Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091219C070212
Original file (2003091219C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF
        

         BOARD DATE: 18 December 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003091219

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Joseph A. Adriance Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor Chairperson
Mr. James E. Anderholm Member
Ms. Yolanda Maldonado Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 23 (Type of Separation) of his
21 July 1986 separation document (DD Form 214) be changed from “Relief from active duty” to Discharge.

2. The applicant states, in effect, that he wants to get an Honorable Discharge Certificate to hang on his wall. However, he was never discharged from the active Army. He requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to accurately reflect that he was discharged from the Army.

3. The applicant provides a copy of his 21 July 1986 DD Form 214 in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of a perceived error that occurred on
21 July 1986. The application submitted in this case is dated 17 May 2003.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. The applicant’s record shows that he served on active duty for 1 year,
7 months, and 21 days from 4 December 1984 through 21 July 1986. The
DD Form 214 he was issued on the date of his separation confirms that he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) under the provisions of paragraph 6-3b, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of hardship. This document also confirms that he was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group to complete his eight year military service obligation (MSO), which terminated on 3 December 1972. The applicant authenticated the DD Form 214 with his signature on the date of his REFRAD.

4. On 29 March 1988, subsequent to his REFRAD, the applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG). He continuously served in the ARNG for 3 years until 28 March 1991.


5. Letter Order Number 4E-14, dated 15 April 1991, issued by the Office of the Adjutant General, State of California, directed the applicant’s honorable discharge from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army, effective 28 March 1991, by reason of expiration of term of service.

6. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. This regulation stipulates, in effect, that soldiers released from active duty with a remaining statutory MSO will be transferred to a Reserve Component to complete that obligation. Paragraph 2-10 contains guidance on issuing Honorable Discharge Certificates and it states, in pertinent part, that these certificates will be issued only to those members being discharged. There are no regulatory provisions that provide for issuing an Honorable Discharge Certificate to those members transferred to a Reserve component.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. The evidence of record confirms that upon his REFRAD on 21 July 1986, the applicant was transferred to the USAR Control Group to complete his statutory MSO. Therefore, he was not entitled to receive an Honorable Discharge Certificated at that time.

2. The records show the applicant should have discovered the perceived error pertaining to the issue of a discharge certificate at the completion of his active duty service on the date of his REFRAD, which was 21 July 1986. Therefore, the time for him to file a request for correction of this perceived error expired on 20 July 1989. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and he has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file on this issue.

3. The record does confirm that subsequent to his REFRAD the applicant served in the ARNG and was honorably discharged from that component and as a Reserve of the Army on 28 March 1991. In conjunction with this discharge,
he should have received an Honorable Discharge Certificate. However, the
initial issue or replacement of this certificate is an administrative matter that
does not require action by the Board. Therefore, this administrative correction will be accomplished by Case Management Support Division (CMSD),
St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the Board in paragraph 2 of the
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ _____ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ _____ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__RA__ ___YM_ __RO___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested pertaining to correction of the
21 July DD Form 214 of the individual concerned. Therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law in regard to this issue.

2. The Board did determine that an administrative error in the records of the individual should be corrected. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-
St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by issuing him an Honorable Discharge Certificate based on his 28 March 1991 discharge from the Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army.




                  Raymond V. O’Connor
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003091219
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 2003/12/18
TYPE OF DISCHARGE HD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 1986/07/21
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200
DISCHARGE REASON Hardship
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 1021 100.0000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061440C070421

    Original file (2001061440C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The evidence of record shows that the applicant incurred an 8 year MSO upon his initial enlistment in the active Army on 2 October 1989, which would have established his MSO completion date as 1 October 1997. The separation document shows that the applicant was discharged and not transferred to the IRR upon his early separation from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003711

    Original file (20090003711.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains a DD Form 214 that shows while a member of the USAR, she entered active duty on 22 May 1989. The evidence further confirms that when the applicant was issued her DD Form 214, on 19 April 1993, the she had completed a total of 6 years, 3 months, and 29 days of prior inactive service. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075830C070403

    Original file (2002075830C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The opinion recommended that that the applicant’s request be denied and that he not be given credit for the period 25 January 1986 through 20 May 1986. An advisory opinion to this Board stated that when the applicant enlisted in the United States Army through the DEP his military obligation to the USMC ended and recommended that he not be given credit for the time he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081142C070215

    Original file (2002081142C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board concluded that the applicant's commander recommended that he be placed in the IRR; however, his DD Form 214 and orders confirmed that the applicant's discharge was directed and fail to show transfer. The separation authority directed transfer to the IRR; however, the applicant's orders and DD Form 214 failed to show transfer. The regulation clearly stated that soldiers separated for unsatisfactory performance whose service is characterized as honorable would be transferred to the IRR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011495

    Original file (20100011495.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and the U.S. Army Excellence in Competition Badge, Bronze, Pistol. The applicant provides the following: * Permanent Orders 294-003, dated 21 October 2007, awarding him the CIB * DD Form 214 for the period ending 18 July 2008 * DD Form 215 (Correction to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024898

    Original file (20110024898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequent to this acknowledgement, the applicant’s immediate commander recommended the applicant be discharged with a General Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 140-158 (Enlisted Personnel Classification, Promotion, and Reduction), in effect at the time, provided for promotion of Soldiers in the IRR. There is no evidence of record and he provides none to show he held a higher rank/grade between the date his suspended reduction was vacated and the date of his REFRAD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020059

    Original file (20080020059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's unit commander notified him in the 15 June 1991 letter that he had accumulated 9 unexcused absences within a 1 year period, that he decided not to excuse the absences, and that he was declaring the applicant an unsatisfactory participant and transferring him to the IRR for the balance of the applicant's military service obligation (MSO). The evidence of record confirms the applicant was REFRAD upon completion of his IADT after completing 5 months and 18 days. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006556

    Original file (20080006556.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided the following additional documentary evidence in support of her application: a. DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States), dated 15 May 2007 (DCARNG Enlistment); b. DD Form 3540-R (Certificate of Acknowledgement of U.S. Army Reserve Service Requirements and Method of Fulfillment), dated 20 October 2006; c. Undated Written Agreement - Enlisted Affiliation Bonus; d. DA Form 5691-R (Request for Reserve Component Assignment Orders),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101333C070208

    Original file (2004101333C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 September 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004101333 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Melvin H. Meyer | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. It also shows that upon his discharge from the Iowa ARNG on 20 March 1978, at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006262

    Original file (20120006262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The second is for service members whose eligibility for retirement was suspended by Stop Loss. It states that RSLSP is a special pay for military members (including RC members) and former and retired members under the jurisdiction of the Secretary who, while serving on active duty at any time from 11 September 2001 to 30 September 2008, had their enlistment or period of obligated service involuntarily extended or whose established date of separation, release from active duty, or approved...