Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091296C070212
Original file (2003091296C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 20 November 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003091296


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Beverly A. Young Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann Langston Chairperson
Ms. Linda D. Simmons Member
Mr. Robert Duecaster Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests correction of item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was a "reconnaissance specialist."

2. The applicant states that he was not a clerk typist in Vietnam. He claims that he was a "Recon Specialist."

3. The applicant provides a letter from his Recon sergeant in Vietnam.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on 5 September 1969. The application submitted in this case is dated 9 September 2002.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 29 March 1966 for a period of six years. On 1 August 1966, he was ordered to active duty for basic combat training at the U.S. Army Reception Station, Company A, 1st Battalion, 2nd Brigade, Fort Lewis, Washington.

4. The applicant's personnel records contain Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center Infantry, Fort Lewis, Washington Special Orders Number 132 dated 25 October 1966 which reassigned him for advanced individual training (AIT) in military occupational specialty (MOS) 71A (Clerk).

5. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was awarded primary MOS 71B (Clerk Typist) on 19 December 1966.

6. The applicant was released from active duty on 21 December 1966 and returned to the Army National Guard. His DD Form 214 with an ending date of 21 December 1966 shows his specialty number and title as "71A10 (Clerk)."

7. The applicant was ordered to active duty again on 13 May 1968. He served in Vietnam from 11 September 1968 through 25 August 1969.

8. The applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was assigned to Headquarters Company, 116th Engineer Battalion in duty MOS 71B as a records clerk from 11 September 1968 to 3 December 1968. His DA Form 20 also shows he served in duty MOS 12B (Combat Construction Specialist) and 51N (Water Supply Specialist) during his tour in Vietnam.

9. He was released from active duty on 5 September 1969. His DD Form 214 with an ending date of 5 September 1969 shows the entry "71B20 Clerk Typist" in item 23a.

10. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. The regulation provides, in pertinent part, that the primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) and all additional military occupational specialties (MOS) served in for a period of one year or more, during the soldier’s continuous active military service, will be entered in item 23a (Specialty Number & Title).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. The applicant was ordered to active duty for training in August 1966. Upon successful completion of AIT, he was awarded primary MOS 71B (Clerk Typist).

2. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in duty MOS 71B, 12B, and 51N during his assignment in Vietnam. There is no evidence of record which shows he served as a "reconnaissance specialist."

3. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 5 September 1969; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 5 September 1972. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

JL______ LDS_____ RD_______ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.




                  ______________________
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003091296
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20031120
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Chun
ISSUES 1. 100.0500
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014074

    Original file (20130014074.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests his military occupational specialty (MOS) be changed on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) from 71B2O (Clerk Typist) to 11B2O (Infantryman). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of record shows the applicant attended AIT and was awarded MOS 11B on 9 April 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016756

    Original file (20100016756.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence which shows he was awarded a truck MOS. Since the governing regulation states that the primary MOS code number and title would be entered in item 23a, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005014

    Original file (20110005014.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Number) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 11D (Armor Reconnaissance Specialist). Army Regulation 635-5 states that items 23a and 23b will document the codes and titles of the separating Soldiers PMOS. The evidence of record confirms the applicant's PMOS was 71B, not 11D; therefore, his DD Form 214 is correct as stated and there is an insufficient basis to grant relief in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004992

    Original file (20140004992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his correct military occupational specialty (MOS) and mailing address after separation. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in – * item 22 (MOS) – * Primary MOS (PMOS) 11E2O, Armor Crewman, 18 October 1968 (this entry is lined-thru/deleted) * PMOS 71B3O, Clerk Typist, 30 January 1969 * item 31 (Foreign Service) – he served in Vietnam from 7...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014293

    Original file (20110014293.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states his DD Form 214 should be corrected to document the correct rank and pay grade and military occupational specialty (MOS) and MOS training completed. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows his rank/grade as SP4/E-4 in items 5a and 5b, and his date of rank as 26 August 1966 in item 6 (Date of Rank).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002326C070206

    Original file (20050002326C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, item 38 (record of assignments) on his Department of the Army Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) contains a penciled entry replacing his typed duty MOS (military occupational specialty) of 71B20 with a duty MOS of 11E and a handwritten principal duty title of "tank armored" over the typed entry of clerk typist. The evidence confirms the applicant did hold an infantry specialty, was assigned to a cavalry unit, was wounded as a result of hostile actions, and the statement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020744

    Original file (20100020744.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) he was awarded MOS 71B (Clerk-Typist) on 17 May 1968 * item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Vietnam from 22 January 1969 to 23 February 1970 * item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned for duty in Vietnam with: * Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, 79th Maintenance Battalion, from 25 January to 10 August 1969 * Headquarter and Headquarters Company, 3d Battalion, 8th Infantry,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028355

    Original file (20100028355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was awarded MOS 71B (clerk typist) on 13 August 1971. The evidence of record shows he was initially trained in MOS 71B and that he was awarded MOS 71B as his primary MOS while serving on active duty. Therefore, at the time his DD Form 214 was completed and issued, it correctly showed his primary specialty number and title as 71B, clerk typist.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004812

    Original file (20120004812.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 20 also shows in: * item 22 (MOS) that he was awarded MOS 71B effective 4 December 1968 – no other specialties are recorded * item 27 (Military Education) that he completed Basic Army Administrative training in MOS 71B in 1966 – no training for MOS 11B or 36K is recorded * item 38 entries related to assignments in MOS 71B – no entries for service in MOS 11B or 36K are recorded 5. There is no evidence in his available records and he provides none to show he was awarded or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013110

    Original file (20090013110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected by showing his military occupational specialty (MOS) as 11B (Infantryman) in item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) and adding the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) to the awards entered in item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign...