| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mr. Jessie B. Strickland | Analyst |
| Mr. Fred N. Eichorn | Chairperson | ||
| Mr. Melvin H. Meyer | Member | ||
| Mr. Patrick H. McGann | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and all unit awards that he is entitled to receive.
2. The applicant states that after serving two tours in Vietnam, he was never awarded the CIB or any unit citations.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on 22 July 1971. The application submitted in this case is dated 9 May 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. The applicant enlisted in Newark, New Jersey, on 31 July 1968, for a period of 3 years. He successfully completed his training at Fort Dix, New Jersey, and was assigned to the Pentagon for duty as a light vehicle driver. He remained at the Pentagon until 12 February 1969, when he was transferred to Vietnam.
4. He arrived in Vietnam on 17 March 1969 and was assigned to the 29th Civil Affairs Company for duty as a light vehicle driver. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 7 March 1970 and departed Vietnam on 10 March 1970, for assignment to Germany.
5. He served in Germany until 8 August 1970, when he was transferred back to Vietnam. He arrived in Vietnam on 14 September 1970 and was assigned to the 670th Transportation Company for duty as a senior heavy vehicle truck driver. He was further attached to the 442nd Transportation Company on 15 May 1971 and remained in Vietnam until 21 July 1971, when he was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington.
6. On 22 July 1971, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an overseas returnee. He had served 2 years, 11 months and 22 days of total active service and was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Army Commendation Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal. He had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his records contain no derogatory information.
7. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, established the criteria for award of the CIB. It states, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for the CIB, an individual must be an infantryman with an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) and must perform duty as an infantryman, as a member of an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size, during any period in which that unit was engaged in ground combat. Battle participation credit alone is not sufficient.
8. That regulation also established the criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). It states, in pertinent part, that the AGCM was established by Executive Order 8809, 28 June 1941 and was amended by Executive Order 9323, 1943 and by Executive Order 10444, 10 April 1953 and is awarded for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity in active Federal military service. The regulation also states, in pertinent part, that for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualifies for award of the AGCM.
9. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s units were subsequently awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/Palm) Unit Citation and the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) during the period he was assigned to the units. It also shows that the applicant participated in five campaigns during his assignments in Vietnam and is authorized one silver service star for wear on his already awarded VSM.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s contentions have been noted by the Board; however, the evidence of record fails to show that during his two assignments in Vietnam he performed the duties of an infantryman in an infantry unit that engaged in ground combat against the enemy. Therefore, in accordance with the applicable regulations governing award of the CIB, he is not entitled to be awarded that badge.
2. However, the applicant was entitled to be awarded the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the MUC and one silver service star for wear on his already awarded VSM. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to do so at this time.
3. After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, the Board has determined that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 31 July 1968 through 22 July 1971. This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information, which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving the award.
4. The Board found that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of the unit commanders for which he served. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time.
BOARD VOTE:
_PM___ __MM__ __FE ___ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003091151 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/12/02 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1971/07/22 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR635-200 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (GRANT) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1.107.0111 | 157/CIB |
| 2.107.0094 | 140/RVNGC |
| 3.107.0056 | 102/AGCM |
| 4.107.0034 | 80/MUC |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003083623C070212
A review of the available records fails to show any indication that the applicant was wounded or that he was recommended for award of the Purple Heart. The applicant participated in six campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. Although the standard evidentiary documentation required for awarding the Purple Heart is not present in this case, the Board finds that the statements submitted by three former members of the applicant's unit at the time, of which one was the first sergeant at...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068105C070402
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the MUC, the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation, the RVNGC w/GS Unit Citation, one silver service star for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028538
The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service) he was credited with service in Vietnam from 19 May 1969 through 16 July 1970; b. item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned for duty in Vietnam with: * Company D, 1st Battalion, 7th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), in duty MOS 11B from 23 May to 19 June 1969 and from 9 August 1969 to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021990
The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for his qualifying period of honorable service from 28 May 1965 to 27 May 1968. The evidence of record in this case confirms that although the applicant served in duty MOS 11B during his RVN tour, he never held an infantry MOS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078256C070215
Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register-Vietnam Era) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Table 1 (Army Units in Numerical Order) of the pamphlet indicates that the applicant’s unit was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004157C070208
Linda M. Barker | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019824
There is no evidence in the available records to show that the FSM was ever awarded more than one Purple Heart. A review of the FSM's official records shows that in addition to the awards listed on his DD Form 214 at the time of his retirement, he was also awarded the CIB, the Purple Heart, the Korean Service Medal (KSM), the United Nations Service Medal (UNSM), the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp, and the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) with one oak leaf cluster. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077968C070215
The applicant states that he was wounded in Vietnam on 2 March 1971 and was evacuated to a hospital in Japan. Although the available records do not contain the typical documents required to show that an individual was wounded in combat and that his treatment was made a matter of record, the Board finds the available evidence contained in his records is sufficiently convincing to show that he in fact sustained multiple fragmentation wounds on 2 March 1971 and that he was evacuated to a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000639C070206
He further states that to be eligible for a CIB, one had to be assigned to an infantry command position for a period of 6 months or longer. A review of the available records fails to show that the applicant was ever recommended for award of the CIB or that he ever submitted a request to the appropriate agency for authorization to wear the (un-translated) foreign award he has submitted with his application. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100203C070208
The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 19 February 1971. The evidence of record as well as the evidence submitted by the applicant with his application fails to show that the applicant was wounded in action against the enemy on or about 10 July 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the GCMDL for the period of 20 February 1969 to 19 February 1971, the...