Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090518C070212
Original file (2003090518C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved




RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


         IN THE CASE OF:
        

         BOARD DATE: 2 March 2004
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2003090518


         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mr. Paul Wright Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Fred N. Eichorn Chairperson
Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Member
Mr. Robert L. Duecaster Member

         The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the date of his Federal Recognition be corrected to show he was granted Federal Recognition on 9 November 2001.

2. The applicant states he was appointed as a Warrant Officer One (WO1) in the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) on 9 November 2001, the date that he graduated from Warrant Officer Candidate School and granted temporary Federal Recognition. The applicant further contends that, due to administrative oversight, his permanent Federal Recognition was not granted and that a subsequent Federal Recognition Board (FRB) was convened on 27 March 2003.

3. The applicant provides a cover memorandum from the Director, Military Personnel, NYARNG, dated 1 May 2003; a memorandum from the Command Chief Warrant Officer, NYARNG, dated 10 April 2003; National Guard Bureau Recognition Orders Number 95 AR, dated 11 April 2003; a copy of the Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board, dated 27 March 2003; a copy of Orders 098-1029, NYARNG, appointing the applicant as WO1 effective 27 March 2003; a copy of a diploma, dated 9 November 2001, showing the applicant's graduation from Warrant Officer Candidate School; a copy of the applicant's original Oath of Office, dated 9 November 2001; a copy of the Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board, dated 6 July 2000; a copy of Orders 302-002, NYARNG, appointing the applicant as WO1 effective
9 November 2001; a copy of the applicant's request for Federal Recognition dated 23 February 2000; and a copy of a Security Verification Statement, dated 13 February 2003.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1. The applicant completed a period of enlisted service in the NYARNG. He served in an enlisted status until he was appointed as a WO1 on 9 November 2001.

2. The applicant's records contain a course completion certificate from the Warrant Officer Candidate School, dated 9 November 2001, which shows that he successfully completed the requirements of the Warrant Officer Candidate School.

3. NYARNG Orders 302-002, dated 29 October 2001, appointed the applicant in the NYARNG as a WO1, effective 9 November 2001.

4. On 9 November 2001, the applicant executed an Oath of Office as a WO1 in the NYARNG and was granted temporary Federal Recognition.

5. There is no evidence that the National Guard Bureau (NGB) awarded the applicant permanent Federal Recognition, effective 9 November 2001 based on the results of a NYARNG Federal Recognition Board.

6. The applicant's records show that the applicant completed the Aviation Warrant Officer Basic Course on 9 November 2001.

7. NYARNG Orders 098-1029, dated 8 April 2003, appointed the applicant in the NYARNG as a WO1 effective 27 March 2003.

8. On 27 March 2003, a Federal Recognition Board was held by the NYARNG to determine if the applicant was qualified to be awarded Federal Recognition. The proceeding indicated that the applicant met all physical, moral character and general qualifications required for Federal Recognition.

9. National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 95 AR, dated
11 April 2003, awarded the applicant permanent Federal Recognition for initial appointment to the grade of WO1 effective 27 March 2003.

10. National Guard Regulation 600-101 (Warrant Officers-Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing all applications for Federal Recognition. Paragraph 2-2 states that the appointment of warrant officers is a function of the state concerned. These appointments may be federally recognized by the Chief, NGB under such regulations as the Secretary of the Army may prescribe and under the provisions of this regulation. Officers who are federally recognized in a particular grade and branch shall be tendered an appointment in the same grade as Reserve warrant officers of the Army with assignment to the Army National Guard of the United States if they have not already accepted such appointment.

11. NGR 600-101, paragraph 2-4b states that the effective date of Federal Recognition for original appointment is that date on which the warrant officer executes the oath of office in the State. Paragraph 2-3 states that temporary Federal Recognition upon initial appointment establishes the authorized grade to be used by all officers in their federally recognized status.

12. NGR 600-101 paragraph 2-3 states that temporary Federal Recognition may be extended to a warrant officer who has been appointed in the ARNG of a State and found to be qualified by an FRB pending final determination of eligibility and
appointment as a warrant officer of the Army. If not sooner withdrawn or replaced by the granting of permanent Federal Recognition, temporary Federal Recognition will automatically terminate six months after the effective date of State appointment. However, should the initial period of temporary Federal Recognition expire due to administrative processing delays, through no fault of the member, a subsequent FRB should be convened to consider the request again and grant another new period of temporary Federal Recognition if warranted.

13. NGR 600-101, paragraph 2-3a states that temporary Federal Recognition may be granted by an FRB to those eligible when the board finds that the member has successfully passed the examination prescribed herein, has subscribed to the oath of office, and has been appointed by a State order for assignment to a position vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the ARNG. The FRB will forward the NGB Form 89 and allied documents to The Adjutant General. When the member is favorably recommended, The Adjutant General will endorse the packet to the NGB. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1. Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal Recognition effective 9 November 2001 upon his initial appointment in the NYARNG as a WO1. At that time, his Federal Recognition packet and allied documents should have been forwarded to the Adjutant General of the State of New York for endorsement to the National Guard Bureau for extension of permanent Federal Recognition. Through no fault of the applicant, this action was not taken.

2. Subsequently, the applicant's Federal Recognition packet was considered by another NYARNG Federal Recognition Board. Based on the recommendations of that NYARNG Federal Recognition Board, the National Guard Bureau issued orders awarding the applicant permanent Federal Recognition effective 27 March 2003.

3. From the foregoing, it is clear that an administrative error denied the applicant Federal Recognition effective 9 November 2001. Based on applicable law and regulation, the applicant is entitled to have Federal Recognition Order Number
95 AR amended to show the effective date of permanent Federal Recognition in the grade of WO1 is 9 November 2001.

BOARD VOTE:

__fne___ __aao___ __rld___ GRANT RELIEF

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:


The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Federal Recognition Order Number 95 AR to show that he was extended Federal Recognition effective 9 November 2001.




                           Fred N. Eichorn
                  ______________________
                  CHAIRPERSON





INDEX

CASE ID AR2003090518
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20040302
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (GRANT)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 125.0200
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090522C070212

    Original file (2003090522C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the date of his Federal Recognition be corrected to show he was granted Federal Recognition on 31 January 2002. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090519C070212

    Original file (2003090519C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence that the National Guard Bureau (NGB) awarded the applicant permanent Federal Recognition effective 3 August 2001 based on the results of a NYARNG Federal Recognition Board. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090523C070212

    Original file (2003090523C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the date of her Federal Recognition be corrected to show she was granted Federal Recognition on 29 March 2002. On 29 March 2002, the applicant executed an Oath of Office as a WO1 in the NYARNG and was granted temporary Federal Recognition. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090520C070212

    Original file (2003090520C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified. Records show that the applicant was granted temporary Federal Recognition effective 15 November 2002 upon his initial appointment in the NYARNG as a WO1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090524C070212

    Original file (2003090524C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal Recognition effective 9 August 2001 by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the NYARNG Federal Recognition Board. BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Federal Recognition Order Number 95 AR to show that he was extended Federal Recognition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000725C070208

    Original file (20040000725C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal Recognition by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the 30 October 2001 MAARNG Federal Recognition Board. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090525C070212

    Original file (2003090525C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal Recognition effective 26 April 2002, by the National Guard Bureau based on the results of the NYARNG Federal Recognition Board. National Guard Regulation 600-101 paragraph 2-3 states that temporary Federal Recognition may be extended to a warrant officer who has been appointed in the ARNG of a State and found to be qualified by an Federal Recognition Board pending final determination of eligibility and appointment as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003766

    Original file (20150003766.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * his record should be back dated because it was not his fault his Federal recognition orders were not completed in a timely manner * he completed the Warrant Officer Career Course on 31 January 2013, and the Aviation Initial Entry Rotary Wing (IERW) Course and Basic Officer Leader Course - B (BOLC-B) on 11 September 2014 * he should be eligible for promotion in January 2015; however, because his Federal recognition orders were not completed until January 2015, his new...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019347

    Original file (20130019347.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer two (CW2) in the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) from 29 January 2013 to 20 August 2012. He further contends his DOR should be adjusted in accordance with (lAW) the NGB PPOM Number 13-006, dated 6 February 2013, which states in part, "Implement the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for WO promotions to CW2 which removed the requirement for a Federal Recognition Board (FRB) for promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065886C070421

    Original file (2001065886C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's service personnel records show he was appointed in the ORARNG and was granted temporary Federal Recognition on 29 June 1992. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which shows the June 1992 request for Federal Recognition was denied by the Chief, NGB. c. Correct all personnel and pay records to show that the individual concerned was appointed in the ORARNG, in the grade of CW2, with the MOS 550A, effective 29 June 1992 and has served in that grade...