Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091310C070212
Original file (2003091310C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 13 January 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003091310

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Lana E. McGlynn Chairperson
Mr. Roger W. Able Member
Mr. Patrick H. McGann Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:


1. The applicant requests, in effect, refund of Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) payments in the amount of $11,700.

2. The applicant states, in effect, that no one but he is entitled to his SBP benefit and he would like a refund of the amount withheld from his monthly retired pay because his ex-wife committed bigamy.

3. In support of his application, the applicant provides a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214), a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) letter, dated 1 November 2002, which certifies he is entitled to compensation for a service connected disability, and a copy of Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) letter response to a Congressional Inquiry, dated 12 May 2003. The applicant failed to provide any documents related to his divorce from his ex-wife or any related to requests regarding his SBP benefit.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. On 31 July 1986, the applicant was released from active duty for the purpose of retirement. At the time, he had completed a total of 20 years and 26 days of active military service and held the rank and pay grade of sergeant first class/E-7 (SFC/E-7).

2. The applicant’s record includes a Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel (DA Form 4240) that was prepared on 30 July 1986, during his retirement processing. Part III (SBP-Election) confirms the applicant elected full spouse SBP coverage at the time.

3. The applicant failed to provide any court documents regarding his divorce. However, the DFAS Congressional Inquiry response he provided confirms that he was divorced on 8 May 2001, and his former spouse remained a legal SBP beneficiary and received continued financial protection through that date.

4. Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1452 provides the legal authority for the reduction in retired pay for spouse and former spouse annuities. The law states, in pertinent part, that as a general rule, a person is not entitled to refund of any amount deducted from retired pay under this section.


5. Regardless of the SBP option elected, you must promptly notify the finance center if you divorce, if your spouse dies or if you remarry. This ensures premiums are properly suspended or resumed. SBP premiums stop when there is no longer an eligible beneficiary in a premium category, such as a spouse is lost through death or divorce. If a spouse is lost through death or divorce, spouse premiums are suspended.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. The evidence of record in this case confirms that the applicant elected full spouse SBP coverage at the time of his retirement, and that premium payments for this elected coverage were properly deducted from his retired pay while there remained an eligible beneficiary as is required by law.

2. Although the independent evidence provided by the applicant is limited, it appears that he was not legally divorced until 8 May 2001. Prior to that date, his former spouse remained an eligible spouse SBP beneficiary and continued to receive the benefit of SBP coverage.

3. As the applicant was advised by DFAS officials, the law stipulates that there is no entitlement to refund of any amounts deducted from retired pay for SBP premiums. However, premium payments are stopped once there is no eligible beneficiary. In this case, it appears the applicant’s premium payments were stopped on 8 May 2001, when he and his former spouse divorced.

4. Although the reasons for divorce as represented by the applicant were unfortunate, regrettably the facts of the case do not provide a sufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.

5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.


BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

PM___ __LEM__ __RA __ __ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.





                  Lana E. McGlynn
                  CHAIRPERSON







INDEX

CASE ID AR2003091310
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/12/DD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1986/07/31
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200
DISCHARGE REASON Retirement
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 346 137.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099916C070208

    Original file (2004099916C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The record shows that neither the FSM nor the applicant took any action to request a change to the FSM’s SBP election to former spouse coverage within a year of the divorce decree being issued, as is required by law. On 10 November 2003, in letter response to a Congressional Inquiry, the DFAS indicated their records indicated the applicant did not request to change his SBP election to former spouse and that the applicant did not make a deemed election for former spouse coverage. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007341

    Original file (20080007341.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the un-remarried former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that her ex-husband's records be corrected to show he elected to provide her an annuity as his "former spouse" under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Thus, it would be appropriate to correct the record to show that the FSM changed his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" on the date of his divorce from the applicant, and to provide the applicant all SBP annuity payments due from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014744

    Original file (20110014744.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. DFAS informed the Board's staff their records indicated that the FSM and applicant divorced on 1 April 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM made a voluntary change in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6055 13

    Original file (NR6055 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In May 2013, Petitioner a _— my applied deceased former spouse's to BCNR re ing to correct her " |g record to show that he elected former spouse coverage within one year of his divorce, pursuant to a divorce decree, enclosure (1). to DFAS requesting former spouse SBP coverage within one year of their divorce, as required by law. Although the Board recognized that Petitioner, at that time, did not submit a deemed election within one year from the date of divorce as required by law, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000357

    Original file (20100000357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SBP Coverage section of the document shows the spouse's date of birth as 27 January 1957. The SBP Coverage section of the document shows the spouse's date of birth as 4 November 1961. The evidence of record shows the applicant remarried and his second spouse (C_____ A. Y____) became eligible for the spouse SBP coverage, as SBP coverage is governed by category; however, they also later divorced There is no evidence of record to show the applicant took any action to request a change to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007028

    Original file (20080007028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records show that he was honorably released from the New Mexico Army National Guard on 31 January 2008 and transferred to the Retired Reserve after completing more than 38 years of military service. The applicant contends that RC-SBP premium deductions for insurable interest coverage from his retired pay for the months of February, March, and April 2008 should be refunded to him. The latter request, if granted by the Board, would result in a refund of his SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9509208C070209

    Original file (9509208C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by canceling “person with insurable interest (daughter)” beneficiary and by changing the date of his RC-SBP (Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan) participation from 16 July 1984 to 11 January 1987 with the beneficiary being his current spouse. Public Law 95-397, effective 1 October 1978, extended eligibility for coverage under the SBP to members and former members of the Reserve Components (RC) who had 20 or more years of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05676-02

    Original file (05676-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments NPC memorandum of 8 August 2002 Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). e. In September 1996 the Defense Finance and Accounting Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004698

    Original file (20140004698.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage and that she be granted the benefits described in their divorce decree (Tri-Care for Life, Military Identification Card, and Post Exchange and Commissary Privileges). The divorce decree provided by the applicant with her application did not award the applicant SBP entitlements. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016844

    Original file (20130016844.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a retired, and now deceased, former service member (FSM), requests in effect correction of her former husband's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The applicant states: * her former spouse elected Option C on 15 January 1988 when he received his 20-year letter and on 31 December 1992 when he retired * she and the FSM were divorced after 20 years of marriage...