| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Ms. Deyon D. Battle | Analyst |
| Mr. Samuel A. Crumpler | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member | |
| Mr. Curtis L. Greenway | Member |
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge.
2. The applicant states that he was young at the time that he committed the offenses, which lead to his discharge. He states that he now realizes the error of his ways and his only wish is to have his discharge upgraded.
3. The applicant provides no evidence in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant is requesting correction of an injustice, which occurred on 16 April 1984. The application submitted in this case is dated 28 April 2003.
2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.
3. On 21 January 1981, he enlisted in the Army in Denver, Colorado for 3 years in the pay grade of E-1. He successfully completed his training as a chaparrel/redeye repairer. He was promoted to the pay grade of E-2 on 21 July 1981.
4. On 28 October 1981, he was transferred to Korea and on 21 January 1982, he was promoted to the pay grade of E-3.
5. Nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against the applicant on 7 August 1982, for wrongfully absenting himself from the compound from which he was billeted in an off-duty status and not having in his possession a liberty pass. His punishment consisted of a reduction to the pay grade of E-2.
6. On 20 August 1982, the applicant was convicted pursuant to his pleas, by a special court-martial of violating a regulation, larceny and forgery. He was sentenced to a BCD, confinement at hard labor for 4 months, a forfeiture of pay in the amount of $367.00 per month for 4 months and a reduction to the pay grade of E-1.
7. The convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as provided for a BCD, confinement at hard labor for 3 months, a forfeiture of pay in the amount of $367.00 for 3 months and a reduction to the pay grade of E-1.
8. On 3 November 1982, the applicant was placed in a voluntary leave status. On 20 December 1983, his voluntary leave status was changed to involuntary excess leave.
8. On 16 April1984, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3 as a result of a duly reviewed special court-martial conviction. He had completed 3 years of total active service and he was furnished a BCD.
9. There is no evidence of record that shows that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.
10. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 3, paragraph 3-11 provides that a soldier will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence duly executed.
11. Title 10, United Stated Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, provides, in pertinent part, that the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to modify the severity of the punishment imposed.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. The applicant's contention that he was young and immature at the time is not sufficiently mitigating to warrant relief. The applicant was almost 20 years of age at the time of his first offense.
3. The applicant had NJP imposed against him and he was convicted by a special court-martial as a result of his acts of misconduct. Considering the nature of his offences, it does not appear that his BCD is too harsh. He was furnished a discharge commensurate with his overall record of service.
4. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 16 April 1984; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 15 April 1987. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
rks_____ sac_____ clg_____ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2003090641 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20040203 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | BCD |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | 19840416 |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | AR 635-200, CH 3 |
| DISCHARGE REASON | 546/SPCM |
| BOARD DECISION | DENY |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. 675 | 144.6800.0000/BCD |
| 2. 678 | 144.6803.0000/SERIOUSNESS OF OFFENSE |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007489
When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. The evidence of record failed to establish a basis upon which clemency could be granted and upon which the severity of the punishment imposed could be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006948
On 21 March 1983, the applicant was discharged from the Army pursuant to the sentence of a special court-martial and he was issued a BCD. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. The applicant has not provided evidence to show that his discharge was unjust or evidence sufficient to mitigate the character of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000441
The available records show the applicant was 18 years of age at the time of his enlistment and 20 years and 6 months old at the time of discharge. There is no evidence that indicates he was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009124
The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The applicant states, in effect, that he was in the military for 3 years and that he served well. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013880
The applicant requests, in effect, upgrade of his Bad Conduct Discharge to an honorable discharge. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory, but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. ___Richard R. Dunbar_____ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20060013880 SUFFIX RECON YYYYMMDD DATE BOARDED 2007/05/03 TYPE OF DISCHARGE BCD DATE OF DISCHARGE 19821120 DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200, Chapter 3, Section IV DISCHARGE REASON As a Result...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000349
On 22 June 1983, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review set aside the guilty finding of wrongfully appropriating U.S. currency of a value of $50.00, the property of another Soldier, and affirmed only so much of the sentence as provided for a BCD and confinement at hard labor for 2 months. A review of the available records does not show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014369
This form further shows the applicant's character of service as bad conduct discharge and that he completed 3 years, 6 months, and 21 days of creditable military service. There is no indication in the applicant's records that he petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that Board's 15-year statute of limitations. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulation, and the discharge appropriately characterized...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010184
When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The applicant has not provided evidence to show that his discharge was unjust or evidence sufficient to mitigate the character of his discharge. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016605
The applicant was discharged on 1 December 1982, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 11, as a result of court-martial, with a character of service of bad conduct. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15-year statute of limitations for an upgrade of his discharge. A bad conduct discharge is adjudged by a court-martial when it determines a Soldier should be separated under conditions of dishonor after...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008383
The applicant's record shows that he initially enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 February 1977 and continued to serve until he was honorably discharged in the rank of specialist four (SP4) on 5 November 1979. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The applicant's conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the final discharge...