Medal the enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. With the publication of the new Army Regulation 672-5-1, in 1974, the requirement for all excellent conduct and efficiency ratings was dropped and an individual was required to show that he/she willingly complied with the demands of the military environment, had been loyal and obedient, and faithfully supported the goals of his organization and the Army. Today, Army Regulation 600-8-22, which replaced Army Regulation 672-5-1, notes that there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal and disqualification must be justified. Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond.
8. The applicant’s conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service were excellent, and he had no record of any disciplinary actions or incidents of misconduct.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant’s Bronze Star Medal was awarded with a “V” device indicating the award was for valor. The “V” device should be added to the Bronze Star Medal entry currently on his separation document.
2. The evidence also shows that the applicant is entitled to four bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.
3. The applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 20 February 1969. There is no evidence his commander ever disqualified him from receiving the award and no evidence of any misconduct which would justify denying him the award. In view of the foregoing, it can be concluded that the applicant met the basic qualifications for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and it would be appropriate and in the interest of equity to award him that decoration for the period 23 February 1966 through 20 February 1969.
BOARD VOTE:
__AAO __ __JTM __ __MMB__ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003091697 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | YYYYMMDD |
| DATE BOARDED | 20040226 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR) |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | YYYYMMDD |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR . . . . . |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | GRANT |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 107.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011988
The applicant provides copies of his: * Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device orders and certificate * Bronze Star Medal (First Oak Leaf Cluster) certificate and citation * letter authorizing acceptance of the Gallantry Cross Medal with Bronze Star awarded by the Republic of Vietnam with orders and translation * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Additionally, this item shows his conduct and efficiency ratings were excellent. e. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations): * National Defense...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002614C070205
Karmin Jenkins | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant is also entitled to a silver service star on his Vietnam Service Medal and a Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 18 February 1969; b. by showing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010861
Furthermore, Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 9 August 1967...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026404
Army Regulation 600-8-22 states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service ribbon for each credited campaign, to include the Vietnam Service Medal. Since the governing regulation states only one decoration will be awarded to an individual or unit for the same act, and the Silver Star is properly shown on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 September 1969, there is no basis for granting his request to show the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device (2nd Oak Leaf Cluster) on his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004501C070205
Four bronze service stars on the Vietnam Service Medal, which is recorded on his separation document, should reflect his campaign participation. The applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 19 March 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected: a. by showing that he was awarded a Bronze Star Medal with "V" device and an Army Commendation Medal; b. by showing he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005141
His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * Bronze Star Medal * Army Commendation Medal * Air Medal 8. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal for his period of service from 9 October 1967 through 13 May 1969 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show it. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028929
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device * Purple Heart * Combat Infantryman Badge * two awards of the Air Medal 2. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 March 1971 shows the: * National Defense Service Medal * Army Commendation Medal * three...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013009
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service ribbon, to include the Vietnam Service Medal, for each credited campaign. In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service from 6 April 1967 to 1 April 1969 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022067
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Deleting the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars; and c. Adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Valorous Unit Award * Meritorious Unit Commendation *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026733
He should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the period 7 September 1966 to 20 June 1968, based on his conduct and efficiency ratings and overall record of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the period 7 September 1966 to 20 June 1968 and amending his DD Form 214 to delete the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification...