Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091019C070212
Original file (2003091019C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:


         BOARD DATE: 22 JANUARY 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003091019


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Gale J. Thomas Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Joann H. Langston Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Mr. Ronald J. Weaver Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests that his records be corrected by upgrading his discharge.

2. The applicant states that he was one of 5 individuals cleaning a 5 ton truck by spraying water down the exhaust while another ran the engine to blow out the grime, however he was the only one charged, and believes his discharge should be upgraded to general.

3. The applicant provides no evidence in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of an injustice which occurred on 24 August 1973. The application submitted in this case is dated 29 April 2003.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 August 1970, for a period of 3 years. He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. He served in Korea from February 1971 until April 1972.

4. Between December 1970 and May 1973, he received 6 nonjudicial punishments under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for being absent without leave (AWOL) , failure to obey a lawful order, failure to repair, the wrongful possession of marihuana, and dereliction in the performance of duty. His punishments included reduction, restriction, forfeiture, and extra duty.

5. On 7 July 1972, he was convicted by a summary court-martial of being AWOL from 24 May 1972 to 23 June 1972. His sentence was a forfeiture of pay, reduction to the pay grade of E-1, and to perform hard labor without confinement for 45 days.

6. On 20 December 1972, he was convicted by a special court-martial of damaging the exhaust pipe of a 5 ton truck cargo engine by squirting water down the exhaust pipe. He was sentenced to a forfeiture and extra duty.
7. On 3 April 1973, the applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, for unfitness.

8. On 23 April 1973, his commander recommended that he appear before a board of officers for the purpose of determining whether he should be discharged before the expiration of his term of service.

9. On 20 July 1973, after consulting with counsel, the applicant acknowledged that he understood the basis for his commander’s action to separate him from the service for unfitness. He waived consideration of his case by a board of officers, personal appearance before a board of officers, declined to submit statements in his own behalf, and waived representation by legal counsel. He further acknowledged that he understood that he could encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life in the event of a less than honorable discharge, and that he may be ineligible for all benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State laws.

10. On 8 August 1973, the appropriate separation authority approved the applicant’s separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 for unfitness, and directed his reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, and the issuance of an undesirable discharge.

11. On 24 August 1973, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, under conditions other than honorable and issued an undesirable discharge certificate. His DD Form 214 indicates he had 2 years,
10 months and 10 days of creditable service, and 47 days of lost time.

12. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the policy and prescribes the procedures for administrative separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 13, in effect at that
time, applied to separation for unfitness and unsuitability. Paragraph 13-5(a)1 provided for the separation for unfitness, which included frequent incidents of a discreditable nature, sexual perversion, drug abuse, shirking, failure to pay just debts, failure to support dependents and homosexual acts. When separation for unfitness was warranted an undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.

2. Evidence shows that the applicant was separated for numerous acts of misconduct, and not the single act as stated in his request.

3. The applicant declined counsel, waived his right to a hearing before a board of officers, and acknowledged that he understood the effects of an undesirable discharge.

4. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 24 August 1973; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 23 August 1976. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__JHL __ __AAO__ __RJW__ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.




                  ____See Attached_______
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003091019
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20040122
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016887

    Original file (20100016887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The board determined the evidence presented showed the applicant had habits or traits of character which served to render his retention in the service undesirable and recommended he be discharged under Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Men – Discharge – Unfitness) for unfitness. His service covered a period of for 2 years, 11 months, and 4 days of which 1 year, 11 months, and 28 days was creditable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005729

    Original file (20080005729.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080005729 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge (UD) be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Contrary to the applicant's contentions, the evidence shows he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, for unfitness and issued an undesirable discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011318

    Original file (20080011318.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 11 November 1974, the discharge authority approved the discharge and directed that the applicant be reduced to the lowest enlisted grade and separated with a UD for unfitness. The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005955

    Original file (20090005955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 September 1973, the convening/separation authority approved the board of officer’s findings and recommendations and directed the applicant be discharged under the provisions of paragraph 13-5a of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of unfitness and that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was 18 years of age at the time of his enlistment and between 19 and 20 years of age at the time of his various offenses. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010930

    Original file (20090010930.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Court found him guilty and sentenced him to a reduction to PV1/E-1 and a forfeiture of $25.00 pay. The applicant's records show he submitted a request to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge on 17 February 1981 and he was accordingly scheduled for a hearing. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time and the character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002210C070205

    Original file (20060002210C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 October 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060002210 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 31 August 1972, the applicant was discharged accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009982

    Original file (20090009982.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24 August 1973, the separation authority approved the applicant’s discharge under the provisions of chapter 13 of Army Regulation 635-200 and directed that he be issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 13 of Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080006854

    Original file (AR20080006854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he was told he was going to be discharged with a medical discharge because of his condition. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army, in pay grade E-1, on 1 November 1968, for 3 years. Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019246

    Original file (20140019246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 December 1973, the separation authority approved the discharge action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, and ordered the applicant discharged with the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The applicant was discharged accordingly on 18 December 1973. The discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with applicable law and regulations at the time and the character of his service is commensurate with his overall record of military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003555

    Original file (20090003555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he was discharged on 16 October 1973 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, for unfitness – frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities – with issuance of an undesirable discharge characterized as under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the...