| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Yvonne J. Foskey | Analyst |
| Mr. Robert L. Duecaster | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Joann H. Langston | Member | |
| Ms. Linda D. Simmons | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD).
APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that he was a young and confused seventeen year old boy when he was talked into joining the military by his father. He states that he should never have been in the military and entered against his will. Therefore, he contends that it would be appropriate for him to receive an HD. In support of his application, he submits a copy of his resume and a copy of his separation document (DD Form 214).
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:
On 11 January 1968, he enlisted in the Army at the age of seventeen. His Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows that he successfully completed basic training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina. Upon completion of basic training, the applicant was assigned to Fort Gordon, Georgia to attend advanced individual training (AIT) in military occupational specialty (MOS)
31E (Field Radio Repairman).
On 30 March 1968, while attending AIT, the applicant departed absent without leave (AWOL) from his unit at Fort Gordon. He remained away for 24 days until returning to military control on 22 April 1968. On 27 April 1968, he accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for this offense.
On 7 August 1968, the applicant again departed AWOL from his Fort Gordon AIT unit. He remained away for 98 days until returning to military control at Fort Dix, New Jersey on 12 November 1968. On 22 November 1968, he was found guilty of being AWOL by a SPCM.
On 30 November 1968, the applicant began training in MOS 63B (Wheel Vehicle Mechanic) at Fort Dix. He successfully completed AIT, was awarded MOS 63B, and he was assigned to Fort Stewart, Georgia.
On 2 June 1969, the applicant departed AWOL from his unit at Fort Stewart. He remained away for 91 days until returning to military control on 9 September 1969.
On 2 October 1969, the applicant was found guilty by a special court-martial (SPCM) of being AWOL from on or about 2 June 1969 to on or about
10 September 1969. The resultant sentence included forfeiture of $82.00 per month for four months, confinement at hard labor for four months, and reduction of grade to private/E-1 (PV1).
The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s discharge processing are not in the record. However, there is a separation document (DD Form 214) on file that confirms that on 31 August 1970, he received an UD under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, in lieu of trial by
court-martial. The separation document also verifies that at the time of his discharge, he had completed 1 year and 21 days of creditable active military service, and he had accrued 575 days of time lost. This document also confirms that his last period of documented time lost was from 12 December 1969 through 30 August 1970.
There is no indication that the applicant requested an upgrade of his discharge from the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15 year stature of limitations.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. However at the time of the applicant’s discharge, issuance of an UD was authorized
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and advisory opinion(s), it is concluded:
1. The applicant’s claim that his discharge should be upgraded because he was talked into joining the military at a young age by his father and not of his own free will was carefully considered. However, this factor was not considered to be sufficiently mitigating to warrant the requested relief.
2. The applicant’s record is void of facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to a discharge from the Army. However, the record does include a properly constituted DD Form 214 that was authenticated by the applicant with his signature. This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and government regularity in the discharge process is presumed.
3. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial. In connection with such a discharge, he was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge. Procedurally, he was required to consult with defense counsel, and to voluntarily request separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial. In doing so, he would have admitted guilt to the stipulated offense under the UCMJ.
4. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement
5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__JHL_ _LDS___ __RLD__ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR200309197 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 2003/11 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | HD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 1970/08/31 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200 chapter 10 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | In lieu of court-martial |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9711415
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001530
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence of record indicating the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that boards 15-year statute of limitations. His overall record of service was not sufficiently meritorious to support the issuance of an honorable or a general discharge by the separation authority at the time of his final discharge and absent evidence of an...
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710473C070209
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 12 October 1968 while still in basic training the applicant applied for a hardship discharge based on his parents being in old age and in poor health, his father was suffering from terminal cancer. The applicant further stated that after he had been denied a hardship discharge twice he saw no alternative but to go home and assist his family.
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710473
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 12 October 1968 while still in basic training the applicant applied for a hardship discharge based on his parents being in old age and in poor health, his father was suffering from terminal cancer. On 5 October 1970 the applicant’s unit commander recommended approval of the applicant’s request for discharge for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072744C070403
APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he did not receive his orders for reassignment to his next duty station. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 30 April 1971, the applicant was discharged accordingly.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074844C070403
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 13 May 1974, the applicant was discharged accordingly. In December 1970, long before the applicant was returned to military control after being found by the FBI in 1974, the unit commander from his unit in the RVN sent a letter to his mother informing her of his AWOL status.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004060
His DD Form 214 shows his: * date of discharge as 12 March 1969 * rank and pay grade as private/E-1 * reason for separation as Army Regulation 635-89 (Personnel Separations Homosexuality) * characterization of service as under conditions other than honorable * service in the MOS 57A (Duty Soldier) * only award of the National Defense Service Medal * period of creditable service as 3 months and 29 days * no foreign service * three periods of lost time; 251 day 44 days in AWOL and 207 due...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069827C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710742
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 27 November 1968 he was convicted by a special court-martial at Fort Dix of being AWOL from 5 June to 30 October 1968. However, the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record fail to support his contentions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016211
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. However, at the time of the applicants separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge. XXX ______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.