Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090595C070212
Original file (2003090595C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: JANUARY 13, 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003090595


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Jessie B. Strickland Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Ms. Lana E. McGlynn Chairperson
Mr. Patrick H. McGann Member
Mr. Roger W. Able Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect his award of the Purple Heart.

2. The applicant states that he was wounded/injured on duty in Korea and was awarded the Purple Heart; however, it was never included on his DD Form 214. He also states that he was also awarded service connected disability by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant is requesting correction of an error which occurred on 7 August 1958. The application submitted in this case is dated 21 April 2003.

2. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the ABCMR will conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

4. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 August 1955 for a period of 3 years. He completed his training and was transferred to Korea, where he was assigned to the 74th Transportation Company (light truck). He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 27 October 1957.

5. On 7 August 1958, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an overseas returnee. He had served 2 years, 11 months and 26 days of active service during his enlistment and had 8 days of lost time. His DD Form 214 shows in item 26 that he was awarded the Marksmans Marksmanship Badge with rifle bar. In item 27, the entry "None" is entered under " Wounds received as a result of action with enemy forces." The applicant authenticated this form with his signature.

6. A review of the available records shows that the applicant began applying for service-connected disability from the VA as early as 1986. He sought service connection for residuals of a stab wound of the leg and contended that in May 1958, he was stabbed in the left leg while on duty in Korea. He stated that he was on guard duty in the orderly room when a soldier entered with a knife and stated that he was going to cut everybody. The applicant claims he disarmed the soldier, but in the course of doing so, he was stabbed in the left leg, hands, etc. His medical records at the time showed an entry indicating that the applicant was cut with a knife and the stitches were removed from the right leg on 16 December 1957, after having been placed there 2 weeks earlier and had healed very nicely. His records were negative for comments regarding a wound to the left leg. The VA determined that he had service connection for residuals of a stab wound to the right leg, which was considered noncompensable (0%).

7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action from enemy forces. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was a result of hostile action, that the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record. The period of hostilities in Korea that qualified for award of the Purple Heart was from 27 June 1950 through 27 July 1953.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. While the available evidence does establish that the applicant sustained a knife wound to the right leg, it does not establish an entitlement to award of the Purple Heart.

3. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army after hostilities had ended in Korea and there is no evidence that his wound was the result of actions caused by enemy forces. Accordingly, there is no basis to award him the Purple Heart at this time.

4. Records show the applicant should have discovered the error or injustice now under consideration on 7 August 1958; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 6 August 1961. However, the applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse failure to file in this case.
BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

phm_____ lem_____ rwa_____ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case are insufficient to warrant the relief requested, and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.




                  ___Lana E. McGlynn__
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003090595
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 20040113
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 61 107.0015/PH
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000972C070206

    Original file (20050000972C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show three awards of the Purple Heart for wounds he received in Korea and Vietnam. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not list any wounds in item 40 (Wounds). The applicant was assigned to Korea in April 1969 as a personnel staff NCO.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000972C070206

    Original file (20050000972C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show three awards of the Purple Heart for wounds he received in Korea and Vietnam. The applicant was assigned to Korea in April 1969 as a personnel staff NCO. DISCHARGE REASON BOARD DECISION DENY REVIEW AUTHORITY Mr. Chun ISSUES 1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016007

    Original file (20080016007.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s records show he was issued three awards of the Good Conduct Medal, issued on miscellaneous dates, by various Headquarters, for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity, from 4 February 1967 through 3 February 1960 (1st Award); from 18 December 1961 through 17 December 1964 (2nd Award); and from 20 March 1965 through 19 March 1968 (3rd Award). Item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 23 February 1972, shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003488

    Original file (20090003488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s records show he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 5 December 1967 to on or about 26 November 1968. In the absence of documentation that shows he was wounded as a result of "friendly fire" in the "heat of battle" as long as the "friendly" projectile or agent was released with the full intent of inflicting damage or destroying enemy troops or equipment or that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001028

    Original file (20110001028.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, on behalf of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM)), requests award of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show he was awarded the Purple Heart. The FSM's military record is not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the FSM the Purple Heart for wounds...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015439

    Original file (20090015439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is sufficient evidence on which to grant award of the Purple Heart in this case. The entry on the FSM’s DD Form 214 and the entry on the Korean Casualty Roster are accepted as sufficient evidence as a basis to correct his DD Form 214 to show award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 17 June 1952; and b. adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008116

    Original file (20060008116.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant further states he did not request another Purple Heart when he returned to the United States. This form also shows the applicant was honorably discharged on 9 November 1957 in pay grade E-8. The applicant's verified service in the Oregon Army National Guard falls within the time period indicated on the WD AGO 53-55.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011962

    Original file (20060011962.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant sustained wounds as a result of small arms ammunition; however, medical records show that the wound was accidentally self-sustained. As a result there is not basis to grant award of the Purple Heart in this case. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Korea-Korean War Service Medal and correction of his records to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077309C070215

    Original file (2002077309C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    12) A 15 July 2002 letter from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records denying reconsideration of the applicant's request to correct his records to promote him to the rank of first sergeant, pay grade E-8, or to chief warrant officer four (CW4). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The medical board records on 22 October 1952, show that the applicant was a SGT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018359

    Original file (20120018359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. As a result, he was not authorized award of the Purple Heart. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart because he sustained stab wounds from an enemy POW in post-World War II Germany.